130+24+1+9+4+2+2+8+
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Witch-Maw
Commanders
Most Relevant
Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 27.6% of decks
Cazur, Ruthless Stalker 27.6% of decks
Ukkima, Stalking Shadow 27.6% of decks
Ukkima, Stalking Shadow 27.6% of decks
Pir, Imaginative Rascal 36.2% of decks
Pir, Imaginative Rascal 36.2% of decks
Toothy, Imaginary Friend 29.3% of decks
Toothy, Imaginary Friend 29.3% of decks
Inspiring Call 37.9% of decks
Inspiring Call 37.9% of decks
Winding Constrictor 29.3% of decks
Winding Constrictor 29.3% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 1.46 · 1.6% (19 of 1,179 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 1.73 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow relevance 1.70 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 1.17 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.14 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.00 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.87 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.82 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.80 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Tidus, Yuna's Guardian relevance 0.74 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.73 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.68 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.68 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.67 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.63 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.62 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.60 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.53 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.48 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Atraxa, Praetors' Voice relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All creatures (24)
- Cazur, Ruthless Stalker relevance 1.73 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Ukkima, Stalking Shadow relevance 1.70 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Pir, Imaginative Rascal relevance 1.17 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 1.14 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.87 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Tidus, Yuna's Guardian relevance 0.74 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.68 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.68 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.63 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.62 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Danny Pink relevance 0.61 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (12 of 58 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.55 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.53 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Atraxa, Praetors' Voice relevance 0.48 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Lae'zel, Vlaakith's Champion relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.41 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.73 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
All enchantments (9)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.82 · 36.2% (21 of 58 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.73 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.67 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 0.52 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Brokers Ascendancy relevance 0.48 · 27.6% (16 of 58 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 0.46 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.44 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.41 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
All instants (4)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.00 · 37.9% (22 of 58 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.60 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Mutational Advantage relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.80 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.43 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.76 · 25.9% (15 of 58 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.46 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
All lands (8)
- Vivid Creek relevance 0.49 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Vivid Grove relevance 0.48 · 15.5% (9 of 58 decks)
- Vivid Marsh relevance 0.47 · 13.8% (8 of 58 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.46 · 29.3% (17 of 58 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.45 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.44 · 22.4% (13 of 58 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.41 · 19.0% (11 of 58 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.39 · 17.2% (10 of 58 decks)
EDH data for Nikara, Lair Scavenger: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 58 real decks.











































