Deceiver Exarch
Played in 492 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Prime Speaker Vannifar relevance 5.69 · 35.3% (366 of 1,036 decks)
- Alaundo the Seer relevance 0.95 · 1.1% (16 of 1,496 decks)
- Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Shameless Charlatan relevance 0.92 · 18.2% (2 of 11 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.73 · 1.0% (8 of 779 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.48 · 8.3% (1 of 12 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.40 · 4.5% (1 of 22 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 0.36 · 1.0% (2 of 194 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Sword Coast Sailor relevance 0.26 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.24 · 1.1% (1 of 88 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 4.07 · 69.7% (343 of 492 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 3.97 · 70.7% (348 of 492 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 3.84 · 63.2% (311 of 492 decks)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 3.52 · 64.0% (315 of 492 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 2.53 · 39.6% (195 of 492 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 2.49 · 46.7% (230 of 492 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 2.48 · 51.8% (255 of 492 decks)
- Body Double relevance 2.34 · 43.9% (216 of 492 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 2.21 · 39.8% (196 of 492 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 2.12 · 38.6% (190 of 492 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.01 · 46.7% (230 of 492 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 1.85 · 39.0% (192 of 492 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.77 · 53.5% (263 of 492 decks)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 1.63 · 39.6% (195 of 492 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 1.61 · 27.4% (135 of 492 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 1.55 · 22.6% (111 of 492 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.41 · 26.8% (132 of 492 decks)
- Neoform relevance 1.36 · 38.2% (188 of 492 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 1.33 · 26.6% (131 of 492 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.31 · 61.6% (303 of 492 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.30 · 28.7% (141 of 492 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 1.28 · 31.9% (157 of 492 decks)
- Teardrop Kami relevance 1.25 · 18.5% (91 of 492 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 1.21 · 18.7% (92 of 492 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 1.21 · 30.9% (152 of 492 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (103 of 492 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.13 · 39.0% (192 of 492 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (108 of 492 decks)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.12 · 34.3% (169 of 492 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (101 of 492 decks)
All creatures (38)
- Breaching Hippocamp relevance 4.07 · 69.7% (343 of 492 decks)
- Corridor Monitor relevance 3.97 · 70.7% (348 of 492 decks)
- Pestermite relevance 3.84 · 63.2% (311 of 492 decks)
- Bounding Krasis relevance 3.52 · 64.0% (315 of 492 decks)
- Hyrax Tower Scout relevance 2.53 · 39.6% (195 of 492 decks)
- Protean Hulk relevance 2.49 · 46.7% (230 of 492 decks)
- Great Oak Guardian relevance 2.48 · 51.8% (255 of 492 decks)
- Body Double relevance 2.34 · 43.9% (216 of 492 decks)
- Scryb Ranger relevance 2.21 · 39.8% (196 of 492 decks)
- Fatestitcher relevance 2.12 · 38.6% (190 of 492 decks)
- Quirion Ranger relevance 2.01 · 46.7% (230 of 492 decks)
- Woodland Bellower relevance 1.85 · 39.0% (192 of 492 decks)
- Peregrine Drake relevance 1.77 · 53.5% (263 of 492 decks)
- Loaming Shaman relevance 1.61 · 27.4% (135 of 492 decks)
- Disciple of the Ring relevance 1.55 · 22.6% (111 of 492 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 1.41 · 26.8% (132 of 492 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 1.31 · 61.6% (303 of 492 decks)
- Vizier of Tumbling Sands relevance 1.30 · 28.7% (141 of 492 decks)
- Teardrop Kami relevance 1.25 · 18.5% (91 of 492 decks)
- Glamermite relevance 1.21 · 18.7% (92 of 492 decks)
- Timeless Witness relevance 1.21 · 30.9% (152 of 492 decks)
- Fblthp, the Lost relevance 1.17 · 20.9% (103 of 492 decks)
- Arbor Elf relevance 1.13 · 39.0% (192 of 492 decks)
- Wirewood Symbiote relevance 1.13 · 22.0% (108 of 492 decks)
- Deadeye Navigator relevance 1.08 · 31.1% (153 of 492 decks)
- Elvish Mystic relevance 1.05 · 70.3% (346 of 492 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 1.04 · 51.6% (254 of 492 decks)
- Eternal Witness relevance 1.02 · 54.7% (269 of 492 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.99 · 23.8% (117 of 492 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.98 · 77.4% (381 of 492 decks)
- Acidic Slime relevance 0.97 · 30.1% (148 of 492 decks)
- Seeker of Skybreak relevance 0.88 · 17.9% (88 of 492 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.86 · 36.6% (180 of 492 decks)
- Formidable Speaker relevance 0.80 · 24.8% (122 of 492 decks)
- Mulldrifter relevance 0.78 · 24.6% (121 of 492 decks)
- Greenwarden of Murasa relevance 0.77 · 13.4% (66 of 492 decks)
- Giant-Sized Flying Ant relevance 0.77 · 12.2% (60 of 492 decks)
- Ioreth of the Healing House relevance 0.77 · 18.1% (89 of 492 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Thousand-Year Elixir relevance 1.63 · 39.6% (195 of 492 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 1.33 · 26.6% (131 of 492 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Intruder Alarm relevance 1.12 · 34.3% (169 of 492 decks)
- Instill Energy relevance 1.09 · 20.5% (101 of 492 decks)
- Concordant Crossroads relevance 0.87 · 24.4% (120 of 492 decks)
All instants (3)
- Shore Up relevance 1.28 · 31.9% (157 of 492 decks)
- Vitalize relevance 1.09 · 22.8% (112 of 492 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.94 · 20.3% (100 of 492 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Neoform relevance 1.36 · 38.2% (188 of 492 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.99 · 27.2% (134 of 492 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 1.28 · 26.8% (132 of 492 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.83 · 27.4% (135 of 492 decks)
EDH data for Deceiver Exarch: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 492 real decks.