Soul Exchange
Played in 362 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
11.5% Dimir
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (11)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 3.40 · 9.2% (83 of 898 decks)
- Rona, Herald of Invasion // Rona, Tolarian Obliterator relevance 1.76 · 2.1% (33 of 1,576 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 1.05 · 2.6% (6 of 227 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Siani, Eye of the Storm relevance 1.05 · 25.0% (2 of 8 decks)
- Skeleton Ship relevance 0.89 · 1.4% (7 of 502 decks)
- Feywild Visitor // Sivriss, Nightmare Speaker relevance 0.69 · 4.3% (2 of 46 decks)
- Ludevic, Necrogenius // Olag, Ludevic's Hubris relevance 0.67 · 1.9% (3 of 154 decks)
- Uchbenbak, the Great Mistake relevance 0.53 · 1.9% (2 of 103 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.32 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
- Locke Cole relevance 0.27 · 1.1% (1 of 93 decks)
- Alpharael, Dreaming Acolyte relevance 0.26 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Persist relevance 1.63 · 48.9% (177 of 362 decks)
- Exhume relevance 1.41 · 32.3% (117 of 362 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.33 · 46.7% (169 of 362 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 1.25 · 57.5% (208 of 362 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 1.24 · 37.0% (134 of 362 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 1.22 · 38.4% (139 of 362 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 1.21 · 28.2% (102 of 362 decks)
- Victimize relevance 1.03 · 53.9% (195 of 362 decks)
- Diabolic Servitude relevance 0.98 · 15.7% (57 of 362 decks)
- Will of the Abzan relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (80 of 362 decks)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (76 of 362 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (106 of 362 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.86 · 21.3% (77 of 362 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 0.81 · 14.9% (54 of 362 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.81 · 59.4% (215 of 362 decks)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.79 · 17.4% (63 of 362 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (100 of 362 decks)
- Incarnation Technique relevance 0.78 · 18.0% (65 of 362 decks)
- Makeshift Mannequin relevance 0.74 · 11.3% (41 of 362 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (47 of 362 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.69 · 20.4% (74 of 362 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.68 · 21.8% (79 of 362 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.68 · 28.5% (103 of 362 decks)
- Demon of Dark Schemes relevance 0.67 · 11.0% (40 of 362 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (48 of 362 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (62 of 362 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (99 of 362 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (61 of 362 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.63 · 18.0% (65 of 362 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (56 of 362 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Vilis, Broker of Blood relevance 0.90 · 21.0% (76 of 362 decks)
- Vile Mutilator relevance 0.81 · 14.9% (54 of 362 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.79 · 27.6% (100 of 362 decks)
- Scholar of the Lost Trove relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (47 of 362 decks)
- Nezahal, Primal Tide relevance 0.69 · 20.4% (74 of 362 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.68 · 21.8% (79 of 362 decks)
- Demon of Dark Schemes relevance 0.67 · 11.0% (40 of 362 decks)
- Lord of Change relevance 0.67 · 13.3% (48 of 362 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (62 of 362 decks)
- Valgavoth, Terror Eater relevance 0.63 · 16.9% (61 of 362 decks)
- Jin-Gitaxias, Core Augur relevance 0.63 · 18.0% (65 of 362 decks)
- Astral Dragon relevance 0.61 · 14.4% (52 of 362 decks)
- Sphinx of the Second Sun relevance 0.60 · 16.6% (60 of 362 decks)
- Hoarding Broodlord relevance 0.59 · 14.4% (52 of 362 decks)
- Ardyn, the Usurper relevance 0.57 · 14.6% (53 of 362 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 0.57 · 8.3% (30 of 362 decks)
- Consecrated Sphinx relevance 0.57 · 16.6% (60 of 362 decks)
- Body Double relevance 0.55 · 13.8% (50 of 362 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Animate Dead relevance 1.25 · 57.5% (208 of 362 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 1.22 · 38.4% (139 of 362 decks)
- Dance of the Dead relevance 1.21 · 28.2% (102 of 362 decks)
- Diabolic Servitude relevance 0.98 · 15.7% (57 of 362 decks)
All instants (8)
- Makeshift Mannequin relevance 0.74 · 11.3% (41 of 362 decks)
- Entomb relevance 0.68 · 28.5% (103 of 362 decks)
- Tainted Indulgence relevance 0.63 · 15.5% (56 of 362 decks)
- Thirst for Meaning relevance 0.62 · 10.2% (37 of 362 decks)
- Thirst for Discovery relevance 0.62 · 14.1% (51 of 362 decks)
- Bitter Triumph relevance 0.62 · 20.7% (75 of 362 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.59 · 35.9% (130 of 362 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (49 of 362 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Persist relevance 1.63 · 48.9% (177 of 362 decks)
- Exhume relevance 1.41 · 32.3% (117 of 362 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.33 · 46.7% (169 of 362 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 1.24 · 37.0% (134 of 362 decks)
- Victimize relevance 1.03 · 53.9% (195 of 362 decks)
- Will of the Abzan relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (80 of 362 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.86 · 29.3% (106 of 362 decks)
- Zombify relevance 0.86 · 21.3% (77 of 362 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.81 · 59.4% (215 of 362 decks)
- Coiling Rebirth relevance 0.79 · 17.4% (63 of 362 decks)
- Incarnation Technique relevance 0.78 · 18.0% (65 of 362 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (99 of 362 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.57 · 16.0% (58 of 362 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (52 of 362 decks)
- Restart Sequence relevance 0.56 · 13.0% (47 of 362 decks)
- Twilight's Call relevance 0.55 · 8.3% (30 of 362 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Port of Karfell relevance 0.70 · 23.2% (84 of 362 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.70 · 23.5% (85 of 362 decks)
- Tomb Fortress relevance 0.70 · 13.5% (49 of 362 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.54 · 19.6% (71 of 362 decks)
EDH data for Soul Exchange: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 362 real decks.