Wall of Caltrops
Played in 94 Bant decks
230+41+1+4+1+2+1+
Color Identity Spread
24.5% Bant
Commanders
Most Relevant
Fortified Area 54.3% of decks
Fortified Area 54.3% of decks
Wall of Denial 87.2% of decks
Wall of Denial 87.2% of decks
Overgrown Battlement 79.8% of decks
Overgrown Battlement 79.8% of decks
Wall of Glare 58.5% of decks
Wall of Glare 58.5% of decks
Fog Bank 53.2% of decks
Fog Bank 53.2% of decks
Wall of Essence 41.5% of decks
Wall of Essence 41.5% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 0.72 · 1.6% (2 of 128 decks)
- Ragnar relevance 0.41 · 1.0% (1 of 96 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Fortified Area relevance 3.55 · 54.3% (51 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.55 · 87.2% (82 of 94 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.34 · 79.8% (75 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Glare relevance 2.23 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 2.04 · 53.2% (50 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 1.96 · 41.5% (39 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Hope relevance 1.93 · 37.2% (35 of 94 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.91 · 61.7% (58 of 94 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.78 · 53.2% (50 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.76 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.73 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (47 of 94 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.71 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.70 · 54.3% (51 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.70 · 40.4% (38 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.69 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.69 · 50.0% (47 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.67 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.64 · 46.8% (44 of 94 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.64 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Tears relevance 1.61 · 36.2% (34 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.55 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Vapor relevance 1.50 · 22.3% (21 of 94 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.7% (42 of 94 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.47 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.46 · 39.4% (37 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Nets relevance 1.46 · 30.9% (29 of 94 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.46 · 48.9% (46 of 94 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.44 · 46.8% (44 of 94 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.44 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
All creatures (41)
- Wall of Denial relevance 2.55 · 87.2% (82 of 94 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 2.34 · 79.8% (75 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Glare relevance 2.23 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Fog Bank relevance 2.04 · 53.2% (50 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 1.96 · 41.5% (39 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Hope relevance 1.93 · 37.2% (35 of 94 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.91 · 61.7% (58 of 94 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 1.78 · 53.2% (50 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 1.76 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.73 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Stolen Identity relevance 1.72 · 50.0% (47 of 94 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.71 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.70 · 54.3% (51 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Shards relevance 1.70 · 40.4% (38 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.69 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.69 · 50.0% (47 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 1.67 · 58.5% (55 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 1.64 · 46.8% (44 of 94 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.64 · 51.1% (48 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Tears relevance 1.61 · 36.2% (34 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 1.55 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Vapor relevance 1.50 · 22.3% (21 of 94 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.48 · 44.7% (42 of 94 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.46 · 39.4% (37 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Nets relevance 1.46 · 30.9% (29 of 94 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 1.46 · 48.9% (46 of 94 decks)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 1.44 · 46.8% (44 of 94 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 1.44 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
- Steel Wall relevance 1.42 · 33.0% (31 of 94 decks)
- Living Wall relevance 1.36 · 21.3% (20 of 94 decks)
- Guard Gomazoa relevance 1.34 · 28.7% (27 of 94 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.33 · 38.3% (36 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 1.32 · 36.2% (34 of 94 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.30 · 38.3% (36 of 94 decks)
- Glacial Wall relevance 1.28 · 28.7% (27 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Ice relevance 1.28 · 23.4% (22 of 94 decks)
- Wall of Kelp relevance 1.27 · 23.4% (22 of 94 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.24 · 34.0% (32 of 94 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.21 · 31.9% (30 of 94 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.21 · 39.4% (37 of 94 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 1.19 · 24.5% (23 of 94 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Rammas Echor, Ancient Shield relevance 1.28 · 36.2% (34 of 94 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Fortified Area relevance 3.55 · 54.3% (51 of 94 decks)
- High Alert relevance 1.47 · 47.9% (45 of 94 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 1.36 · 42.6% (40 of 94 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 1.22 · 36.2% (34 of 94 decks)
All instants (1)
- Tower Defense relevance 1.20 · 37.2% (35 of 94 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Fell the Mighty relevance 1.30 · 38.3% (36 of 94 decks)
- Slaughter the Strong relevance 1.22 · 38.3% (36 of 94 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Teyo, the Shieldmage relevance 1.17 · 25.5% (24 of 94 decks)
EDH data for Wall of Caltrops: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 94 real decks.



























