Sickening Shoal
Played in 62 Esper decks
Color Identity Spread
4.8% Esper
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Misdirection relevance 2.42 · 69.4% (43 of 62 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 2.16 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 2.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 1.80 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Submerge relevance 1.74 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Ravenous Trap relevance 1.71 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Abolish relevance 1.46 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Foil relevance 1.45 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Reverent Mantra relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 1.32 · 67.7% (42 of 62 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 1.25 · 71.0% (44 of 62 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.23 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.11 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Helm of the Ghastlord relevance 1.08 · 40.3% (25 of 62 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.06 · 43.5% (27 of 62 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.06 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 1.00 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.00 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.94 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Delney, Streetwise Lookout relevance 0.93 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.93 · 35.5% (22 of 62 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.93 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.91 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.86 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Massacre relevance 0.83 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.81 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.80 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.79 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
Creatures
3
Creatures
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All creatures (3)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 1.00 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Delney, Streetwise Lookout relevance 0.93 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff relevance 0.71 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
Artifacts
4
Artifacts
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All artifacts (4)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.94 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.78 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.75 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.68 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
Enchantments
5
Enchantments
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All enchantments (5)
- Ophidian Eye relevance 1.11 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Helm of the Ghastlord relevance 1.08 · 40.3% (25 of 62 decks)
- Bloodchief Ascension relevance 0.93 · 35.5% (22 of 62 decks)
- Curiosity relevance 0.91 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.67 · 40.3% (25 of 62 decks)
Instants
22
Instants
22 Showing 1-10 of 22
Page size
All instants (22)
- Misdirection relevance 2.42 · 69.4% (43 of 62 decks)
- Disrupting Shoal relevance 2.16 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Force of Despair relevance 2.14 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 1.80 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Submerge relevance 1.74 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Ravenous Trap relevance 1.71 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 1.49 · 50.0% (31 of 62 decks)
- Abolish relevance 1.46 · 22.6% (14 of 62 decks)
- Foil relevance 1.45 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Reverent Mantra relevance 1.44 · 21.0% (13 of 62 decks)
- Snuff Out relevance 1.32 · 67.7% (42 of 62 decks)
- Deadly Rollick relevance 1.25 · 71.0% (44 of 62 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 1.23 · 56.5% (35 of 62 decks)
- Dismember relevance 1.06 · 43.5% (27 of 62 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 1.06 · 48.4% (30 of 62 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.93 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.86 · 16.1% (10 of 62 decks)
- Unwind relevance 0.81 · 32.3% (20 of 62 decks)
- Rewind relevance 0.80 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.79 · 46.8% (29 of 62 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.72 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.68 · 19.4% (12 of 62 decks)
Sorceries
3
Sorceries
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All sorceries (3)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 1.00 · 30.6% (19 of 62 decks)
- Quantum Misalignment relevance 0.86 · 25.8% (16 of 62 decks)
- Massacre relevance 0.83 · 14.5% (9 of 62 decks)
Utility Lands
6
Utility Lands
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All utility lands (6)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.91 · 45.2% (28 of 62 decks)
- Waterlogged Teachings // Inundated Archive relevance 0.88 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.87 · 37.1% (23 of 62 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.77 · 38.7% (24 of 62 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.73 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.71 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
Lands
7
Lands
7 Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All lands (7)
- City of Brass relevance 0.79 · 41.9% (26 of 62 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.71 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.70 · 35.5% (22 of 62 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.70 · 35.5% (22 of 62 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.67 · 33.9% (21 of 62 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.67 · 27.4% (17 of 62 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.66 · 29.0% (18 of 62 decks)
EDH data for Sickening Shoal: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 62 real decks.