Plague Wind
Played in 5,370 Golgari decks
2130+15+2+8+24+1+
Color Identity Spread
38.6% Golgari
Commanders
Witherbloom, the Balancer 19.6% of decks
Witherbloom, the Balancer 19.6% of decks
Belbe, Corrupted Observer 8.8% of decks
Belbe, Corrupted Observer 8.8% of decks
Glissa Sunslayer 6.1% of decks
Glissa Sunslayer 6.1% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron 16.7% of decks
Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron 16.7% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 9.4% of decks
Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools 9.4% of decks
Tyvar the Bellicose 1.8% of decks
Tyvar the Bellicose 1.8% of decks
Most Relevant
In Garruk's Wake 77.8% of decks
In Garruk's Wake 77.8% of decks
Army of the Damned 55.2% of decks
Army of the Damned 55.2% of decks
Awaken the Woods 60.8% of decks
Awaken the Woods 60.8% of decks
Sprout Swarm 54.7% of decks
Sprout Swarm 54.7% of decks
Ezuri's Predation 53.3% of decks
Ezuri's Predation 53.3% of decks
Animist's Awakening 44.9% of decks
Animist's Awakening 44.9% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (21)
- Witherbloom, the Balancer relevance 3.97 · 19.6% (4,240 of 21,637 decks)
- Belbe, Corrupted Observer relevance 1.83 · 8.8% (211 of 2,400 decks)
- Glissa Sunslayer relevance 1.23 · 6.1% (74 of 1,222 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.49 · 16.7% (2 of 12 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.49 · 9.4% (3 of 32 decks)
- Tyvar the Bellicose relevance 0.49 · 1.8% (34 of 1,862 decks)
- Beledros Witherbloom relevance 0.31 · 1.1% (27 of 2,485 decks)
- Nath of the Gilt-Leaf relevance 0.30 · 1.5% (11 of 728 decks)
- Vhati il-Dal relevance 0.29 · 2.3% (5 of 217 decks)
- Sisters of Stone Death relevance 0.25 · 1.9% (5 of 263 decks)
- Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools // Slurrk, All-Ingesting relevance 0.21 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Atlas, Sizable Stooge relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (1 of 17 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Sengir, the Dark Baron relevance 0.19 · 5.6% (1 of 18 decks)
- Nemata, Primeval Warden relevance 0.18 · 1.0% (7 of 696 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Miara, Thorn of the Glade relevance 0.15 · 3.8% (1 of 26 decks)
- Pippin, Warden of Isengard relevance 0.15 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Scion of Halaster relevance 0.14 · 1.0% (4 of 398 decks)
- Old Man Willow relevance 0.11 · 1.1% (2 of 176 decks)
- Erinis, Gloom Stalker // Agent of the Shadow Thieves relevance 0.09 · 1.7% (1 of 58 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.08 · 1.4% (1 of 69 decks)
- Rhys the Exiled relevance 0.06 · 1.0% (1 of 97 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 2.18 · 77.8% (4,179 of 5,370 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 1.79 · 55.2% (2,962 of 5,370 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.75 · 60.8% (3,267 of 5,370 decks)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 1.64 · 54.7% (2,940 of 5,370 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.60 · 53.3% (2,862 of 5,370 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.59 · 44.9% (2,410 of 5,370 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.56 · 71.5% (3,838 of 5,370 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.54 · 57.6% (3,092 of 5,370 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.53 · 44.5% (2,389 of 5,370 decks)
- Stinging Study relevance 1.43 · 41.1% (2,209 of 5,370 decks)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 1.40 · 48.8% (2,620 of 5,370 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 1.39 · 37.3% (2,001 of 5,370 decks)
- Diabolic Revelation relevance 1.30 · 34.5% (1,852 of 5,370 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.25 · 39.6% (2,127 of 5,370 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 1.25 · 33.5% (1,797 of 5,370 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 1.25 · 51.1% (2,742 of 5,370 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.22 · 30.6% (1,643 of 5,370 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 1.20 · 60.4% (3,243 of 5,370 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 1.20 · 42.0% (2,255 of 5,370 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.14 · 71.2% (3,823 of 5,370 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 1.12 · 39.9% (2,142 of 5,370 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 1.09 · 49.0% (2,630 of 5,370 decks)
- Chatterfang, Squirrel General relevance 1.03 · 52.6% (2,827 of 5,370 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 1.03 · 27.5% (1,478 of 5,370 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (1,522 of 5,370 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 1.02 · 32.2% (1,727 of 5,370 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 1.02 · 45.2% (2,428 of 5,370 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.99 · 29.3% (1,576 of 5,370 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.98 · 57.5% (3,087 of 5,370 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.96 · 41.2% (2,214 of 5,370 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Sedgemoor Witch relevance 1.40 · 48.8% (2,620 of 5,370 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 1.25 · 39.6% (2,127 of 5,370 decks)
- Enduring Vitality relevance 1.25 · 51.1% (2,742 of 5,370 decks)
- Chatterfang, Squirrel General relevance 1.03 · 52.6% (2,827 of 5,370 decks)
- Badgermole Cub relevance 1.02 · 32.2% (1,727 of 5,370 decks)
- Fyndhorn Elves relevance 0.98 · 57.5% (3,087 of 5,370 decks)
- Dryad Arbor relevance 0.96 · 40.4% (2,171 of 5,370 decks)
- Studious First-Year // Rampant Growth relevance 0.95 · 29.2% (1,568 of 5,370 decks)
- Birds of Paradise relevance 0.93 · 60.4% (3,246 of 5,370 decks)
- Scute Swarm relevance 0.93 · 47.1% (2,528 of 5,370 decks)
- Stensian Sanguinist // Exsanguinate relevance 0.91 · 33.7% (1,810 of 5,370 decks)
- Delighted Halfling relevance 0.90 · 38.3% (2,056 of 5,370 decks)
- Tendershoot Dryad relevance 0.89 · 39.0% (2,096 of 5,370 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.88 · 44.8% (2,405 of 5,370 decks)
- Elves of Deep Shadow relevance 0.86 · 51.1% (2,745 of 5,370 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.95 · 35.0% (1,879 of 5,370 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.84 · 28.2% (1,515 of 5,370 decks)
All instants (8)
- Sprout Swarm relevance 1.64 · 54.7% (2,940 of 5,370 decks)
- Stinging Study relevance 1.43 · 41.1% (2,209 of 5,370 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 1.09 · 49.0% (2,630 of 5,370 decks)
- Szat's Will relevance 1.03 · 27.5% (1,478 of 5,370 decks)
- Arachnogenesis relevance 1.02 · 45.2% (2,428 of 5,370 decks)
- Tyvar's Stand relevance 0.87 · 29.9% (1,605 of 5,370 decks)
- Vitalizing Wind relevance 0.82 · 16.3% (875 of 5,370 decks)
- Scour from Existence relevance 0.81 · 16.5% (888 of 5,370 decks)
All sorceries (24)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 2.18 · 77.8% (4,179 of 5,370 decks)
- Army of the Damned relevance 1.79 · 55.2% (2,962 of 5,370 decks)
- Awaken the Woods relevance 1.75 · 60.8% (3,267 of 5,370 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 1.60 · 53.3% (2,862 of 5,370 decks)
- Animist's Awakening relevance 1.59 · 44.9% (2,410 of 5,370 decks)
- Exsanguinate relevance 1.56 · 71.5% (3,838 of 5,370 decks)
- Torment of Hailfire relevance 1.54 · 57.6% (3,092 of 5,370 decks)
- Damnable Pact relevance 1.53 · 44.5% (2,389 of 5,370 decks)
- Collective Unconscious relevance 1.39 · 37.3% (2,001 of 5,370 decks)
- Diabolic Revelation relevance 1.30 · 34.5% (1,852 of 5,370 decks)
- Biorhythm relevance 1.25 · 33.5% (1,797 of 5,370 decks)
- Gelatinous Genesis relevance 1.22 · 30.6% (1,643 of 5,370 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 1.20 · 60.4% (3,243 of 5,370 decks)
- Rise of the Dark Realms relevance 1.20 · 42.0% (2,255 of 5,370 decks)
- Pest Infestation relevance 1.14 · 71.2% (3,823 of 5,370 decks)
- For the Common Good relevance 1.12 · 39.9% (2,142 of 5,370 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 1.03 · 28.3% (1,522 of 5,370 decks)
- Preposterous Proportions relevance 0.99 · 29.3% (1,576 of 5,370 decks)
- Finale of Devastation relevance 0.96 · 41.2% (2,214 of 5,370 decks)
- Saproling Symbiosis relevance 0.96 · 26.3% (1,414 of 5,370 decks)
- Lab Rats relevance 0.94 · 23.1% (1,238 of 5,370 decks)
- Praetor's Counsel relevance 0.93 · 20.0% (1,073 of 5,370 decks)
- Beseech the Queen relevance 0.85 · 23.6% (1,268 of 5,370 decks)
- Dregs of Sorrow relevance 0.82 · 17.2% (923 of 5,370 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Khalni Garden relevance 0.98 · 30.1% (1,616 of 5,370 decks)
EDH data for Plague Wind: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 5,370 real decks.

























































