Primal Visitation
Played in 128 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
60.1% Gruul
430+19+3+6+9+9+1+3+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Borborygmos relevance 0.92 · 2.1% (3 of 143 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.59 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.54 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Skanos Dragonheart // Dragon Cultist relevance 0.38 · 1.1% (1 of 89 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Zhur-Taa Swine relevance 1.09 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Ground Assault relevance 1.00 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Charm relevance 0.94 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Keyrune relevance 0.92 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Savage Smash relevance 0.92 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Tilling relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Rampager relevance 0.83 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.82 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Pit Fight relevance 0.78 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Burning-Tree Emissary relevance 0.78 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.77 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Skarrg Guildmage relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Locket relevance 0.72 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.71 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Feral Animist relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Arynx relevance 0.62 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Snarling Wolf relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Phytoburst relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Fanatic of Xenagos relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.52 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Colossal Might relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.51 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Zhur-Taa Swine relevance 1.09 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Ghor-Clan Rampager relevance 0.83 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Burning-Tree Emissary relevance 0.78 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Skarrg Guildmage relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Druid relevance 0.71 · 22.7% (29 of 128 decks)
- Rubblebelt Raiders relevance 0.70 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Feral Animist relevance 0.65 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Arynx relevance 0.62 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Snarling Wolf relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Fanatic of Xenagos relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Rubblehulk relevance 0.51 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Pestilent Wolf relevance 0.47 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.47 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Bird Admirer // Wing Shredder relevance 0.47 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Child of the Pack // Savage Packmate relevance 0.47 · 11.7% (15 of 128 decks)
- Bounding Wolf relevance 0.45 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Tireless Hauler // Dire-Strain Brawler relevance 0.44 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Savageborn Hydra relevance 0.44 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Reckless Waif // Merciless Predator relevance 0.43 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Gruul Keyrune relevance 0.92 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Cluestone relevance 0.82 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Gruul Locket relevance 0.72 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Runes of the Deus relevance 0.77 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
- Gruul War Chant relevance 0.69 · 23.4% (30 of 128 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.60 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Invigorating Hot Spring relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Blanchwood Armor relevance 0.47 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Cindervines relevance 0.47 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
All instants (9)
- Gruul Charm relevance 0.94 · 21.9% (28 of 128 decks)
- Pit Fight relevance 0.78 · 16.4% (21 of 128 decks)
- Plummet relevance 0.74 · 12.5% (16 of 128 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.52 · 10.2% (13 of 128 decks)
- Colossal Might relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 0.51 · 8.6% (11 of 128 decks)
- Signal the Clans relevance 0.47 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.44 · 10.9% (14 of 128 decks)
- Predator's Rapport relevance 0.42 · 6.3% (8 of 128 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Ground Assault relevance 1.00 · 20.3% (26 of 128 decks)
- Savage Smash relevance 0.92 · 17.2% (22 of 128 decks)
- Frenzied Tilling relevance 0.91 · 14.1% (18 of 128 decks)
- Savage Twister relevance 0.66 · 13.3% (17 of 128 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 0.63 · 15.6% (20 of 128 decks)
- Phytoburst relevance 0.53 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Demolish relevance 0.50 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
- Armed // Dangerous relevance 0.48 · 9.4% (12 of 128 decks)
- Act of Treason relevance 0.46 · 7.8% (10 of 128 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.51 · 14.8% (19 of 128 decks)
All lands (3)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 1.33 · 42.2% (54 of 128 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.91 · 39.8% (51 of 128 decks)
- Unknown Shores relevance 0.46 · 7.0% (9 of 128 decks)
EDH data for Primal Visitation: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 128 real decks.

























































