Hoarding Broodlord
Played in 4,483 Grixis decks
2430+12+2+4+15+11+1+5+
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin 9.1% of decks
Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin 9.1% of decks
Inalla, Archmage Ritualist 9.2% of decks
Inalla, Archmage Ritualist 9.2% of decks
The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 10.2% of decks
The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough 10.2% of decks
Evelyn, the Covetous 4.4% of decks
Evelyn, the Covetous 4.4% of decks
Sauron, Lord of the Rings 3.3% of decks
Sauron, Lord of the Rings 3.3% of decks
Sedris, the Traitor King 4.0% of decks
Sedris, the Traitor King 4.0% of decks
Most Relevant
Saw in Half 72.0% of decks
Saw in Half 72.0% of decks
Burnt Offering 54.3% of decks
Burnt Offering 54.3% of decks
Persist 44.7% of decks
Persist 44.7% of decks
Necromancy 42.9% of decks
Necromancy 42.9% of decks
Lively Dirge 33.6% of decks
Lively Dirge 33.6% of decks
Simian Spirit Guide 50.7% of decks
Simian Spirit Guide 50.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (24)
- Kefka, Court Mage // Kefka, Ruler of Ruin relevance 2.80 · 9.1% (1,975 of 21,691 decks)
- Inalla, Archmage Ritualist relevance 2.50 · 9.2% (834 of 9,031 decks)
- The Twelfth Doctor // Vislor Turlough relevance 1.37 · 10.2% (33 of 322 decks)
- Evelyn, the Covetous relevance 1.16 · 4.4% (92 of 2,108 decks)
- Sauron, Lord of the Rings relevance 1.06 · 3.3% (123 of 3,685 decks)
- Sedris, the Traitor King relevance 0.94 · 4.0% (45 of 1,124 decks)
- The Madcap Jester relevance 0.93 · 3.4% (62 of 1,815 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.70 · 5.6% (10 of 180 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Dargo, the Shipwrecker relevance 0.68 · 4.2% (14 of 332 decks)
- Marchesa, Dealer of Death relevance 0.66 · 1.9% (69 of 3,623 decks)
- Cormela, Glamour Thief relevance 0.64 · 2.1% (50 of 2,412 decks)
- Kess, Dissident Mage relevance 0.59 · 1.6% (76 of 4,779 decks)
- Nathan Drake, Treasure Hunter relevance 0.54 · 1.6% (46 of 2,796 decks)
- Obeka, Brute Chronologist relevance 0.50 · 1.3% (66 of 5,014 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Sakashima of a Thousand Faces relevance 0.49 · 1.9% (23 of 1,215 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (3 of 38 decks)
- Edward Kenway relevance 0.46 · 1.1% (79 of 7,046 decks)
- Don Andres, the Renegade relevance 0.40 · 1.2% (40 of 3,403 decks)
- Crosis, the Purger relevance 0.36 · 1.8% (11 of 625 decks)
- Francisco, Fowl Marauder // Kraum, Ludevic's Opus relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (3 of 89 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Tevesh Szat, Doom of Fools relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (2 of 58 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (2 of 59 decks)
- Kraum, Ludevic's Opus // Armix, Filigree Thrasher relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Krark, the Thumbless relevance 0.16 · 1.0% (4 of 399 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Saw in Half relevance 2.04 · 72.0% (3,228 of 4,483 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.01 · 54.3% (2,433 of 4,483 decks)
- Persist relevance 1.56 · 44.7% (2,004 of 4,483 decks)
- Necromancy relevance 1.43 · 42.9% (1,924 of 4,483 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 1.34 · 33.6% (1,507 of 4,483 decks)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 1.29 · 50.7% (2,273 of 4,483 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.29 · 47.0% (2,106 of 4,483 decks)
- Entomb relevance 1.28 · 44.8% (2,007 of 4,483 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 1.25 · 26.8% (1,200 of 4,483 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 1.20 · 51.3% (2,301 of 4,483 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 1.20 · 43.9% (1,969 of 4,483 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 1.17 · 37.1% (1,664 of 4,483 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 1.15 · 24.4% (1,094 of 4,483 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 1.15 · 46.6% (2,090 of 4,483 decks)
- Generator Servant relevance 1.10 · 24.4% (1,093 of 4,483 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 1.04 · 28.4% (1,271 of 4,483 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 1.03 · 24.0% (1,077 of 4,483 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.98 · 25.5% (1,143 of 4,483 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.97 · 43.9% (1,966 of 4,483 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.92 · 20.4% (916 of 4,483 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.92 · 19.1% (856 of 4,483 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.91 · 22.4% (1,002 of 4,483 decks)
- Shallow Grave relevance 0.89 · 17.2% (773 of 4,483 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.88 · 66.7% (2,990 of 4,483 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.86 · 36.6% (1,643 of 4,483 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 0.86 · 16.4% (733 of 4,483 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.84 · 17.7% (795 of 4,483 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.84 · 37.1% (1,665 of 4,483 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.83 · 39.6% (1,774 of 4,483 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.82 · 19.1% (856 of 4,483 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Simian Spirit Guide relevance 1.29 · 50.7% (2,273 of 4,483 decks)
- Blood Pet relevance 1.25 · 26.8% (1,200 of 4,483 decks)
- Generator Servant relevance 1.10 · 24.4% (1,093 of 4,483 decks)
- Scholar of the Ages relevance 0.92 · 19.1% (856 of 4,483 decks)
- Dualcaster Mage relevance 0.86 · 36.6% (1,643 of 4,483 decks)
- Reckless Barbarian relevance 0.86 · 16.4% (733 of 4,483 decks)
- Malevolent Hermit // Benevolent Geist relevance 0.82 · 19.1% (856 of 4,483 decks)
- Goldhound relevance 0.82 · 16.0% (718 of 4,483 decks)
- Spellseeker relevance 0.82 · 23.3% (1,044 of 4,483 decks)
- Thassa's Oracle relevance 0.81 · 32.5% (1,457 of 4,483 decks)
- Volatile Stormdrake relevance 0.78 · 17.7% (795 of 4,483 decks)
- Skirk Prospector relevance 0.76 · 15.2% (682 of 4,483 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 1.15 · 46.6% (2,090 of 4,483 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.97 · 43.9% (1,966 of 4,483 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Necromancy relevance 1.43 · 42.9% (1,924 of 4,483 decks)
- Animate Dead relevance 1.20 · 51.3% (2,301 of 4,483 decks)
- Underworld Breach relevance 0.83 · 39.6% (1,774 of 4,483 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.81 · 43.9% (1,967 of 4,483 decks)
All instants (15)
- Saw in Half relevance 2.04 · 72.0% (3,228 of 4,483 decks)
- Burnt Offering relevance 2.01 · 54.3% (2,433 of 4,483 decks)
- Essence Flux relevance 1.29 · 47.0% (2,106 of 4,483 decks)
- Entomb relevance 1.28 · 44.8% (2,007 of 4,483 decks)
- Sacrifice relevance 1.15 · 24.4% (1,094 of 4,483 decks)
- Lim-Dûl's Vault relevance 1.04 · 28.4% (1,271 of 4,483 decks)
- Shallow Grave relevance 0.89 · 17.2% (773 of 4,483 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.84 · 37.1% (1,665 of 4,483 decks)
- Ghostly Flicker relevance 0.81 · 29.9% (1,340 of 4,483 decks)
- Brain Freeze relevance 0.81 · 32.1% (1,440 of 4,483 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.80 · 32.9% (1,473 of 4,483 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.80 · 21.5% (963 of 4,483 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.80 · 29.1% (1,306 of 4,483 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.78 · 28.0% (1,255 of 4,483 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.78 · 31.2% (1,397 of 4,483 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Persist relevance 1.56 · 44.7% (2,004 of 4,483 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 1.34 · 33.6% (1,507 of 4,483 decks)
- Rite of Flame relevance 1.20 · 43.9% (1,969 of 4,483 decks)
- Buried Alive relevance 1.17 · 37.1% (1,664 of 4,483 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 1.03 · 24.0% (1,077 of 4,483 decks)
- Strike It Rich relevance 0.98 · 25.5% (1,143 of 4,483 decks)
- Final Parting relevance 0.92 · 20.4% (916 of 4,483 decks)
- Electroduplicate relevance 0.91 · 22.4% (1,002 of 4,483 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.88 · 66.7% (2,990 of 4,483 decks)
- Finale of Promise relevance 0.84 · 17.7% (795 of 4,483 decks)
- Demonic Counsel relevance 0.78 · 26.1% (1,171 of 4,483 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 1.02 · 32.1% (1,438 of 4,483 decks)
All lands (5)
- Peat Bog relevance 0.87 · 16.2% (726 of 4,483 decks)
- Gemstone Mine relevance 0.84 · 20.4% (916 of 4,483 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.79 · 40.7% (1,823 of 4,483 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.77 · 36.1% (1,618 of 4,483 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.77 · 33.3% (1,491 of 4,483 decks)
EDH data for Hoarding Broodlord: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 4,483 real decks.



































































