Ghastly Discovery
Played in 122 Azorius decks
530+10+2+2+19+17+
Color Identity Spread
23.1% Azorius
Commanders
Dorothea, Vengeful Victim // Dorothea's Retribution 2.4% of decks
Dorothea, Vengeful Victim // Dorothea's Retribution 2.4% of decks
Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 4.0% of decks
Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 4.0% of decks
Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody // Feywild Visitor 3.2% of decks
Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody // Feywild Visitor 3.2% of decks
Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 2.2% of decks
Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy 2.2% of decks
Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor 1.1% of decks
Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor 1.1% of decks
Most Relevant
Boon of the Wish-Giver 39.3% of decks
Boon of the Wish-Giver 39.3% of decks
Counsel of the Soratami 36.1% of decks
Counsel of the Soratami 36.1% of decks
Careful Consideration 35.2% of decks
Careful Consideration 35.2% of decks
Catalog 34.4% of decks
Catalog 34.4% of decks
Cephalid Broker 30.3% of decks
Cephalid Broker 30.3% of decks
Ancestral Reminiscence 34.4% of decks
Ancestral Reminiscence 34.4% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Dorothea, Vengeful Victim // Dorothea's Retribution relevance 0.95 · 2.4% (3 of 123 decks)
- Far Traveler // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.54 · 4.0% (1 of 25 decks)
- Ellyn Harbreeze, Busybody // Feywild Visitor relevance 0.51 · 3.2% (1 of 31 decks)
- Noble Heritage // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.46 · 2.2% (1 of 45 decks)
- Clara Oswald // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.37 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 2.43 · 39.3% (48 of 122 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 2.36 · 36.1% (44 of 122 decks)
- Careful Consideration relevance 2.31 · 35.2% (43 of 122 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.28 · 34.4% (42 of 122 decks)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.09 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 2.06 · 34.4% (42 of 122 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.03 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 2.02 · 32.0% (39 of 122 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.00 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.98 · 32.8% (40 of 122 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.98 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.97 · 31.1% (38 of 122 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.94 · 32.8% (40 of 122 decks)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 1.93 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Glimmerburst relevance 1.93 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.93 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Future Flight relevance 1.92 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 1.92 · 31.1% (38 of 122 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 1.92 · 32.0% (39 of 122 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 1.91 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.87 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 1.86 · 45.9% (56 of 122 decks)
- Glacial Grasp relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 1.84 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.84 · 37.7% (46 of 122 decks)
- Geyser Leaper relevance 1.84 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.83 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
All creatures (10)
- Cephalid Broker relevance 2.09 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Enclave Cryptologist relevance 2.02 · 32.0% (39 of 122 decks)
- Galvanic Giant // Storm Reading relevance 2.00 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- April, Reporter of the Weird relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Geyser Leaper relevance 1.84 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Geology Enthusiast relevance 1.81 · 27.9% (34 of 122 decks)
- Glimmer Seeker relevance 1.79 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 1.77 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Arcane Investigator relevance 1.76 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
- Captain of Umbar relevance 1.75 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Geth's Grimoire relevance 1.93 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Futurist Forge relevance 1.92 · 32.0% (39 of 122 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Future Flight relevance 1.92 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Compulsion relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
All instants (19)
- Careful Consideration relevance 2.31 · 35.2% (43 of 122 decks)
- Catalog relevance 2.28 · 34.4% (42 of 122 decks)
- Grip of Amnesia relevance 2.03 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Artificer's Epiphany relevance 1.98 · 32.8% (40 of 122 decks)
- Deny Entry relevance 1.97 · 31.1% (38 of 122 decks)
- Glimmerburst relevance 1.93 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Case the Joint relevance 1.93 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Flow of Knowledge relevance 1.91 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Glacial Grasp relevance 1.86 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Bandage relevance 1.82 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Chemister's Insight relevance 1.82 · 30.3% (37 of 122 decks)
- Delightful Discovery relevance 1.82 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Glimmer of Genius relevance 1.78 · 31.1% (38 of 122 decks)
- Bewildering Blizzard relevance 1.78 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
- Draconic Lore relevance 1.77 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
- Call to Heel relevance 1.77 · 26.2% (32 of 122 decks)
- Hieroglyphic Illumination relevance 1.77 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Geistwave relevance 1.76 · 33.6% (41 of 122 decks)
- Homesickness relevance 1.75 · 25.4% (31 of 122 decks)
All sorceries (17)
- Boon of the Wish-Giver relevance 2.43 · 39.3% (48 of 122 decks)
- Counsel of the Soratami relevance 2.36 · 36.1% (44 of 122 decks)
- Ancestral Reminiscence relevance 2.06 · 34.4% (42 of 122 decks)
- Brilliant Plan relevance 1.98 · 28.7% (35 of 122 decks)
- Concentrate relevance 1.94 · 32.8% (40 of 122 decks)
- Amass the Components relevance 1.92 · 31.1% (38 of 122 decks)
- Cloak of Feathers relevance 1.87 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Dream Cache relevance 1.87 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 1.86 · 45.9% (56 of 122 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 1.84 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 1.84 · 37.7% (46 of 122 decks)
- Cosmic Epiphany relevance 1.83 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Drag Under relevance 1.83 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
- Compulsive Research relevance 1.80 · 37.7% (46 of 122 decks)
- Divination relevance 1.78 · 36.1% (44 of 122 decks)
- Donatello's Technique relevance 1.74 · 29.5% (36 of 122 decks)
- Breakthrough relevance 1.74 · 27.0% (33 of 122 decks)
EDH data for Ghastly Discovery: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 122 real decks.
















































