Color Identity Spread
All commanders (30)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 2.39 · 77.2% (574 of 744 decks)
- Animar, Soul of Elements relevance 2.33 · 40.1% (4,934 of 12,313 decks)
- Eshki, Temur's Roar relevance 2.02 · 34.4% (2,958 of 8,592 decks)
- Bruce Banner // The Incredible Hulk relevance 1.64 · 26.2% (1,949 of 7,443 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 1.40 · 42.4% (140 of 330 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh relevance 1.38 · 21.3% (1,370 of 6,418 decks)
- Pako, Arcane Retriever // Haldan, Avid Arcanist relevance 1.26 · 20.8% (822 of 3,950 decks)
- Surrak Dragonclaw relevance 1.26 · 27.3% (290 of 1,063 decks)
- Loot, the Pathfinder relevance 1.22 · 22.0% (539 of 2,451 decks)
- Eshki Dragonclaw relevance 1.21 · 20.2% (699 of 3,467 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 1.17 · 47.5% (48 of 101 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 1.03 · 15.9% (670 of 4,208 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.95 · 28.3% (66 of 233 decks)
- Xyris, the Writhing Storm relevance 0.95 · 12.4% (1,295 of 10,444 decks)
- Yasova Dragonclaw relevance 0.88 · 18.8% (144 of 764 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.84 · 27.7% (41 of 148 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.74 · 44.4% (12 of 27 decks)
- Loot, the Key to Everything relevance 0.70 · 12.1% (221 of 1,829 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.69 · 23.0% (31 of 135 decks)
- Riku of Two Reflections relevance 0.64 · 10.0% (286 of 2,861 decks)
- Magus Lucea Kane relevance 0.63 · 8.0% (704 of 8,755 decks)
- Yasmin Khan // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.62 · 42.1% (8 of 19 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.53 · 57.1% (4 of 7 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.49 · 23.8% (10 of 42 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.47 · 31.6% (6 of 19 decks)
- Sakashima of a Thousand Faces // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.46 · 14.5% (22 of 152 decks)
- Miirym, Sentinel Wyrm relevance 0.44 · 5.1% (783 of 15,221 decks)
- Averna, the Chaos Bloom relevance 0.43 · 6.6% (201 of 3,060 decks)
- Flubs, the Fool relevance 0.42 · 5.1% (613 of 11,971 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.42 · 80.9% (17,839 of 22,064 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.19 · 44.3% (9,764 of 22,064 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.77 · 43.5% (9,598 of 22,064 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.76 · 38.0% (8,382 of 22,064 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.65 · 25.1% (5,535 of 22,064 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.62 · 31.8% (7,027 of 22,064 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.59 · 26.1% (5,757 of 22,064 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.58 · 22.8% (5,025 of 22,064 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.57 · 26.1% (5,753 of 22,064 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.57 · 18.7% (4,121 of 22,064 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.56 · 30.0% (6,613 of 22,064 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (5,201 of 22,064 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.54 · 33.6% (7,405 of 22,064 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.54 · 21.7% (4,778 of 22,064 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.54 · 27.4% (6,036 of 22,064 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (5,104 of 22,064 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.53 · 32.7% (7,207 of 22,064 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.52 · 30.3% (6,681 of 22,064 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.50 · 23.6% (5,216 of 22,064 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (3,579 of 22,064 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (3,274 of 22,064 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (2,864 of 22,064 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.49 · 22.1% (4,880 of 22,064 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.49 · 27.2% (6,004 of 22,064 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.48 · 36.9% (8,145 of 22,064 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (3,120 of 22,064 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (6,559 of 22,064 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (3,616 of 22,064 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (3,163 of 22,064 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.47 · 17.1% (3,781 of 22,064 decks)
All creatures (22)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 1.42 · 80.9% (17,839 of 22,064 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.19 · 44.3% (9,764 of 22,064 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.77 · 43.5% (9,598 of 22,064 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.76 · 38.0% (8,382 of 22,064 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.65 · 25.1% (5,535 of 22,064 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 0.62 · 31.8% (7,027 of 22,064 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.58 · 22.8% (5,025 of 22,064 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.57 · 26.1% (5,753 of 22,064 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 0.57 · 18.7% (4,121 of 22,064 decks)
- Maelstrom Wanderer relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (5,201 of 22,064 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.54 · 21.7% (4,778 of 22,064 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.53 · 23.1% (5,104 of 22,064 decks)
- Ancestral Statue relevance 0.49 · 14.8% (3,274 of 22,064 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 0.49 · 13.0% (2,864 of 22,064 decks)
- Imperial Recruiter relevance 0.48 · 14.1% (3,120 of 22,064 decks)
- Rattleclaw Mystic relevance 0.47 · 16.4% (3,616 of 22,064 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.47 · 14.3% (3,163 of 22,064 decks)
- Elvish Spirit Guide relevance 0.47 · 17.1% (3,781 of 22,064 decks)
- Gwenna, Eyes of Gaea relevance 0.46 · 15.2% (3,350 of 22,064 decks)
- Cloud of Faeries relevance 0.46 · 16.7% (3,693 of 22,064 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.46 · 16.5% (3,648 of 22,064 decks)
- Sakura-Tribe Elder relevance 0.45 · 20.0% (4,422 of 22,064 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.59 · 26.1% (5,757 of 22,064 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.50 · 23.6% (5,216 of 22,064 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.49 · 22.1% (4,880 of 22,064 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.49 · 27.2% (6,004 of 22,064 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.47 · 29.7% (6,559 of 22,064 decks)
All instants (6)
- Swan Song relevance 0.56 · 30.0% (6,613 of 22,064 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.54 · 33.6% (7,405 of 22,064 decks)
- Worldly Tutor relevance 0.54 · 27.4% (6,036 of 22,064 decks)
- Deflecting Swat relevance 0.53 · 32.7% (7,207 of 22,064 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.52 · 30.3% (6,681 of 22,064 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.48 · 36.9% (8,145 of 22,064 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.49 · 16.2% (3,579 of 22,064 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.52 · 32.5% (7,172 of 22,064 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.49 · 26.6% (5,870 of 22,064 decks)
All lands (14)
- City of Brass relevance 0.56 · 25.7% (5,665 of 22,064 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.54 · 23.7% (5,228 of 22,064 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.54 · 44.4% (9,789 of 22,064 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.51 · 42.4% (9,362 of 22,064 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.51 · 23.2% (5,127 of 22,064 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.49 · 21.3% (4,699 of 22,064 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.48 · 36.9% (8,141 of 22,064 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.48 · 21.4% (4,728 of 22,064 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.48 · 24.9% (5,503 of 22,064 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.47 · 20.3% (4,490 of 22,064 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.47 · 24.0% (5,288 of 22,064 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.46 · 32.6% (7,200 of 22,064 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.46 · 23.2% (5,114 of 22,064 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.45 · 37.3% (8,235 of 22,064 decks)
EDH data for Elvish Mystic: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 22,064 real decks.