Dazzling Lights
Played in 173 Blue decks
Color Identity Spread
22.2% Blue
All commanders (14)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 2.56 · 4.8% (32 of 665 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 1.61 · 1.4% (23 of 1,655 decks)
- Fblthp, Lost on the Range relevance 1.17 · 1.0% (12 of 1,164 decks)
- Wasp, Shrinking Savior relevance 0.76 · 3.8% (2 of 52 decks)
- Beetle, Legacy Criminal relevance 0.60 · 10.0% (1 of 10 decks)
- Ruric Thar, Biomagus relevance 0.58 · 1.5% (2 of 130 decks)
- Shameless Charlatan // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.57 · 7.7% (1 of 13 decks)
- Proft, Consulting Detective relevance 0.53 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Yuriko, Hope from the Shadows relevance 0.43 · 2.6% (1 of 39 decks)
- Jason Bright, Glowing Prophet relevance 0.36 · 1.5% (1 of 67 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Orysa, Tide Choreographer relevance 0.34 · 1.3% (1 of 76 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy // Candlekeep Sage relevance 0.33 · 1.2% (1 of 86 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.32 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.70 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Unexplained Disappearance relevance 1.65 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.50 · 40.5% (70 of 173 decks)
- Curate relevance 1.36 · 34.1% (59 of 173 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 1.23 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.15 · 59.5% (103 of 173 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.98 · 22.5% (39 of 173 decks)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.95 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.92 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Befuddle relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.83 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 0.81 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.80 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.80 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.77 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Ephara's Dispersal relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Swallowed by Leviathan relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Diminish relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.70 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 46.2% (80 of 173 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.69 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Mindwhisker relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Select for Inspection relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.80 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Nightveil Sprite relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Mindwhisker relevance 0.68 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 0.56 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Cruel Witness relevance 0.54 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
- Cryptic Annelid relevance 0.54 · 9.8% (17 of 173 decks)
- Il Mheg Pixie relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Rune-Sealed Wall relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Enhanced Surveillance relevance 0.92 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
All instants (31)
- Chain to Memory relevance 1.70 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Unexplained Disappearance relevance 1.65 · 27.2% (47 of 173 decks)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 1.50 · 40.5% (70 of 173 decks)
- Curate relevance 1.36 · 34.1% (59 of 173 decks)
- Unauthorized Exit relevance 1.23 · 24.9% (43 of 173 decks)
- Consider relevance 1.15 · 59.5% (103 of 173 decks)
- Dreams of Laguna relevance 0.98 · 22.5% (39 of 173 decks)
- Befuddle relevance 0.85 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.83 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Chilling Trap relevance 0.81 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Sinister Sabotage relevance 0.80 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Mission Briefing relevance 0.77 · 20.8% (36 of 173 decks)
- Ephara's Dispersal relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Swallowed by Leviathan relevance 0.71 · 13.9% (24 of 173 decks)
- Diminish relevance 0.71 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Don't Make a Sound relevance 0.71 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.71 · 16.8% (29 of 173 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.70 · 17.3% (30 of 173 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.69 · 46.2% (80 of 173 decks)
- Select for Inspection relevance 0.62 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Anticipate relevance 0.62 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.58 · 15.6% (27 of 173 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.56 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Banishing Betrayal relevance 0.55 · 11.0% (19 of 173 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.54 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Defy Gravity relevance 0.54 · 12.1% (21 of 173 decks)
- Annul relevance 0.53 · 14.5% (25 of 173 decks)
- Unsummon relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (28 of 173 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 0.51 · 9.2% (16 of 173 decks)
- Downsize relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (13 of 173 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Contingency Plan relevance 0.95 · 17.9% (31 of 173 decks)
- Taigam's Scheming relevance 0.77 · 12.7% (22 of 173 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.69 · 26.6% (46 of 173 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.55 · 15.0% (26 of 173 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.54 · 18.5% (32 of 173 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.51 · 33.5% (58 of 173 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.51 · 10.4% (18 of 173 decks)
- Start the TARDIS relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (15 of 173 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Hidden Grotto relevance 0.65 · 13.3% (23 of 173 decks)
- Conduit Pylons relevance 0.57 · 11.6% (20 of 173 decks)
EDH data for Dazzling Lights: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 173 real decks.