Colossal Might
Played in 158 Ink-Treader decks
130+9+8+28+1+2+2+
Color Identity Spread
9.7% Ink-Treader
Commanders
Most Relevant
Selesnya Charm 42.4% of decks
Selesnya Charm 42.4% of decks
Overprotect 24.7% of decks
Overprotect 24.7% of decks
Simic Charm 40.5% of decks
Simic Charm 40.5% of decks
Trace of Abundance 43.0% of decks
Trace of Abundance 43.0% of decks
Collision // Colossus 19.6% of decks
Collision // Colossus 19.6% of decks
Manamorphose 50.6% of decks
Manamorphose 50.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Human Torch relevance 1.49 · 3.9% (21 of 539 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Selesnya Charm relevance 1.56 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.19 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 1.18 · 40.5% (64 of 158 decks)
- Trace of Abundance relevance 1.17 · 43.0% (68 of 158 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 1.17 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Manamorphose relevance 1.15 · 50.6% (80 of 158 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 1.07 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Brokers Charm relevance 1.06 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 1.03 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.94 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.94 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- General Ferrous Rokiric relevance 0.94 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.92 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.91 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.91 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.90 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.90 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Fallaji Wayfarer relevance 0.88 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.88 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.87 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.87 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Azorius Charm relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.84 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.83 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot relevance 0.76 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.73 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.73 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.73 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
All creatures (9)
- General Ferrous Rokiric relevance 0.94 · 43.7% (69 of 158 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.92 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Faeburrow Elder relevance 0.90 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Fallaji Wayfarer relevance 0.88 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Lilah, Undefeated Slickshot relevance 0.76 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Bloom Tender relevance 0.73 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.73 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Kutzil, Malamet Exemplar relevance 0.72 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Feather, the Redeemed relevance 0.64 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Trace of Abundance relevance 1.17 · 43.0% (68 of 158 decks)
- Whirlwind of Thought relevance 0.90 · 46.8% (74 of 158 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.87 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Shield of the Oversoul relevance 0.84 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (23 of 158 decks)
- Annie Joins Up relevance 0.68 · 53.2% (84 of 158 decks)
- Mana Cannons relevance 0.66 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Jeskai Ascendancy relevance 0.61 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
All instants (28)
- Selesnya Charm relevance 1.56 · 42.4% (67 of 158 decks)
- Overprotect relevance 1.19 · 24.7% (39 of 158 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 1.18 · 40.5% (64 of 158 decks)
- Collision // Colossus relevance 1.17 · 19.6% (31 of 158 decks)
- Manamorphose relevance 1.15 · 50.6% (80 of 158 decks)
- Boros Charm relevance 1.07 · 57.0% (90 of 158 decks)
- Brokers Charm relevance 1.06 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 1.03 · 21.5% (34 of 158 decks)
- Naya Charm relevance 0.94 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.94 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
- Gaea's Gift relevance 0.91 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Invigorate relevance 0.91 · 17.1% (27 of 158 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.88 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.87 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Azorius Charm relevance 0.84 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.83 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.78 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Berserk relevance 0.78 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.73 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Vines of Vastwood relevance 0.71 · 12.7% (20 of 158 decks)
- Gruul Charm relevance 0.70 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.67 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Bant Charm relevance 0.66 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.65 · 47.5% (75 of 158 decks)
- Barkshell Blessing relevance 0.64 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
- Cabaretti Charm relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Psychotic Fury relevance 0.62 · 10.1% (16 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (1)
- Expressive Iteration relevance 0.73 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Legion Leadership // Legion Stronghold relevance 1.17 · 34.2% (54 of 158 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.91 · 25.9% (41 of 158 decks)
All lands (2)
- Pillar of the Paruns relevance 0.91 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.61 · 32.9% (52 of 158 decks)
EDH data for Colossal Might: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 158 real decks.






































