Crescendo of War
Played in 165 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (6)
- Radiant, Serra Archangel // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 1.51 · 13.3% (4 of 30 decks)
- Rasputin, the Oneiromancer relevance 0.79 · 1.2% (4 of 341 decks)
- Faramir, Steward of Gondor relevance 0.75 · 1.0% (4 of 398 decks)
- K-9, Mark I // The Eleventh Doctor relevance 0.66 · 14.3% (1 of 7 decks)
- Ith, High Arcanist relevance 0.45 · 2.8% (1 of 36 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.42 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Commander's Insignia relevance 1.31 · 21.8% (36 of 165 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 1.30 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Consulate Crackdown relevance 1.27 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 1.25 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Aurification relevance 1.24 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Conclave Tribunal relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Crackdown relevance 1.23 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Cradle of Vitality relevance 1.23 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Cowed by Wisdom relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 1.20 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.19 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Call for Unity relevance 1.19 · 20.6% (34 of 165 decks)
- Aegis of Honor relevance 1.18 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Consulate Surveillance relevance 1.17 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.17 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Coercive Portal relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Divine Intervention relevance 1.15 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 1.15 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Celestial Convergence relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Cooped Up relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Contractual Safeguard relevance 1.14 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 1.14 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Commanding Presence relevance 1.14 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Unbinding relevance 1.13 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Court of Ardenvale relevance 1.12 · 23.0% (38 of 165 decks)
- Angelic Exaltation relevance 1.12 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 1.12 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Cryptoplasm relevance 1.17 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Court Homunculus relevance 1.12 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
- Court Hussar relevance 1.12 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Crafty Cutpurse relevance 1.11 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Commander Eesha relevance 1.10 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Constable of the Realm relevance 1.10 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
- Archetype of Courage relevance 1.09 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Combat Calligrapher relevance 1.08 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Coercive Portal relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Conjurer's Mantle relevance 1.08 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
All enchantments (30)
- Commander's Insignia relevance 1.31 · 21.8% (36 of 165 decks)
- Concerted Effort relevance 1.30 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Echoes relevance 1.30 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Consulate Crackdown relevance 1.27 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Cast Through Time relevance 1.25 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Aurification relevance 1.24 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Conclave Tribunal relevance 1.24 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Crackdown relevance 1.23 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Cradle of Vitality relevance 1.23 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Vitality relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Cowed by Wisdom relevance 1.21 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 1.20 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Exhaustion relevance 1.19 · 20.0% (33 of 165 decks)
- Call for Unity relevance 1.19 · 20.6% (34 of 165 decks)
- Aegis of Honor relevance 1.18 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Consulate Surveillance relevance 1.17 · 19.4% (32 of 165 decks)
- Divine Intervention relevance 1.15 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Crab Umbra relevance 1.15 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Celestial Convergence relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Cooped Up relevance 1.15 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Commanding Presence relevance 1.14 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Curse of Unbinding relevance 1.13 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Court of Ardenvale relevance 1.12 · 23.0% (38 of 165 decks)
- Angelic Exaltation relevance 1.12 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Force of Virtue relevance 1.11 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Court of Vantress relevance 1.11 · 24.2% (40 of 165 decks)
- Dictate of Heliod relevance 1.11 · 21.2% (35 of 165 decks)
- Absolute Law relevance 1.09 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Absolute Grace relevance 1.08 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Aven Shrine relevance 1.08 · 15.8% (26 of 165 decks)
All instants (6)
- Contractual Safeguard relevance 1.14 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Counterlash relevance 1.12 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
- Commence the Endgame relevance 1.11 · 17.0% (28 of 165 decks)
- Complete the Circuit relevance 1.10 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Countervailing Winds relevance 1.09 · 18.2% (30 of 165 decks)
- Contradict relevance 1.08 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Crisis of Conscience relevance 1.14 · 17.6% (29 of 165 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.11 · 18.8% (31 of 165 decks)
- Diminishing Returns relevance 1.08 · 16.4% (27 of 165 decks)
EDH data for Crescendo of War: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 165 real decks.