String of Disappearances
Played in 161 Izzet decks
Color Identity Spread
All commanders (2)
- Lutri, the Spellchaser relevance 1.36 · 1.2% (10 of 812 decks)
- Bjorna, Nightfall Alchemist relevance 0.55 · 4.2% (1 of 24 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Unsummon relevance 1.40 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.73 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.72 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.72 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.69 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Shimmer of Possibility relevance 0.65 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Opportunistic Dragon relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Shenanigans relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Faithless Salvaging relevance 0.54 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Lasting Tarfire relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.48 · 37.3% (60 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.48 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Firebolt relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Quench relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Suplex relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Rile relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 34.2% (55 of 161 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.39 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.38 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.72 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Opportunistic Dragon relevance 0.63 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Taurean Mauler relevance 0.43 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Terror of the Peaks relevance 0.38 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Electrostatic Field relevance 0.37 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Demanding Dragon relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
- The Emperor of Palamecia // The Lord Master of Hell relevance 0.36 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Firebrand Archer relevance 0.35 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Perplexing Chimera relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Lasting Tarfire relevance 0.50 · 8.7% (14 of 161 decks)
- Seal of Removal relevance 0.37 · 5.6% (9 of 161 decks)
All instants (21)
- Unsummon relevance 1.40 · 36.6% (59 of 161 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.73 · 14.9% (24 of 161 decks)
- Vapor Snag relevance 0.72 · 13.0% (21 of 161 decks)
- Run Away Together relevance 0.69 · 21.1% (34 of 161 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.64 · 11.8% (19 of 161 decks)
- Stern Dismissal relevance 0.56 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Faithless Salvaging relevance 0.54 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Exclude relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Unexpected Assistance relevance 0.48 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.48 · 37.3% (60 of 161 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.48 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Disdainful Stroke relevance 0.48 · 13.7% (22 of 161 decks)
- Quench relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Alchemist's Retrieval relevance 0.42 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.41 · 34.2% (55 of 161 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.38 · 15.5% (25 of 161 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.38 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.37 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Lightning Bolt relevance 0.35 · 26.7% (43 of 161 decks)
- Feed the Flames relevance 0.35 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Scour All Possibilities relevance 0.72 · 12.4% (20 of 161 decks)
- Shimmer of Possibility relevance 0.65 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Shenanigans relevance 0.56 · 9.3% (15 of 161 decks)
- Firebolt relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (12 of 161 decks)
- Suplex relevance 0.43 · 9.9% (16 of 161 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.43 · 10.6% (17 of 161 decks)
- Rile relevance 0.41 · 6.8% (11 of 161 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.41 · 11.2% (18 of 161 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.39 · 24.2% (39 of 161 decks)
- Tidings relevance 0.38 · 6.2% (10 of 161 decks)
- Reckless Charge relevance 0.35 · 8.1% (13 of 161 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.57 · 18.0% (29 of 161 decks)
- Forgotten Cave relevance 0.56 · 17.4% (28 of 161 decks)
All lands (4)
- Izzet Guildgate relevance 0.56 · 19.9% (32 of 161 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.48 · 23.6% (38 of 161 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.38 · 19.3% (31 of 161 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.36 · 27.3% (44 of 161 decks)
EDH data for String of Disappearances: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 161 real decks.