Autochthon Wurm

Played in 1,064 decks

Autochthon Wurm
$2.95 €1.06

Change per day

Commanders

23

Showing 1-10 of 23

Page size
All commanders (23)
  1. Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 2.49 · 2.3% (33 of 1,446 decks)
  2. Atla Palani, Nest Tender relevance 2.40 · 1.6% (190 of 11,604 decks)
  3. Hazezon, Shaper of Sand relevance 2.39 · 2.3% (99 of 4,229 decks)
  4. Mayael the Anima relevance 1.99 · 2.3% (46 of 1,989 decks)
  5. Tolsimir Wolfblood relevance 1.54 · 5.4% (9 of 168 decks)
  6. Chorus of the Conclave relevance 1.27 · 6.7% (5 of 75 decks)
  7. Trostani Discordant relevance 1.09 · 3.8% (5 of 130 decks)
  8. Arcades Sabboth relevance 0.99 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
  9. Yannik, Scavenging Sentinel relevance 0.85 · 9.5% (2 of 21 decks)
  10. Ravos, Soultender // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.83 · 1.7% (3 of 172 decks)
  11. Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Flaming Fist relevance 0.61 · 16.7% (1 of 6 decks)
  12. Katerina of Myra's Marvels // Hardy of Myra's Marvels relevance 0.56 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
  13. Ardenn, Intrepid Archaeologist // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.47 · 2.6% (1 of 38 decks)
  14. Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Akroma, Vision of Ixidor relevance 0.46 · 1.3% (2 of 152 decks)
  15. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Ravos, Soultender relevance 0.46 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
  16. Jaheira, Friend of the Forest // Noble Heritage relevance 0.46 · 5.0% (1 of 20 decks)
  17. Ravos, Soultender // Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper relevance 0.42 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
  18. Daughter of Autumn relevance 0.35 · 2.1% (1 of 48 decks)
  19. Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.34 · 2.0% (1 of 50 decks)
  20. Lulu, Loyal Hollyphant // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.33 · 1.9% (1 of 54 decks)
  21. Aang, A Lot to Learn relevance 0.33 · 1.8% (1 of 55 decks)
  22. Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.27 · 1.1% (1 of 87 decks)
  23. Tana, the Bloodsower // Bruse Tarl, Boorish Herder relevance 0.27 · 1.1% (1 of 94 decks)

Parallel Cards

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
All parallel cards (1)
  1. Siege Wurm

Most Relevant

30

Showing 1-10 of 30

Page size
  • Impervious Greatwurm
    3.24 55.3%
    $4.78 €2.42
  • Worldspine Wurm
    2.60 50.8%
    $4.20 €2.51
  • Armada Wurm
    2.47 32.9%
    $0.49 €0.57
  • Novablast Wurm
    1.89 21.9%
    $2.05 €1.15
  • Engulfing Slagwurm
    1.79 25.6%
    $0.55 €0.52
  • Baru, Wurmspeaker
    1.72 23.2%
    $1.78 €0.56
  • Elderscale Wurm
    1.65 22.5%
    $2.87 €2.90
  • Sandwurm Convergence
    1.40 26.6%
    $0.36 €0.15
  • Pelakka Wurm
    1.38 20.5%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Penumbra Wurm
    1.36 17.7%
    $0.34 €0.22
All most relevant (30)
  1. Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.24 · 55.3% (588 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Worldspine Wurm relevance 2.60 · 50.8% (540 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Armada Wurm relevance 2.47 · 32.9% (350 of 1,064 decks)
  4. Novablast Wurm relevance 1.89 · 21.9% (233 of 1,064 decks)
  5. Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.79 · 25.6% (272 of 1,064 decks)
  6. Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.72 · 23.2% (247 of 1,064 decks)
  7. Elderscale Wurm relevance 1.65 · 22.5% (239 of 1,064 decks)
  8. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.40 · 26.6% (283 of 1,064 decks)
  9. Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.38 · 20.5% (218 of 1,064 decks)
  10. Penumbra Wurm relevance 1.36 · 17.7% (188 of 1,064 decks)
  11. Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.32 · 21.2% (226 of 1,064 decks)
  12. Enlisted Wurm relevance 1.30 · 15.3% (163 of 1,064 decks)
  13. Sifter Wurm relevance 1.27 · 16.5% (176 of 1,064 decks)
  14. Bookwurm relevance 1.21 · 16.1% (171 of 1,064 decks)
  15. Ravager Wurm relevance 1.18 · 14.3% (152 of 1,064 decks)
  16. Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.15 · 15.8% (168 of 1,064 decks)
  17. Emergent Woodwurm relevance 1.14 · 17.8% (189 of 1,064 decks)
  18. Advent of the Wurm relevance 1.13 · 14.4% (153 of 1,064 decks)
  19. Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.11 · 13.9% (148 of 1,064 decks)
  20. Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.09 · 21.0% (223 of 1,064 decks)
  21. Plated Slagwurm relevance 1.02 · 12.9% (137 of 1,064 decks)
  22. Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.99 · 13.6% (145 of 1,064 decks)
  23. Sundering Growth relevance 0.98 · 19.3% (205 of 1,064 decks)
  24. Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.98 · 22.3% (237 of 1,064 decks)
  25. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.91 · 13.0% (138 of 1,064 decks)
  26. Bramble Wurm relevance 0.91 · 12.3% (131 of 1,064 decks)
  27. Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.86 · 10.6% (113 of 1,064 decks)
  28. Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.82 · 17.0% (181 of 1,064 decks)
  29. Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.81 · 12.9% (137 of 1,064 decks)
  30. Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.77 · 20.9% (222 of 1,064 decks)

Creatures

32

Showing 1-10 of 32

Page size
  • Impervious Greatwurm
    3.24 55.3%
    $4.78 €2.42
  • Worldspine Wurm
    2.60 50.8%
    $4.20 €2.51
  • Armada Wurm
    2.47 32.9%
    $0.49 €0.57
  • Novablast Wurm
    1.89 21.9%
    $2.05 €1.15
  • Engulfing Slagwurm
    1.79 25.6%
    $0.55 €0.52
  • Baru, Wurmspeaker
    1.72 23.2%
    $1.78 €0.56
  • Elderscale Wurm
    1.65 22.5%
    $2.87 €2.90
  • Pelakka Wurm
    1.38 20.5%
    $0.28 €0.20
  • Penumbra Wurm
    1.36 17.7%
    $0.34 €0.22
  • Bellowing Tanglewurm
    1.32 21.2%
    $0.81 €0.91
All creatures (32)
  1. Impervious Greatwurm relevance 3.24 · 55.3% (588 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Worldspine Wurm relevance 2.60 · 50.8% (540 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Armada Wurm relevance 2.47 · 32.9% (350 of 1,064 decks)
  4. Novablast Wurm relevance 1.89 · 21.9% (233 of 1,064 decks)
  5. Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 1.79 · 25.6% (272 of 1,064 decks)
  6. Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 1.72 · 23.2% (247 of 1,064 decks)
  7. Elderscale Wurm relevance 1.65 · 22.5% (239 of 1,064 decks)
  8. Pelakka Wurm relevance 1.38 · 20.5% (218 of 1,064 decks)
  9. Penumbra Wurm relevance 1.36 · 17.7% (188 of 1,064 decks)
  10. Bellowing Tanglewurm relevance 1.32 · 21.2% (226 of 1,064 decks)
  11. Enlisted Wurm relevance 1.30 · 15.3% (163 of 1,064 decks)
  12. Sifter Wurm relevance 1.27 · 16.5% (176 of 1,064 decks)
  13. Bookwurm relevance 1.21 · 16.1% (171 of 1,064 decks)
  14. Ravager Wurm relevance 1.18 · 14.3% (152 of 1,064 decks)
  15. Panglacial Wurm relevance 1.15 · 15.8% (168 of 1,064 decks)
  16. Emergent Woodwurm relevance 1.14 · 17.8% (189 of 1,064 decks)
  17. Symbiotic Wurm relevance 1.11 · 13.9% (148 of 1,064 decks)
  18. Quilled Greatwurm relevance 1.09 · 21.0% (223 of 1,064 decks)
  19. Plated Slagwurm relevance 1.02 · 12.9% (137 of 1,064 decks)
  20. Greater Sandwurm relevance 0.99 · 13.6% (145 of 1,064 decks)
  21. Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.98 · 22.3% (237 of 1,064 decks)
  22. Colossal Rattlewurm relevance 0.91 · 13.0% (138 of 1,064 decks)
  23. Bramble Wurm relevance 0.91 · 12.3% (131 of 1,064 decks)
  24. Dirtcowl Wurm relevance 0.86 · 10.6% (113 of 1,064 decks)
  25. Defiler of Vigor relevance 0.82 · 17.0% (181 of 1,064 decks)
  26. Grothama, All-Devouring relevance 0.81 · 12.9% (137 of 1,064 decks)
  27. Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.77 · 20.9% (222 of 1,064 decks)
  28. Sumala Rumblers relevance 0.76 · 9.1% (97 of 1,064 decks)
  29. Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.68 · 14.1% (150 of 1,064 decks)
  30. Beanstalk Wurm // Plant Beans relevance 0.66 · 10.2% (109 of 1,064 decks)
  31. Sarinth Greatwurm relevance 0.63 · 8.7% (93 of 1,064 decks)
  32. Balustrade Wurm relevance 0.62 · 8.4% (89 of 1,064 decks)

Artifacts

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Selesnya Signet
    0.75 17.1%
    $0.25
All artifacts (1)
  1. Selesnya Signet relevance 0.75 · 17.1% (182 of 1,064 decks)

Enchantments

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Sandwurm Convergence
    1.40 26.6%
    $0.36 €0.15
  • Garruk's Uprising
    0.76 29.4%
    $0.57 €0.60
  • Growing Ranks
    0.68 11.9%
    $0.55 €0.61
All enchantments (3)
  1. Sandwurm Convergence relevance 1.40 · 26.6% (283 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.76 · 29.4% (313 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Growing Ranks relevance 0.68 · 11.9% (127 of 1,064 decks)

Instants

3

Showing 1-3 of 3

Page size
  • Advent of the Wurm
    1.13 14.4%
    $0.18 €0.28
  • Sundering Growth
    0.98 19.3%
    $0.35 €0.33
  • Rootborn Defenses
    0.71 15.5%
    $0.16
All instants (3)
  1. Advent of the Wurm relevance 1.13 · 14.4% (153 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Sundering Growth relevance 0.98 · 19.3% (205 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Rootborn Defenses relevance 0.71 · 15.5% (165 of 1,064 decks)

Sorceries

4

Showing 1-4 of 4

Page size
  • Crush of Wurms
    0.69 8.8%
    $1.62 €0.74
  • Cultivate
    0.69 39.2%
    $0.45 €0.48
  • Kodama's Reach
    0.64 27.3%
    $1.85 €1.52
  • Farseek
    0.61 32.8%
    $0.47 €0.79
All sorceries (4)
  1. Crush of Wurms relevance 0.69 · 8.8% (94 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Cultivate relevance 0.69 · 39.2% (417 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Kodama's Reach relevance 0.64 · 27.3% (290 of 1,064 decks)
  4. Farseek relevance 0.61 · 32.8% (349 of 1,064 decks)

Utility Lands

1

Showing 1-1 of 1

Page size
  • Shefet Dunes
    0.63 10.4%
    $0.30 €0.31
All utility lands (1)
  1. Shefet Dunes relevance 0.63 · 10.4% (111 of 1,064 decks)

Lands

6

Showing 1-6 of 6

Page size
  • Canopy Vista
    0.85 32.0%
    $0.27 €0.23
  • Temple Garden
    0.83 33.3%
    $7.15 €6.60
  • Sunpetal Grove
    0.79 28.5%
    $0.33 €0.39
  • Selesnya Sanctuary
    0.76 19.0%
    $0.34 €0.19
  • Jungle Shrine
    0.70 20.3%
    $0.37 €0.23
  • Creosote Heath
    0.66 11.4%
    $0.24 €0.16
All lands (6)
  1. Canopy Vista relevance 0.85 · 32.0% (341 of 1,064 decks)
  2. Temple Garden relevance 0.83 · 33.3% (354 of 1,064 decks)
  3. Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.79 · 28.5% (303 of 1,064 decks)
  4. Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.76 · 19.0% (202 of 1,064 decks)
  5. Jungle Shrine relevance 0.70 · 20.3% (216 of 1,064 decks)
  6. Creosote Heath relevance 0.66 · 11.4% (121 of 1,064 decks)

EDH data for Autochthon Wurm: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,064 real decks.