Cephalid Broker
Played in 194 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
10.4% Dimir
Commanders
7
Commanders
7Showing 1-7 of 7
Page size
All commanders (7)
- Oskar, Rubbish Reclaimer relevance 2.20 · 2.3% (35 of 1,538 decks)
- Runo Stromkirk // Krothuss, Lord of the Deep relevance 2.11 · 1.6% (46 of 2,911 decks)
- Nebuchadnezzar relevance 0.70 · 1.2% (3 of 242 decks)
- Doc Ock, Evil Inventor relevance 0.53 · 1.1% (2 of 181 decks)
- Kotose, the Silent Spider relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- Truss, Chief Engineer relevance 0.38 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
- X relevance 0.33 · 1.0% (1 of 98 decks)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.13 · 29.9% (58 of 194 decks)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.05 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.04 · 18.6% (36 of 194 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.02 · 22.7% (44 of 194 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.01 · 24.7% (48 of 194 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.00 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (48 of 194 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.98 · 25.3% (49 of 194 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (37 of 194 decks)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.92 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.92 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (32 of 194 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.82 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (35 of 194 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.79 · 13.4% (26 of 194 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.77 · 17.5% (34 of 194 decks)
- Dreamscape Artist relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (31 of 194 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Magus of the Bazaar relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (24 of 194 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.75 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (44 of 194 decks)
- Faith of the Devoted relevance 0.74 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Reckless Scholar relevance 0.73 · 10.8% (21 of 194 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.73 · 16.5% (32 of 194 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (27 of 194 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.71 · 21.1% (41 of 194 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (42 of 194 decks)
Creatures
40
Creatures
40 Showing 1-10 of 40
Page size
All creatures (40)
- Serpent of Yawning Depths relevance 1.05 · 25.8% (50 of 194 decks)
- Cephalid Inkmage relevance 1.04 · 18.6% (36 of 194 decks)
- Merfolk Looter relevance 1.02 · 22.7% (44 of 194 decks)
- Summon: Leviathan relevance 1.01 · 24.7% (48 of 194 decks)
- Grappling Kraken relevance 1.00 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Spawning Kraken relevance 0.99 · 24.7% (48 of 194 decks)
- Obsessive Stitcher relevance 0.98 · 25.3% (49 of 194 decks)
- Sea-Dasher Octopus relevance 0.96 · 19.1% (37 of 194 decks)
- Stormsurge Kraken relevance 0.92 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Elder Deep-Fiend relevance 0.83 · 16.5% (32 of 194 decks)
- Slinn Voda, the Rising Deep relevance 0.82 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Deep-Sea Kraken relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (35 of 194 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.79 · 13.4% (26 of 194 decks)
- Bonded Fetch relevance 0.79 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Junk Winder relevance 0.77 · 17.5% (34 of 194 decks)
- Dreamscape Artist relevance 0.77 · 16.0% (31 of 194 decks)
- Stormtide Leviathan relevance 0.76 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Scourge of Fleets relevance 0.76 · 20.1% (39 of 194 decks)
- Magus of the Bazaar relevance 0.76 · 12.4% (24 of 194 decks)
- Mesmerizing Benthid relevance 0.75 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Gyruda, Doom of Depths relevance 0.74 · 22.7% (44 of 194 decks)
- Reckless Scholar relevance 0.73 · 10.8% (21 of 194 decks)
- Tidal Terror relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (27 of 194 decks)
- Starwinder relevance 0.71 · 21.1% (41 of 194 decks)
- Vohar, Vodalian Desecrator relevance 0.70 · 21.6% (42 of 194 decks)
- Tromokratis relevance 0.70 · 17.0% (33 of 194 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (30 of 194 decks)
- Thought Courier relevance 0.68 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Marvo, Deep Operative relevance 0.66 · 14.9% (29 of 194 decks)
- Brinelin, the Moon Kraken relevance 0.65 · 17.0% (33 of 194 decks)
- Archfiend of Ifnir relevance 0.64 · 15.5% (30 of 194 decks)
- Wrexial, the Risen Deep relevance 0.63 · 21.1% (41 of 194 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.62 · 10.8% (21 of 194 decks)
- Tolarian Kraken relevance 0.59 · 9.8% (19 of 194 decks)
- River Kelpie relevance 0.57 · 11.9% (23 of 194 decks)
- Cephalid Facetaker relevance 0.57 · 12.4% (24 of 194 decks)
- The Raven Man relevance 0.57 · 9.8% (19 of 194 decks)
- Purple Pentapus relevance 0.56 · 8.8% (17 of 194 decks)
- Skirge Familiar relevance 0.56 · 11.3% (22 of 194 decks)
- Shield Broker relevance 0.55 · 9.8% (19 of 194 decks)
Enchantments
5
Enchantments
5 Showing 1-5 of 5
Page size
All enchantments (5)
- Quest for Ula's Temple relevance 0.92 · 19.6% (38 of 194 decks)
- Drake Haven relevance 0.77 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Faith of the Devoted relevance 0.74 · 12.9% (25 of 194 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.73 · 16.5% (32 of 194 decks)
- Feast of Sanity relevance 0.57 · 10.3% (20 of 194 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 
All instants (2)
- Otherworldly Gaze relevance 0.64 · 22.2% (43 of 194 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.59 · 35.6% (69 of 194 decks)
Sorceries
2
Sorceries
2 
All sorceries (2)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.13 · 29.9% (58 of 194 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.56 · 14.4% (28 of 194 decks)
Utility Lands
1
Utility Lands
1 Showing 1-1 of 1
Page size
All utility lands (1)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.70 · 23.7% (46 of 194 decks)
EDH data for Cephalid Broker: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 194 real decks.