3030+34+3+2+3+5+3+
Color Identity Spread
25.2% Gruul
-
Naya 29,778 · 64.9%
-
Gruul 11,534 · 25.2%
-
Temur 3,135 · 6.8%
- Other (16) 1,402 · 3.1%
Commanders
Slinza, the Spiked Stampede 75.6% of decks
Slinza, the Spiked Stampede 75.6% of decks
Xenagos, God of Revels 51.9% of decks
Xenagos, God of Revels 51.9% of decks
Zilortha, Strength Incarnate 57.3% of decks
Zilortha, Strength Incarnate 57.3% of decks
Stonebrow, Krosan Hero 69.3% of decks
Stonebrow, Krosan Hero 69.3% of decks
Minsc & Boo, Timeless Heroes 20.5% of decks
Minsc & Boo, Timeless Heroes 20.5% of decks
General Marhault Elsdragon 26.8% of decks
General Marhault Elsdragon 26.8% of decks
Most Relevant
Elder Gargaroth 37.2% of decks
Elder Gargaroth 37.2% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 57.3% of decks
Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma 57.3% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 47.4% of decks
Ghalta, Primal Hunger 47.4% of decks
Thunderfoot Baloth 30.1% of decks
Thunderfoot Baloth 30.1% of decks
Anzrag, the Quake-Mole 35.1% of decks
Anzrag, the Quake-Mole 35.1% of decks
Krosan Warchief 19.7% of decks
Krosan Warchief 19.7% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (30)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 3.92 · 75.6% (2,436 of 3,223 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 3.43 · 51.9% (2,505 of 4,829 decks)
- Zilortha, Strength Incarnate relevance 3.30 · 57.3% (1,422 of 2,483 decks)
- Stonebrow, Krosan Hero relevance 2.41 · 69.3% (138 of 199 decks)
- Minsc & Boo, Timeless Heroes relevance 1.99 · 20.5% (957 of 4,660 decks)
- General Marhault Elsdragon relevance 1.86 · 26.8% (284 of 1,061 decks)
- Raph & Mikey, Troublemakers relevance 1.60 · 13.1% (1,165 of 8,890 decks)
- Owen Grady, Raptor Trainer relevance 1.38 · 57.1% (20 of 35 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 1.29 · 16.1% (158 of 984 decks)
- Hans Eriksson relevance 1.26 · 19.4% (87 of 449 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.13 · 20.3% (50 of 246 decks)
- Itzquinth, Firstborn of Gishath relevance 1.13 · 22.4% (41 of 183 decks)
- Absorbing Man and Titania relevance 1.11 · 23.0% (37 of 161 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 1.00 · 9.5% (219 of 2,308 decks)
- Tuya Bearclaw relevance 0.93 · 18.7% (28 of 150 decks)
- Alena, Kessig Trapper // Kodama of the East Tree relevance 0.82 · 18.0% (20 of 111 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.81 · 46.2% (6 of 13 decks)
- Nikya of the Old Ways relevance 0.80 · 7.6% (139 of 1,827 decks)
- Ruric Thar, the Unbowed relevance 0.75 · 6.1% (230 of 3,795 decks)
- Red XIII, Proud Warrior relevance 0.73 · 12.6% (26 of 206 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.70 · 6.6% (122 of 1,858 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 0.68 · 20.0% (10 of 50 decks)
- Ruby, Daring Tracker relevance 0.66 · 5.7% (149 of 2,596 decks)
- Radha, Heart of Keld relevance 0.62 · 8.3% (36 of 433 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Alena, Kessig Trapper relevance 0.53 · 26.7% (4 of 15 decks)
- Targ Nar, Demon-Fang Gnoll relevance 0.49 · 8.1% (17 of 209 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.43 · 14.7% (5 of 34 decks)
- Svella, Ice Shaper relevance 0.41 · 4.0% (55 of 1,382 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (268 of 10,774 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.38 · 11.9% (5 of 42 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.14 · 37.2% (4,290 of 11,534 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.09 · 57.3% (6,614 of 11,534 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.96 · 47.4% (5,468 of 11,534 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.94 · 30.1% (3,473 of 11,534 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.89 · 35.1% (4,050 of 11,534 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.85 · 19.7% (2,268 of 11,534 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (2,333 of 11,534 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 20.4% (2,356 of 11,534 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (3,138 of 11,534 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.73 · 16.4% (1,895 of 11,534 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (2,028 of 11,534 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (1,861 of 11,534 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (2,664 of 11,534 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (2,278 of 11,534 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.71 · 31.4% (3,620 of 11,534 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.71 · 26.3% (3,037 of 11,534 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (4,379 of 11,534 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.70 · 29.1% (3,355 of 11,534 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.70 · 43.5% (5,021 of 11,534 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.68 · 47.2% (5,447 of 11,534 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (1,815 of 11,534 decks)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (3,496 of 11,534 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.66 · 36.4% (4,204 of 11,534 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.65 · 19.4% (2,239 of 11,534 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (2,003 of 11,534 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (1,890 of 11,534 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (1,716 of 11,534 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.60 · 45.4% (5,241 of 11,534 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (2,013 of 11,534 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.59 · 26.7% (3,083 of 11,534 decks)
All creatures (34)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 1.14 · 37.2% (4,290 of 11,534 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.09 · 57.3% (6,614 of 11,534 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.96 · 47.4% (5,468 of 11,534 decks)
- Thunderfoot Baloth relevance 0.94 · 30.1% (3,473 of 11,534 decks)
- Anzrag, the Quake-Mole relevance 0.89 · 35.1% (4,050 of 11,534 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.85 · 19.7% (2,268 of 11,534 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.83 · 20.2% (2,333 of 11,534 decks)
- Spellbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.82 · 20.4% (2,356 of 11,534 decks)
- Frenzied Baloth relevance 0.77 · 27.2% (3,138 of 11,534 decks)
- Woodland Liege relevance 0.73 · 16.4% (1,895 of 11,534 decks)
- Herald of Ilharg relevance 0.73 · 17.6% (2,028 of 11,534 decks)
- Wirewood Savage relevance 0.72 · 16.1% (1,861 of 11,534 decks)
- Ojer Kaslem, Deepest Growth // Temple of Cultivation relevance 0.72 · 23.1% (2,664 of 11,534 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 0.72 · 19.8% (2,278 of 11,534 decks)
- Selvala, Heart of the Wilds relevance 0.71 · 31.4% (3,620 of 11,534 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.71 · 38.0% (4,379 of 11,534 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.70 · 29.1% (3,355 of 11,534 decks)
- Herd Baloth relevance 0.68 · 15.7% (1,815 of 11,534 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.66 · 36.4% (4,204 of 11,534 decks)
- Ilharg, the Raze-Boar relevance 0.65 · 19.4% (2,239 of 11,534 decks)
- Spearbreaker Behemoth relevance 0.65 · 17.4% (2,003 of 11,534 decks)
- Kona, Rescue Beastie relevance 0.61 · 16.4% (1,890 of 11,534 decks)
- Ulvenwald Oddity // Ulvenwald Behemoth relevance 0.61 · 14.9% (1,716 of 11,534 decks)
- Gruul Ragebeast relevance 0.59 · 17.5% (2,013 of 11,534 decks)
- Manglehorn relevance 0.57 · 17.6% (2,030 of 11,534 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.56 · 16.0% (1,840 of 11,534 decks)
- Pathbreaker Ibex relevance 0.56 · 15.6% (1,799 of 11,534 decks)
- Rampaging Baloths relevance 0.56 · 24.6% (2,835 of 11,534 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.56 · 26.9% (3,108 of 11,534 decks)
- Proud Wildbonder relevance 0.56 · 12.9% (1,487 of 11,534 decks)
- Ghalta, Stampede Tyrant relevance 0.55 · 17.6% (2,025 of 11,534 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 0.55 · 26.7% (3,082 of 11,534 decks)
- Hulking Raptor relevance 0.54 · 14.0% (1,617 of 11,534 decks)
- Dragonborn Champion relevance 0.53 · 17.5% (2,015 of 11,534 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.58 · 22.2% (2,557 of 11,534 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.56 · 27.4% (3,163 of 11,534 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.53 · 13.7% (1,577 of 11,534 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Elemental Bond relevance 0.67 · 30.3% (3,496 of 11,534 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.55 · 37.7% (4,351 of 11,534 decks)
All instants (3)
- Ram Through relevance 0.71 · 26.3% (3,037 of 11,534 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.68 · 47.2% (5,447 of 11,534 decks)
- Hunter's Insight relevance 0.53 · 23.5% (2,710 of 11,534 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.70 · 43.5% (5,021 of 11,534 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.60 · 45.4% (5,241 of 11,534 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 0.59 · 26.7% (3,083 of 11,534 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (2,249 of 11,534 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.52 · 16.6% (1,913 of 11,534 decks)
All utility lands (3)
- Contested Cliffs relevance 0.64 · 15.1% (1,737 of 11,534 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.61 · 42.9% (4,953 of 11,534 decks)
- Castle Garenbrig relevance 0.54 · 21.1% (2,435 of 11,534 decks)
EDH data for Quartzwood Crasher: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 11,534 real decks.























































