Wall of Junk
Played in 381 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
3.0% Simic
- Bant 6,120 · 48.7%
- Abzan 3,035 · 24.1%
- White 578 · 4.6%
- Dimir 487 · 3.9%
- Blue 475 · 3.8%
- Simic 381 · 3.0%
- Colorless 279 · 2.2%
- Other (25) 1,224 · 9.7%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (1)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 5.64 · 27.1% (356 of 1,314 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 4.46 · 80.8% (308 of 381 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 4.43 · 83.5% (318 of 381 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 4.15 · 82.2% (313 of 381 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 4.13 · 83.5% (318 of 381 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 3.97 · 70.1% (267 of 381 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 3.87 · 69.3% (264 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 3.71 · 65.6% (250 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 3.67 · 59.3% (226 of 381 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 3.67 · 70.9% (270 of 381 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 3.56 · 69.3% (264 of 381 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 3.39 · 57.5% (219 of 381 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 3.31 · 59.1% (225 of 381 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 3.31 · 57.5% (219 of 381 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 3.31 · 58.3% (222 of 381 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 3.24 · 78.2% (298 of 381 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 3.16 · 53.0% (202 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 3.01 · 64.0% (244 of 381 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.95 · 74.8% (285 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.95 · 50.1% (191 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.74 · 49.9% (190 of 381 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 2.73 · 44.9% (171 of 381 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.72 · 55.1% (210 of 381 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 2.66 · 55.1% (210 of 381 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.56 · 42.3% (161 of 381 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.49 · 60.9% (232 of 381 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 2.44 · 41.5% (158 of 381 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 2.43 · 40.4% (154 of 381 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 2.42 · 38.6% (147 of 381 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 2.36 · 40.9% (156 of 381 decks)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 2.30 · 37.5% (143 of 381 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 4.46 · 80.8% (308 of 381 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 4.15 · 82.2% (313 of 381 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 4.13 · 83.5% (318 of 381 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 3.97 · 70.1% (267 of 381 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 3.87 · 69.3% (264 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 3.71 · 65.6% (250 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 3.67 · 59.3% (226 of 381 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 3.67 · 70.9% (270 of 381 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 3.56 · 69.3% (264 of 381 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 3.39 · 57.5% (219 of 381 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 3.31 · 57.5% (219 of 381 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 3.31 · 58.3% (222 of 381 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 3.24 · 78.2% (298 of 381 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 3.16 · 53.0% (202 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 3.01 · 64.0% (244 of 381 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 2.95 · 74.8% (285 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 2.95 · 50.1% (191 of 381 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 2.74 · 49.9% (190 of 381 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 2.73 · 44.9% (171 of 381 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 2.72 · 55.1% (210 of 381 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 2.66 · 55.1% (210 of 381 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 2.49 · 60.9% (232 of 381 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 2.44 · 41.5% (158 of 381 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 2.43 · 40.4% (154 of 381 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 2.42 · 38.6% (147 of 381 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 2.36 · 40.9% (156 of 381 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 2.29 · 49.6% (189 of 381 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 2.02 · 58.5% (223 of 381 decks)
- Mistford River Turtle relevance 1.99 · 32.5% (124 of 381 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 1.96 · 58.0% (221 of 381 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 1.83 · 29.1% (111 of 381 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.61 · 33.6% (128 of 381 decks)
- Arboreal Grazer relevance 1.53 · 40.4% (154 of 381 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 1.38 · 48.0% (183 of 381 decks)
- Towering Viewpoint relevance 1.32 · 19.7% (75 of 381 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 2.30 · 37.5% (143 of 381 decks)
- Key to the City relevance 1.90 · 32.0% (122 of 381 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Assault Formation relevance 4.43 · 83.5% (318 of 381 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 3.31 · 59.1% (225 of 381 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 2.04 · 62.7% (239 of 381 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 1.94 · 55.1% (210 of 381 decks)
- Sword Coast Sailor relevance 1.52 · 25.5% (97 of 381 decks)
All instants (3)
- Tower Defense relevance 2.56 · 42.3% (161 of 381 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.85 · 31.2% (119 of 381 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 1.56 · 29.7% (113 of 381 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 2.20 · 39.9% (152 of 381 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 1.59 · 28.9% (110 of 381 decks)
- Traverse Eternity relevance 1.40 · 25.5% (97 of 381 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.36 · 36.7% (140 of 381 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Access Tunnel relevance 2.83 · 59.8% (228 of 381 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Junk: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 381 real decks.