530+17+2+5+16+8+2+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Saruman of Many Colors 9.6% of decks
Saruman of Many Colors 9.6% of decks
The Celestial Toymaker 6.9% of decks
The Celestial Toymaker 6.9% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 16.7% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor 16.7% of decks
Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 20.0% of decks
Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker 20.0% of decks
The Eleventh Doctor // Vislor Turlough 9.1% of decks
The Eleventh Doctor // Vislor Turlough 9.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Storm of Saruman 30.6% of decks
Storm of Saruman 30.6% of decks
Archmage Emeritus 47.2% of decks
Archmage Emeritus 47.2% of decks
Press the Enemy 26.5% of decks
Press the Enemy 26.5% of decks
Consuming Aberration 23.5% of decks
Consuming Aberration 23.5% of decks
The Water Crystal 24.5% of decks
The Water Crystal 24.5% of decks
Archmage of Runes 21.3% of decks
Archmage of Runes 21.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Saruman of Many Colors relevance 3.66 · 9.6% (340 of 3,532 decks)
- The Celestial Toymaker relevance 2.70 · 6.9% (114 of 1,642 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 1.01 · 16.7% (3 of 18 decks)
- Nocturno of Myra's Marvels // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 0.53 · 20.0% (1 of 5 decks)
- The Eleventh Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 0.43 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 1.31 · 30.6% (298 of 975 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 1.14 · 47.2% (460 of 975 decks)
- Press the Enemy relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (258 of 975 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.00 · 23.5% (229 of 975 decks)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.92 · 24.5% (239 of 975 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.91 · 21.3% (208 of 975 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (210 of 975 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 0.87 · 20.3% (198 of 975 decks)
- Alisaie Leveilleur relevance 0.86 · 35.8% (349 of 975 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 0.86 · 17.5% (171 of 975 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.85 · 15.2% (148 of 975 decks)
- Uthros Psionicist relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (163 of 975 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.82 · 48.9% (477 of 975 decks)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.81 · 17.6% (172 of 975 decks)
- Alphinaud Leveilleur relevance 0.80 · 31.7% (309 of 975 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.79 · 17.0% (166 of 975 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (156 of 975 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.76 · 15.9% (155 of 975 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.75 · 19.5% (190 of 975 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.74 · 29.1% (284 of 975 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.72 · 13.4% (131 of 975 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.72 · 26.2% (255 of 975 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (127 of 975 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (137 of 975 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (148 of 975 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.64 · 14.9% (145 of 975 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.63 · 18.2% (177 of 975 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.62 · 16.0% (156 of 975 decks)
- Monk Class relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (106 of 975 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (169 of 975 decks)
All creatures (17)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 1.14 · 47.2% (460 of 975 decks)
- Consuming Aberration relevance 1.00 · 23.5% (229 of 975 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.91 · 21.3% (208 of 975 decks)
- Gríma, Saruman's Footman relevance 0.87 · 20.3% (198 of 975 decks)
- Alisaie Leveilleur relevance 0.86 · 35.8% (349 of 975 decks)
- Taigam, Master Opportunist relevance 0.85 · 15.2% (148 of 975 decks)
- Uthros Psionicist relevance 0.84 · 16.7% (163 of 975 decks)
- Alphinaud Leveilleur relevance 0.80 · 31.7% (309 of 975 decks)
- Ruin Crab relevance 0.79 · 17.0% (166 of 975 decks)
- Lord of the Nazgûl relevance 0.60 · 10.3% (100 of 975 decks)
- Gollum, Scheming Guide relevance 0.58 · 11.3% (110 of 975 decks)
- Lyse Hext relevance 0.56 · 23.6% (230 of 975 decks)
- The Mindskinner relevance 0.56 · 11.4% (111 of 975 decks)
- Exhibition Tidecaller relevance 0.56 · 10.1% (98 of 975 decks)
- Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff relevance 0.55 · 29.9% (292 of 975 decks)
- The Council of Four relevance 0.55 · 14.9% (145 of 975 decks)
- Papalymo Totolymo relevance 0.54 · 24.0% (234 of 975 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- The Water Crystal relevance 0.92 · 24.5% (239 of 975 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.56 · 20.8% (203 of 975 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Storm of Saruman relevance 1.31 · 30.6% (298 of 975 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.67 · 15.2% (148 of 975 decks)
- Monk Class relevance 0.61 · 10.9% (106 of 975 decks)
- Fight or Flight relevance 0.59 · 11.3% (110 of 975 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.58 · 14.8% (144 of 975 decks)
All instants (16)
- Press the Enemy relevance 1.03 · 26.5% (258 of 975 decks)
- Drown in the Loch relevance 0.89 · 21.5% (210 of 975 decks)
- Memory Plunder relevance 0.86 · 17.5% (171 of 975 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.82 · 48.9% (477 of 975 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 0.76 · 15.9% (155 of 975 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.74 · 29.1% (284 of 975 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.72 · 26.2% (255 of 975 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 0.71 · 13.0% (127 of 975 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (137 of 975 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.63 · 18.2% (177 of 975 decks)
- Consider relevance 0.62 · 16.0% (156 of 975 decks)
- Fact or Fiction relevance 0.60 · 17.3% (169 of 975 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 0.57 · 28.9% (282 of 975 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.57 · 13.6% (133 of 975 decks)
- Truth or Tale relevance 0.56 · 10.8% (105 of 975 decks)
- Dig Through Time relevance 0.55 · 21.1% (206 of 975 decks)
All sorceries (8)
- Maddening Cacophony relevance 0.81 · 17.6% (172 of 975 decks)
- Fractured Sanity relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (156 of 975 decks)
- Singularity Rupture relevance 0.75 · 19.5% (190 of 975 decks)
- Sorcerous Squall relevance 0.72 · 13.4% (131 of 975 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.64 · 14.9% (145 of 975 decks)
- Breach the Multiverse relevance 0.59 · 16.4% (160 of 975 decks)
- Make an Example relevance 0.55 · 11.1% (108 of 975 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.54 · 16.1% (157 of 975 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.61 · 18.2% (177 of 975 decks)
- Jidoor, Aristocratic Capital // Overture relevance 0.57 · 12.6% (123 of 975 decks)
EDH data for Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 975 real decks.















































