Color Identity Spread
2.2% Jund
530+31+2+14+2+1+
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Gyrus, Waker of Corpses relevance 1.99 · 2.9% (19 of 645 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 1.87 · 22.7% (5 of 22 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 1.01 · 4.1% (3 of 73 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.92 · 7.4% (2 of 27 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.36 · 1.3% (1 of 78 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Feral Hydra relevance 2.49 · 36.7% (61 of 166 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.59 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Apocalypse Hydra relevance 1.59 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Savageborn Hydra relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.16 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.16 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.14 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.11 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.04 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Shivan Devastator relevance 1.04 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.03 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 1.02 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.01 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.01 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Undercity Uprising relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.97 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Incriminating Impetus relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.96 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.95 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Coercive Impetus relevance 0.94 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.93 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Thantis, the Warweaver relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.89 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.88 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Feral Hydra relevance 2.49 · 36.7% (61 of 166 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 1.59 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Apocalypse Hydra relevance 1.59 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Savageborn Hydra relevance 1.37 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 1.26 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 1.16 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Primordial Hydra relevance 1.16 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Mistcutter Hydra relevance 1.14 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.11 · 29.5% (49 of 166 decks)
- Steelbane Hydra relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (27 of 166 decks)
- Gargos, Vicious Watcher relevance 1.04 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Shivan Devastator relevance 1.04 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Hooded Hydra relevance 1.03 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 1.02 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Goldvein Hydra relevance 1.01 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.96 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 0.96 · 25.9% (43 of 166 decks)
- Nyxborn Hydra relevance 0.95 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Voracious Hydra relevance 0.93 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 0.93 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Thantis, the Warweaver relevance 0.92 · 17.5% (29 of 166 decks)
- Benevolent Hydra relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 0.86 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 0.84 · 22.3% (37 of 166 decks)
- Alexios, Deimos of Kosmos relevance 0.83 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Grakmaw, Skyclave Ravager relevance 0.82 · 12.7% (21 of 166 decks)
- Karazikar, the Eye Tyrant relevance 0.82 · 19.9% (33 of 166 decks)
- Bothersome Quasit relevance 0.80 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Barbflare Gremlin relevance 0.80 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.79 · 12.0% (20 of 166 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 0.79 · 19.3% (32 of 166 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Victory Chimes relevance 0.81 · 18.7% (31 of 166 decks)
- Bloodthirsty Blade relevance 0.79 · 16.9% (28 of 166 decks)
All enchantments (14)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 1.02 · 28.3% (47 of 166 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 1.01 · 28.9% (48 of 166 decks)
- Unbound Flourishing relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 0.97 · 25.3% (42 of 166 decks)
- Incriminating Impetus relevance 0.96 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Coercive Impetus relevance 0.94 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Eye of Nidhogg relevance 0.89 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
- Ghoulish Impetus relevance 0.88 · 18.1% (30 of 166 decks)
- Shiny Impetus relevance 0.88 · 20.5% (34 of 166 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 0.88 · 24.1% (40 of 166 decks)
- The Sound of Drums relevance 0.85 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Parasitic Impetus relevance 0.84 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 0.82 · 21.1% (35 of 166 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 0.78 · 21.7% (36 of 166 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Undercity Uprising relevance 0.98 · 14.5% (24 of 166 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 0.84 · 15.7% (26 of 166 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Arcane Lighthouse relevance 0.79 · 15.1% (25 of 166 decks)
EDH data for Capricopian: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 166 real decks.













































