Ravenous Lindwurm
Played in 59 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
6.8% Gruul
- Green 591 · 67.9%
- Gruul 59 · 6.8%
- Selesnya 41 · 4.7%
- Golgari 41 · 4.7%
- Simic 37 · 4.3%
- Naya 34 · 3.9%
- Other (9) 67 · 7.7%
All commanders (1)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 2.65 · 1.7% (31 of 1,844 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 2.17 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.63 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.63 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Skyscythe Engulfer relevance 1.58 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.56 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 1.49 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 1.49 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 1.44 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.41 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 1.41 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 1.39 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 1.39 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 1.27 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 1.26 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.26 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 1.25 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.19 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.16 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.15 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 1.14 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.08 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.06 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.98 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.94 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.93 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Territorial Bruntar relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.90 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
All creatures (49)
- Colossal Dreadmaw relevance 2.17 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Greater Sandwurm relevance 1.63 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Balamb T-Rexaur relevance 1.63 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Skyscythe Engulfer relevance 1.58 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Seismic Monstrosaur relevance 1.56 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Migrating Ketradon relevance 1.49 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Flourishing Hunter relevance 1.49 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Timberland Ancient relevance 1.44 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Oliphaunt relevance 1.41 · 33.9% (20 of 59 decks)
- Galewind Moose relevance 1.41 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Cavern Stomper relevance 1.39 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 1.39 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Ripscale Predator relevance 1.27 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Gargadon relevance 1.26 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Orchard Strider relevance 1.26 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Earthshaker Dreadmaw relevance 1.25 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Inferno Titan relevance 1.19 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Earth-Cult Elemental relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Burning Sun's Avatar relevance 1.17 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 1.16 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Slavering Branchsnapper relevance 1.15 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Cleanup Crew relevance 1.14 · 22.0% (13 of 59 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 1.08 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Combustible Gearhulk relevance 1.06 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Bramble Wurm relevance 0.98 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Kulrath Zealot relevance 0.95 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Krosan Tusker relevance 0.94 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Spitebellows relevance 0.93 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Territorial Bruntar relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Boarding Party relevance 0.90 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.89 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Aberration relevance 0.86 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Cyclops of Eternal Fury relevance 0.84 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Pelakka Wurm relevance 0.84 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Nessian Wilds Ravager relevance 0.82 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Topiary Panther relevance 0.82 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Glacier Godmaw relevance 0.82 · 18.6% (11 of 59 decks)
- Stormkeld Vanguard // Bear Down relevance 0.81 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Gladiolus Amicitia relevance 0.79 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Realm Seekers relevance 0.77 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Saber-Tooth Moose-Lion relevance 0.75 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Greater Tanuki relevance 0.73 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.73 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.67 · 15.3% (9 of 59 decks)
- Soul of the Harvest relevance 0.63 · 20.3% (12 of 59 decks)
- Dawnglade Regent relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Rhino, Barreling Brute relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Titanoth Rex relevance 0.59 · 13.6% (8 of 59 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.58 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
All lands (1)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.62 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
EDH data for Ravenous Lindwurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59 real decks.