Conduit of Storms // Conduit of Emrakul
Played in 68 Izzet decks
230+19+6+4+12+9+
Color Identity Spread
3.6% Izzet
Commanders
Most Relevant
Extraordinary Journey 14.7% of decks
Extraordinary Journey 14.7% of decks
Ulamog's Crusher 16.2% of decks
Ulamog's Crusher 16.2% of decks
Cancel 23.5% of decks
Cancel 23.5% of decks
Kozilek's Unsealing 14.7% of decks
Kozilek's Unsealing 14.7% of decks
Scatter Ray 13.2% of decks
Scatter Ray 13.2% of decks
Aethersnipe 13.2% of decks
Aethersnipe 13.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (2)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 1.13 · 6.3% (2 of 32 decks)
- Alora, Merry Thief // Guild Artisan relevance 0.58 · 2.3% (1 of 44 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.98 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.96 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Cancel relevance 0.93 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Scatter Ray relevance 0.91 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.89 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Potioner's Trove relevance 0.86 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.85 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.81 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Amy Pond relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Sibylline Soothsayer relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- The Parting of the Ways relevance 0.79 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.79 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.79 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.78 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Skittering Invasion relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.76 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 0.75 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.72 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Conduct Electricity relevance 0.71 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Maverick Thopterist relevance 0.70 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Seize the Storm relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Fury Charm relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Shivan Sand-Mage relevance 0.70 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Iraxxa, Empress of Mars relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
All creatures (19)
- Ulamog's Crusher relevance 0.96 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Aethersnipe relevance 0.89 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Amy Pond relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Sibylline Soothsayer relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Sandstone Oracle relevance 0.79 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Timebender relevance 0.79 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.76 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Time Beetle relevance 0.72 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Maverick Thopterist relevance 0.70 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Shivan Sand-Mage relevance 0.70 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Iraxxa, Empress of Mars relevance 0.69 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- The Tenth Doctor relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Stadium Tidalmage relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- The Ninth Doctor relevance 0.64 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Rift Elemental relevance 0.63 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Jhoira's Timebug relevance 0.62 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Meteor Golem relevance 0.60 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Hydro-Channeler relevance 0.55 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Potioner's Trove relevance 0.86 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Rotating Fireplace relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.67 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Letter of Acceptance relevance 0.60 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.55 · 19.1% (13 of 68 decks)
- Fire Diamond relevance 0.52 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Extraordinary Journey relevance 0.98 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Kozilek's Unsealing relevance 0.91 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- The Parting of the Ways relevance 0.79 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Confiscate relevance 0.78 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
All instants (12)
- Cancel relevance 0.93 · 23.5% (16 of 68 decks)
- Scatter Ray relevance 0.91 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.85 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Opportunity relevance 0.79 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Conduct Electricity relevance 0.71 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Fury Charm relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Surge of Brilliance relevance 0.66 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Syncopate relevance 0.64 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.62 · 17.6% (12 of 68 decks)
- Eject relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Thunder Magic relevance 0.56 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.55 · 16.2% (11 of 68 decks)
All sorceries (9)
- Interpret the Signs relevance 0.81 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Skittering Invasion relevance 0.76 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- All of History, All at Once relevance 0.75 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Seize the Storm relevance 0.70 · 14.7% (10 of 68 decks)
- Part the Waterveil relevance 0.67 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Plea for Power relevance 0.65 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Wibbly-wobbly, Timey-wimey relevance 0.65 · 13.2% (9 of 68 decks)
- Overflowing Insight relevance 0.58 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
- Procrastinate relevance 0.57 · 11.8% (8 of 68 decks)
EDH data for Conduit of Storms // Conduit of Emrakul: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 68 real decks.


















































