Silklash Spider
Played in 359 Jund decks
430+26+3+4+4+4+1+4+4+
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Jund
Commanders
Most Relevant
Ishkanah, Grafwidow 46.5% of decks
Ishkanah, Grafwidow 46.5% of decks
Rotwidow Pack 38.4% of decks
Rotwidow Pack 38.4% of decks
Arasta of the Endless Web 53.5% of decks
Arasta of the Endless Web 53.5% of decks
Shelob, Child of Ungoliant 44.8% of decks
Shelob, Child of Ungoliant 44.8% of decks
Spider Spawning 34.5% of decks
Spider Spawning 34.5% of decks
Hatchery Spider 29.5% of decks
Hatchery Spider 29.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Thantis, the Warweaver relevance 3.29 · 4.9% (195 of 3,940 decks)
- Prossh, Skyraider of Kher relevance 2.12 · 2.2% (84 of 3,822 decks)
- Xira Arien relevance 0.61 · 1.2% (4 of 326 decks)
- Darigaaz, the Igniter relevance 0.42 · 1.3% (2 of 159 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 2.67 · 46.5% (167 of 359 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 2.41 · 38.4% (138 of 359 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 2.19 · 53.5% (192 of 359 decks)
- Shelob, Child of Ungoliant relevance 2.14 · 44.8% (161 of 359 decks)
- Spider Spawning relevance 2.10 · 34.5% (124 of 359 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 2.01 · 29.5% (106 of 359 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 1.97 · 35.7% (128 of 359 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.95 · 32.9% (118 of 359 decks)
- Dragonlair Spider relevance 1.94 · 47.6% (171 of 359 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 1.85 · 27.6% (99 of 359 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 1.81 · 26.7% (96 of 359 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 1.81 · 27.6% (99 of 359 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 1.78 · 48.7% (175 of 359 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 1.78 · 29.0% (104 of 359 decks)
- Drider relevance 1.74 · 27.0% (97 of 359 decks)
- Skyfisher Spider relevance 1.68 · 30.4% (109 of 359 decks)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 1.66 · 31.5% (113 of 359 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.58 · 26.5% (95 of 359 decks)
- Doom Weaver relevance 1.49 · 26.2% (94 of 359 decks)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 1.48 · 25.3% (91 of 359 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (76 of 359 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (116 of 359 decks)
- Quagmire Druid relevance 1.37 · 20.1% (72 of 359 decks)
- Spoils of Victory relevance 1.35 · 20.9% (75 of 359 decks)
- Stronghold Assassin relevance 1.34 · 22.0% (79 of 359 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 1.31 · 34.0% (122 of 359 decks)
- Reincarnation relevance 1.30 · 19.8% (71 of 359 decks)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 1.29 · 18.9% (68 of 359 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 1.25 · 19.2% (69 of 359 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 1.20 · 18.7% (67 of 359 decks)
All creatures (26)
- Ishkanah, Grafwidow relevance 2.67 · 46.5% (167 of 359 decks)
- Rotwidow Pack relevance 2.41 · 38.4% (138 of 359 decks)
- Arasta of the Endless Web relevance 2.19 · 53.5% (192 of 359 decks)
- Shelob, Child of Ungoliant relevance 2.14 · 44.8% (161 of 359 decks)
- Hatchery Spider relevance 2.01 · 29.5% (106 of 359 decks)
- Shelob, Dread Weaver relevance 1.97 · 35.7% (128 of 359 decks)
- Deadly Recluse relevance 1.95 · 32.9% (118 of 359 decks)
- Dragonlair Spider relevance 1.94 · 47.6% (171 of 359 decks)
- Twin-Silk Spider relevance 1.85 · 27.6% (99 of 359 decks)
- Penumbra Spider relevance 1.81 · 26.7% (96 of 359 decks)
- Watcher in the Web relevance 1.81 · 27.6% (99 of 359 decks)
- Sporeweb Weaver relevance 1.78 · 29.0% (104 of 359 decks)
- Drider relevance 1.74 · 27.0% (97 of 359 decks)
- Skyfisher Spider relevance 1.68 · 30.4% (109 of 359 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 1.58 · 26.5% (95 of 359 decks)
- Doom Weaver relevance 1.49 · 26.2% (94 of 359 decks)
- Sweet-Gum Recluse relevance 1.43 · 21.2% (76 of 359 decks)
- Spinner of Souls relevance 1.39 · 32.3% (116 of 359 decks)
- Quagmire Druid relevance 1.37 · 20.1% (72 of 359 decks)
- Stronghold Assassin relevance 1.34 · 22.0% (79 of 359 decks)
- Twitching Doll relevance 1.31 · 34.0% (122 of 359 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 1.20 · 18.7% (67 of 359 decks)
- Deathbringer Thoctar relevance 1.20 · 24.5% (88 of 359 decks)
- Scarland Thrinax relevance 1.17 · 20.1% (72 of 359 decks)
- Endless Cockroaches relevance 1.16 · 18.9% (68 of 359 decks)
- Hua Tuo, Honored Physician relevance 1.06 · 19.5% (70 of 359 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Spine of Ish Sah relevance 1.29 · 18.9% (68 of 359 decks)
- Armillary Sphere relevance 1.25 · 19.2% (69 of 359 decks)
- Obelisk of Jund relevance 1.19 · 23.4% (84 of 359 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Curse of Clinging Webs relevance 1.48 · 25.3% (91 of 359 decks)
- Tooth and Claw relevance 1.18 · 17.5% (63 of 359 decks)
- Curse of Predation relevance 1.13 · 17.0% (61 of 359 decks)
- Curse of Shallow Graves relevance 1.07 · 16.2% (58 of 359 decks)
All instants (4)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 1.78 · 48.7% (175 of 359 decks)
- Reincarnation relevance 1.30 · 19.8% (71 of 359 decks)
- Jund Charm relevance 1.13 · 21.7% (78 of 359 decks)
- Terrifying Presence relevance 1.09 · 19.8% (71 of 359 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Spider Spawning relevance 2.10 · 34.5% (124 of 359 decks)
- Spoils of Victory relevance 1.35 · 20.9% (75 of 359 decks)
- Mass Mutiny relevance 1.13 · 19.8% (71 of 359 decks)
- Restore relevance 1.09 · 16.2% (58 of 359 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Lolth, Spider Queen relevance 1.66 · 31.5% (113 of 359 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 1.29 · 20.6% (74 of 359 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 1.23 · 25.1% (90 of 359 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 1.20 · 25.3% (91 of 359 decks)
- Swarmyard relevance 1.13 · 29.0% (104 of 359 decks)
All lands (4)
- Vivid Grove relevance 1.32 · 22.8% (82 of 359 decks)
- Akoum Refuge relevance 1.23 · 26.2% (94 of 359 decks)
- Rupture Spire relevance 1.21 · 19.8% (71 of 359 decks)
- Rakdos Guildgate relevance 1.08 · 24.0% (86 of 359 decks)
EDH data for Silklash Spider: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 359 real decks.














































