Nourishing Shoal
Played in 37 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
5.1% Jund
130+12+1+21+3+9+2+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Rograkh, Son of Rohgahh // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.87 · 1.3% (2 of 154 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 2.94 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Mana Flare relevance 2.84 · 81.1% (30 of 37 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 2.79 · 73.0% (27 of 37 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 2.72 · 75.7% (28 of 37 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 2.69 · 73.0% (27 of 37 decks)
- Electrodominance relevance 2.48 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 2.46 · 67.6% (25 of 37 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 2.41 · 62.2% (23 of 37 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 2.37 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 2.36 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Nemata, Grove Guardian relevance 2.31 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 2.26 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Horizon Stone relevance 2.25 · 59.5% (22 of 37 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 2.19 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 2.15 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 2.09 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 2.06 · 64.9% (24 of 37 decks)
- Tectonic Instability relevance 2.06 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 2.05 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 2.04 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 2.03 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 1.95 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.94 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 1.92 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.87 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Gift of Doom relevance 1.80 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Spellshock relevance 1.78 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Oubliette relevance 1.72 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.63 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 1.61 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Lifeblood Hydra relevance 2.94 · 48.6% (18 of 37 decks)
- Zhur-Taa Ancient relevance 2.69 · 73.0% (27 of 37 decks)
- Nemata, Grove Guardian relevance 2.31 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Jade Mage relevance 2.26 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Nyxbloom Ancient relevance 2.15 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Ant Queen relevance 1.92 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Xantcha, Sleeper Agent relevance 1.63 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Slimefoot, the Stowaway relevance 1.58 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Harvester of Souls relevance 1.55 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Magus of the Vineyard relevance 1.33 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Lavaleaper relevance 1.32 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 1.28 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Horizon Stone relevance 2.25 · 59.5% (22 of 37 decks)
All enchantments (21)
- Mana Flare relevance 2.84 · 81.1% (30 of 37 decks)
- Dictate of Karametra relevance 2.79 · 73.0% (27 of 37 decks)
- Heartbeat of Spring relevance 2.72 · 75.7% (28 of 37 decks)
- Overabundance relevance 2.46 · 67.6% (25 of 37 decks)
- Eladamri's Vineyard relevance 2.41 · 62.2% (23 of 37 decks)
- Mana Reflection relevance 2.19 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Tectonic Instability relevance 2.06 · 43.2% (16 of 37 decks)
- Helix Pinnacle relevance 2.05 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- War's Toll relevance 2.04 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Rites of Flourishing relevance 1.95 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Citadel of Pain relevance 1.94 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Manabarbs relevance 1.87 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Gift of Doom relevance 1.80 · 27.0% (10 of 37 decks)
- Spellshock relevance 1.78 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Oubliette relevance 1.72 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 1.61 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Song of the Dryads relevance 1.58 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Wound Reflection relevance 1.42 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Exquisite Blood relevance 1.35 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Kaya's Ghostform relevance 1.30 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
- Power Surge relevance 1.13 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
All instants (3)
- Electrodominance relevance 2.48 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Erebos's Intervention relevance 2.37 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Bedevil relevance 1.22 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Jaya's Immolating Inferno relevance 2.36 · 51.4% (19 of 37 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 2.09 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 2.06 · 64.9% (24 of 37 decks)
- Lavalanche relevance 2.03 · 54.1% (20 of 37 decks)
- Tormenting Voice relevance 1.59 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
- Read the Bones relevance 1.56 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Sign in Blood relevance 1.53 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.32 · 40.5% (15 of 37 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.21 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Barren Moor relevance 1.45 · 32.4% (12 of 37 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 1.38 · 29.7% (11 of 37 decks)
All lands (2)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.48 · 37.8% (14 of 37 decks)
- Cabal Coffers relevance 1.24 · 35.1% (13 of 37 decks)
EDH data for Nourishing Shoal: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 37 real decks.



















































