Redwood Treefolk

Played in 39 Selesnya decks

Redwood Treefolk
$0.05 €0.11

Color Identity Spread

Commanders

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All commanders (1)
  1. Syr Joshua and Syr Saxon relevance 1.00 · 50.0% (1 of 2 decks)

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Panther Warriors
    2.12 38.5%
    $0.18 €0.04
  • Craw Wurm
    2.04 30.8%
    $0.12 €0.02
  • Grizzly Bears
    2.00 41.0%
    $0.22 €0.11
  • Savannah Lions
    1.92 48.7%
    $0.16 €0.11
  • Terrian, World Tyrant
    1.81 46.2%
    $0.35 €0.16
  • Muraganda Petroglyphs
    1.80 46.2%
    $0.74 €0.39
  • Quakestrider Ceratops
    1.77 46.2%
    $0.28 €0.14
  • Primordial Wurm
    1.76 41.0%
    $0.07 €0.02
  • Centaur Courser
    1.69 28.2%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Ruxa, Patient Professor
    1.68 43.6%
    $5.15 €7.28
All most relevant (30)
  1. Panther Warriors relevance 2.12 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
  2. Craw Wurm relevance 2.04 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  3. Grizzly Bears relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  4. Savannah Lions relevance 1.92 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
  5. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.81 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  6. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.80 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  7. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.77 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  8. Primordial Wurm relevance 1.76 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  9. Centaur Courser relevance 1.69 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  10. Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
  11. Gigantosaurus relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
  12. Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.59 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  13. Watchwolf relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  14. Balduvian Bears relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  15. Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  16. Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.54 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  17. Elvish Ranger relevance 1.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  18. Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.49 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  19. Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.42 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  20. Vorstclaw relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  21. Nessian Courser relevance 1.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  22. Barbtooth Wurm relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  23. Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.26 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  24. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  25. Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  26. Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.22 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  27. Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.18 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  28. Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.16 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  29. Orazca Frillback relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  30. Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)

Creatures

35

Showing 1-10 of 35

Page size
  • Panther Warriors
    2.12 38.5%
    $0.18 €0.04
  • Craw Wurm
    2.04 30.8%
    $0.12 €0.02
  • Grizzly Bears
    2.00 41.0%
    $0.22 €0.11
  • Savannah Lions
    1.92 48.7%
    $0.16 €0.11
  • Terrian, World Tyrant
    1.81 46.2%
    $0.35 €0.16
  • Quakestrider Ceratops
    1.77 46.2%
    $0.28 €0.14
  • Primordial Wurm
    1.76 41.0%
    $0.07 €0.02
  • Centaur Courser
    1.69 28.2%
    $0.12 €0.05
  • Ruxa, Patient Professor
    1.68 43.6%
    $5.15 €7.28
  • Gigantosaurus
    1.68 43.6%
    $3.49 €1.55
All creatures (35)
  1. Panther Warriors relevance 2.12 · 38.5% (15 of 39 decks)
  2. Craw Wurm relevance 2.04 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  3. Grizzly Bears relevance 2.00 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  4. Savannah Lions relevance 1.92 · 48.7% (19 of 39 decks)
  5. Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 1.81 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  6. Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 1.77 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  7. Primordial Wurm relevance 1.76 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  8. Centaur Courser relevance 1.69 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  9. Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
  10. Gigantosaurus relevance 1.68 · 43.6% (17 of 39 decks)
  11. Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.59 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  12. Watchwolf relevance 1.58 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  13. Balduvian Bears relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  14. Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.56 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  15. Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.54 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  16. Elvish Ranger relevance 1.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  17. Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.49 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  18. Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.42 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  19. Vorstclaw relevance 1.39 · 33.3% (13 of 39 decks)
  20. Nessian Courser relevance 1.36 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  21. Barbtooth Wurm relevance 1.28 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  22. Grizzled Leotau relevance 1.26 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  23. Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  24. Leatherback Baloth relevance 1.24 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  25. Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.22 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  26. Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.18 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  27. Kalonian Tusker relevance 1.16 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  28. Orazca Frillback relevance 1.13 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  29. Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.10 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  30. Prowling Caracal relevance 1.07 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  31. Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.06 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
  32. Raptor Companion relevance 1.05 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
  33. Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.05 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  34. Devilthorn Fox relevance 1.04 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
  35. Terrain Elemental relevance 0.89 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)

Artifacts

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Lightning Greaves
    0.50 25.6%
    $3.96 €4.25
  • Swiftfoot Boots
    0.43 28.2%
    $1.48 €0.96
All artifacts (2)
  1. Lightning Greaves relevance 0.50 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  2. Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.43 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)

Enchantments

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Muraganda Petroglyphs
    1.80 46.2%
    $0.74 €0.39
  • Unnatural Growth
    0.88 30.8%
    $3.89 €1.57
  • Primeval Bounty
    0.81 20.5%
    $0.30 €0.31
  • Anthem of Champions
    0.77 25.6%
    $0.32 €0.26
  • Beastmaster Ascension
    0.63 28.2%
    $6.91 €3.97
  • Mirari's Wake
    0.45 28.2%
    $7.37 €4.26
All enchantments (6)
  1. Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 1.80 · 46.2% (18 of 39 decks)
  2. Unnatural Growth relevance 0.88 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  3. Primeval Bounty relevance 0.81 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)
  4. Anthem of Champions relevance 0.77 · 25.6% (10 of 39 decks)
  5. Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.63 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  6. Mirari's Wake relevance 0.45 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)

Instants

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Fog
    0.86 30.8%
    $1.01 €0.25
  • Return of the Wildspeaker
    0.48 20.5%
    $2.71 €1.15
All instants (2)
  1. Fog relevance 0.86 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)
  2. Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.48 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)

Sorceries

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Rampant Growth
    0.54 41.0%
    $1.14 €0.56
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.37 23.1%
    $1.83 €1.54
  • Three Visits
    0.34 20.5%
    $5.60 €4.82
All sorceries (3)
  1. Rampant Growth relevance 0.54 · 41.0% (16 of 39 decks)
  2. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.37 · 23.1% (9 of 39 decks)
  3. Three Visits relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (8 of 39 decks)

Lands

2

Showing 1-2 of 2

Page size
  • Evolving Wilds
    0.50 28.2%
    $0.28 €0.13
  • Blossoming Sands
    0.47 30.8%
    $0.21 €0.02
All lands (2)
  1. Evolving Wilds relevance 0.50 · 28.2% (11 of 39 decks)
  2. Blossoming Sands relevance 0.47 · 30.8% (12 of 39 decks)

EDH data for Redwood Treefolk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 39 real decks.