Lotus Blossom
Played in 142 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
2.9% Witch-Maw
- Grixis 915 · 19.0%
- Five-Color 380 · 7.9%
- Izzet 327 · 6.8%
- Golgari 275 · 5.7%
- Blue 256 · 5.3%
- Red 228 · 4.7%
- Black 220 · 4.6%
- White 182 · 3.8%
- Esper 156 · 3.2%
- Dimir 146 · 3.0%
- Colorless 143 · 3.0%
- Witch-Maw 142 · 2.9%
- Azorius 134 · 2.8%
- Jeskai 133 · 2.8%
- Simic 120 · 2.5%
- Naya 120 · 2.5%
- Bant 117 · 2.4%
- Orzhov 107 · 2.2%
- Rakdos 103 · 2.1%
- Other (13) 624 · 12.9%
All most relevant (29)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.15 · 46.5% (66 of 142 decks)
- Jar of Eyeballs relevance 1.11 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Mercadian Lift relevance 1.11 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Azor's Elocutors relevance 1.05 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Archery Training relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Icatian Moneychanger relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Hoofprints of the Stag relevance 0.98 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.93 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Musician relevance 0.91 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Component Pouch relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Intrepid Adversary relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Essence Bottle relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Legacy's Allure relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Heliod's Punishment relevance 0.85 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.82 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Pyramid of the Pantheon relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Dawn of a New Age relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Bandit's Haul relevance 0.76 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.75 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Grimoire of the Dead relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Nine-Lives Familiar relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.68 · 42.3% (60 of 142 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.67 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.64 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
All creatures (8)
- Azor's Elocutors relevance 1.05 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Icatian Moneychanger relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Musician relevance 0.91 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Intrepid Adversary relevance 0.90 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 0.83 · 18.3% (26 of 142 decks)
- Drake Hatcher relevance 0.75 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Nine-Lives Familiar relevance 0.73 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.64 · 35.2% (50 of 142 decks)
All artifacts (12)
- Replicating Ring relevance 1.15 · 46.5% (66 of 142 decks)
- Jar of Eyeballs relevance 1.11 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Mercadian Lift relevance 1.11 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Component Pouch relevance 0.91 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Essence Bottle relevance 0.87 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Pyramid of the Pantheon relevance 0.77 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Bandit's Haul relevance 0.76 · 11.3% (16 of 142 decks)
- Grimoire of the Dead relevance 0.73 · 12.7% (18 of 142 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.68 · 42.3% (60 of 142 decks)
- Oracle's Vault relevance 0.66 · 12.0% (17 of 142 decks)
- Strixhaven Stadium relevance 0.66 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.63 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Archery Training relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Hoofprints of the Stag relevance 0.98 · 16.9% (24 of 142 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 0.93 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Legacy's Allure relevance 0.86 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Heliod's Punishment relevance 0.85 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.82 · 17.6% (25 of 142 decks)
- Dawn of a New Age relevance 0.76 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Curse of Vengeance relevance 0.69 · 10.6% (15 of 142 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.67 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.64 · 23.9% (34 of 142 decks)
All lands (20)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 1.01 · 20.4% (29 of 142 decks)
- Fountain of Cho relevance 1.01 · 19.0% (27 of 142 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.94 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Hickory Woodlot relevance 0.94 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.90 · 22.5% (32 of 142 decks)
- Remote Farm relevance 0.90 · 21.8% (31 of 142 decks)
- Calciform Pools relevance 0.89 · 23.9% (34 of 142 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.89 · 30.3% (43 of 142 decks)
- Rushwood Grove relevance 0.86 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Bottomless Vault relevance 0.85 · 16.2% (23 of 142 decks)
- Subterranean Hangar relevance 0.83 · 15.5% (22 of 142 decks)
- Dreadship Reef relevance 0.81 · 24.6% (35 of 142 decks)
- Saprazzan Cove relevance 0.80 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Icatian Store relevance 0.80 · 14.8% (21 of 142 decks)
- Saltcrusted Steppe relevance 0.78 · 21.1% (30 of 142 decks)
- Sand Silos relevance 0.75 · 14.1% (20 of 142 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.72 · 23.2% (33 of 142 decks)
- Hollow Trees relevance 0.72 · 13.4% (19 of 142 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 0.68 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
- Vivid Meadow relevance 0.66 · 19.7% (28 of 142 decks)
EDH data for Lotus Blossom: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 142 real decks.