Late to Dinner
Played in 256 Mardu decks
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (5)
- Piru, the Volatile relevance 1.60 · 1.7% (19 of 1,102 decks)
- Ravos, Soultender // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.74 · 3.7% (2 of 54 decks)
- Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.62 · 12.5% (1 of 8 decks)
- Tormod, the Desecrator // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (1 of 34 decks)
- Akiri, Line-Slinger // Keskit, the Flesh Sculptor relevance 0.40 · 2.2% (1 of 46 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Unburial Rites relevance 1.13 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
- Zombify relevance 1.08 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.02 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Resurrection relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (37 of 256 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.70 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Priest of Fell Rites relevance 0.68 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.66 · 27.7% (71 of 256 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (57 of 256 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.54 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Exhume relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.51 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.51 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.51 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Ashen Rider relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Rite of the Moth relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Reya Dawnbringer relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.45 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Chainer, Nightmare Adept relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
All creatures (14)
- Priest of Fell Rites relevance 0.68 · 26.2% (67 of 256 decks)
- Karmic Guide relevance 0.53 · 20.7% (53 of 256 decks)
- Sheoldred, Whispering One relevance 0.52 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Gisela, Blade of Goldnight relevance 0.51 · 24.6% (63 of 256 decks)
- Ashen Rider relevance 0.49 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
- Angel of the Ruins relevance 0.47 · 15.6% (40 of 256 decks)
- Reya Dawnbringer relevance 0.45 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Anger relevance 0.43 · 18.8% (48 of 256 decks)
- Rune-Scarred Demon relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Avacyn, Angel of Hope relevance 0.41 · 16.0% (41 of 256 decks)
- Chainer, Nightmare Adept relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Archon of Cruelty relevance 0.39 · 9.4% (24 of 256 decks)
- Drakuseth, Maw of Flames relevance 0.39 · 12.1% (31 of 256 decks)
- Valgavoth's Faithful relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (14 of 256 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.54 · 24.2% (62 of 256 decks)
- Boros Signet relevance 0.41 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Rakdos Signet relevance 0.40 · 27.3% (70 of 256 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.40 · 28.9% (74 of 256 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Animate Dead relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (57 of 256 decks)
- Bitter Reunion relevance 0.51 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
- Rakdos Joins Up relevance 0.36 · 8.6% (22 of 256 decks)
All instants (3)
- Thrill of Possibility relevance 0.51 · 18.4% (47 of 256 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.39 · 19.9% (51 of 256 decks)
- Demand Answers relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Unburial Rites relevance 1.13 · 28.5% (73 of 256 decks)
- Zombify relevance 1.08 · 22.7% (58 of 256 decks)
- Dread Return relevance 1.02 · 25.4% (65 of 256 decks)
- Resurrection relevance 0.99 · 14.5% (37 of 256 decks)
- Faithless Looting relevance 0.70 · 35.5% (91 of 256 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.67 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.66 · 27.7% (71 of 256 decks)
- Cathartic Reunion relevance 0.60 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Exhume relevance 0.54 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.51 · 31.3% (80 of 256 decks)
- Thrilling Discovery relevance 0.50 · 11.7% (30 of 256 decks)
- Rite of the Moth relevance 0.47 · 7.0% (18 of 256 decks)
- Stitch Together relevance 0.45 · 16.4% (42 of 256 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 0.44 · 16.8% (43 of 256 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.39 · 11.3% (29 of 256 decks)
- Bone Shards relevance 0.35 · 6.6% (17 of 256 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Shattered Landscape relevance 0.41 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Temple of Triumph relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.38 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
All lands (7)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.46 · 30.9% (79 of 256 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.41 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Thriving Bluff relevance 0.39 · 10.2% (26 of 256 decks)
- Bloodfell Caves relevance 0.35 · 13.3% (34 of 256 decks)
- Rugged Prairie relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (56 of 256 decks)
- Boros Garrison relevance 0.35 · 14.1% (36 of 256 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.34 · 12.5% (32 of 256 decks)
EDH data for Late to Dinner: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 256 real decks.