Prismatic Ending
Played in 112 Witch-Maw decks
Color Identity Spread
2.5% Witch-Maw
- Five-Color 1,422 · 32.2%
- Esper 527 · 11.9%
- Bant 475 · 10.8%
- Jeskai 346 · 7.8%
- Ink-Treader 218 · 4.9%
- Azorius 215 · 4.9%
- Mardu 172 · 3.9%
- Orzhov 153 · 3.5%
- Naya 152 · 3.4%
- White 125 · 2.8%
- Selesnya 123 · 2.8%
- Yore-Tiller 120 · 2.7%
- Boros 115 · 2.6%
- Witch-Maw 112 · 2.5%
- Abzan 102 · 2.3%
- Other (9) 36 · 0.8%
All commanders (1)
- Thrasios, Triton Hero // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.43 · 1.1% (3 of 275 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.19 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 1.16 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.11 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.06 · 37.5% (42 of 112 decks)
- Leyline Binding relevance 1.05 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.02 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Kaya's Guile relevance 1.02 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.98 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.90 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.90 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- No More Lies relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.88 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.88 · 22.3% (25 of 112 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.87 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.87 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.87 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.86 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.86 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (28 of 112 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 0.86 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.82 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.80 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.80 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Snapcaster Mage relevance 0.90 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Solitude relevance 0.90 · 21.4% (24 of 112 decks)
- Psychic Frog relevance 0.86 · 17.9% (20 of 112 decks)
- Subtlety relevance 0.76 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Ancient Cornucopia relevance 0.60 · 10.7% (12 of 112 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Leyline Binding relevance 1.05 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Dream Halls relevance 0.66 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
All instants (24)
- Fatal Push relevance 1.19 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Mana Tithe relevance 1.16 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 1.06 · 37.5% (42 of 112 decks)
- Cut Down relevance 1.02 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Kaya's Guile relevance 1.02 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Cling to Dust relevance 1.02 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Lose Focus relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Force Spike relevance 0.98 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Wash Away relevance 0.98 · 19.6% (22 of 112 decks)
- Remand relevance 0.96 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Reprieve relevance 0.90 · 18.8% (21 of 112 decks)
- No More Lies relevance 0.88 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.88 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Consult the Star Charts relevance 0.87 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Memory Lapse relevance 0.87 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Tale's End relevance 0.86 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Long Goodbye relevance 0.86 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
- Rakshasa's Bargain relevance 0.82 · 13.4% (15 of 112 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.82 · 15.2% (17 of 112 decks)
- Spell Snare relevance 0.80 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
- Sauron's Ransom relevance 0.80 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Evasive Action relevance 0.78 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.63 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.63 · 12.5% (14 of 112 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 1.11 · 23.2% (26 of 112 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.88 · 22.3% (25 of 112 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.87 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.86 · 25.0% (28 of 112 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.62 · 14.3% (16 of 112 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Tamiyo, Inquisitive Student // Tamiyo, Seasoned Scholar relevance 0.88 · 20.5% (23 of 112 decks)
All utility lands (5)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.94 · 27.7% (31 of 112 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.93 · 30.4% (34 of 112 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.86 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.77 · 16.1% (18 of 112 decks)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 0.67 · 11.6% (13 of 112 decks)
All lands (7)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.86 · 35.7% (40 of 112 decks)
- Wooded Foothills relevance 0.73 · 36.6% (41 of 112 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.71 · 33.0% (37 of 112 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.65 · 33.9% (38 of 112 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.64 · 17.0% (19 of 112 decks)
- Drowned Catacomb relevance 0.64 · 24.1% (27 of 112 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.61 · 26.8% (30 of 112 decks)
EDH data for Prismatic Ending: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 112 real decks.