Telekinesis
Played in 44 Azorius decks
130+6+6+11+11+10+1+4+1+
Color Identity Spread
24.6% Azorius
Commanders
Most Relevant
Divine Intervention 52.3% of decks
Divine Intervention 52.3% of decks
Sunder 47.7% of decks
Sunder 47.7% of decks
Teferi, Timeless Voyager 45.5% of decks
Teferi, Timeless Voyager 45.5% of decks
Acid Rain 45.5% of decks
Acid Rain 45.5% of decks
Drain Power 43.2% of decks
Drain Power 43.2% of decks
Land Equilibrium 43.2% of decks
Land Equilibrium 43.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- War Machine, James Rhodes relevance 0.85 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Divine Intervention relevance 3.42 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Sunder relevance 2.97 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 2.92 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Acid Rain relevance 2.90 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 2.89 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Land Equilibrium relevance 2.87 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- In the Eye of Chaos relevance 2.79 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 2.75 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Arena of the Ancients relevance 2.74 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Mana Short relevance 2.72 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 2.70 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- The Celestus relevance 2.68 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- The Eighth Doctor relevance 2.68 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 2.65 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Replenish relevance 2.65 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 2.64 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 2.60 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 2.60 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 2.60 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 2.59 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Treachery relevance 2.59 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Gush relevance 2.59 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 2.56 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Sway of the Stars relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Diminishing Returns relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.53 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Last Word relevance 2.51 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
All creatures (6)
- The Eighth Doctor relevance 2.68 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Tidal Force relevance 2.60 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Thada Adel, Acquisitor relevance 2.60 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Tandem Lookout relevance 2.59 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Sun Quan, Lord of Wu relevance 2.53 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- True-Name Nemesis relevance 2.48 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
All artifacts (6)
- Arena of the Ancients relevance 2.74 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- The Dominion Bracelet relevance 2.70 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- The Celestus relevance 2.68 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Ankh of Mishra relevance 2.51 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- The Chain Veil relevance 2.48 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Tsabo's Web relevance 2.47 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
All enchantments (11)
- Divine Intervention relevance 3.42 · 52.3% (23 of 44 decks)
- Land Equilibrium relevance 2.87 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- In the Eye of Chaos relevance 2.79 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Treachery relevance 2.59 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Temporary Lockdown relevance 2.56 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Axis of Mortality relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Words of Wind relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- The Phasing of Zhalfir relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Teferi's Moat relevance 2.49 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Tale of Tinúviel relevance 2.47 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Thought Lash relevance 2.46 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
All instants (11)
- Sunder relevance 2.97 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Mana Short relevance 2.72 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Discontinuity relevance 2.65 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Gather Specimens relevance 2.64 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Gush relevance 2.59 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Last Word relevance 2.51 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Pollen Lullaby relevance 2.50 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Take into Custody relevance 2.46 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Test of Talents relevance 2.46 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Reset relevance 2.45 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Thoughtweft Gambit relevance 2.43 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Acid Rain relevance 2.90 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
- Drain Power relevance 2.89 · 43.2% (19 of 44 decks)
- Temporal Fissure relevance 2.75 · 40.9% (18 of 44 decks)
- Replenish relevance 2.65 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- False Defeat relevance 2.60 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Sway of the Stars relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Diminishing Returns relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 2.50 · 56.8% (25 of 44 decks)
- Temporal Trespass relevance 2.46 · 47.7% (21 of 44 decks)
- Reconstruction relevance 2.44 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Teferi, Timeless Voyager relevance 2.92 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Bazaar of Baghdad relevance 2.64 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Eye of Ugin relevance 2.55 · 38.6% (17 of 44 decks)
- Rishadan Port relevance 2.49 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
- Tower of the Magistrate relevance 2.48 · 36.4% (16 of 44 decks)
All lands (1)
- Thawing Glaciers relevance 2.93 · 45.5% (20 of 44 decks)
EDH data for Telekinesis: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 44 real decks.














































