Obsessive Search
Played in 179 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.0% Simic
All commanders (8)
- Raised by Giants // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.40 · 5.0% (5 of 101 decks)
- Master Chef // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 1.33 · 2.9% (6 of 204 decks)
- Jadzi, Oracle of Arcavios // Journey to the Oracle relevance 1.26 · 1.0% (12 of 1,187 decks)
- Zellix, Sanity Flayer // Hardy Outlander relevance 0.93 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Kianne, Corrupted Memory relevance 0.91 · 1.1% (5 of 444 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // The Prismatic Piper relevance 0.64 · 11.1% (1 of 9 decks)
- Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix // Esior, Wardwing Familiar relevance 0.62 · 9.1% (1 of 11 decks)
- Kianne, Dean of Substance // Imbraham, Dean of Theory relevance 0.38 · 1.4% (1 of 73 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Consider relevance 1.62 · 39.7% (71 of 179 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.48 · 54.2% (97 of 179 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.34 · 20.7% (37 of 179 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.25 · 25.1% (45 of 179 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.02 · 15.6% (28 of 179 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 1.01 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.99 · 49.2% (88 of 179 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.93 · 22.3% (40 of 179 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.91 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.91 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.90 · 34.1% (61 of 179 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.88 · 23.5% (42 of 179 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (29 of 179 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (33 of 179 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.80 · 30.7% (55 of 179 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.79 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.79 · 15.6% (28 of 179 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.76 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.73 · 26.8% (48 of 179 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.65 · 10.1% (18 of 179 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (21 of 179 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.55 · 31.3% (56 of 179 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.51 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (31 of 179 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
All creatures (4)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Laboratory Maniac relevance 0.42 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.37 · 29.1% (52 of 179 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (19 of 179 decks)
All enchantments (1)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.41 · 16.2% (29 of 179 decks)
All instants (27)
- Consider relevance 1.62 · 39.7% (71 of 179 decks)
- Opt relevance 1.48 · 54.2% (97 of 179 decks)
- Peek relevance 1.34 · 20.7% (37 of 179 decks)
- Thought Scour relevance 1.25 · 25.1% (45 of 179 decks)
- Quicken relevance 1.02 · 15.6% (28 of 179 decks)
- Visions of Beyond relevance 1.01 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.99 · 49.2% (88 of 179 decks)
- Fleeting Distraction relevance 0.91 · 14.5% (26 of 179 decks)
- Disrupt relevance 0.91 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Frantic Search relevance 0.90 · 34.1% (61 of 179 decks)
- Leap relevance 0.83 · 14.0% (25 of 179 decks)
- Charge Through relevance 0.82 · 16.2% (29 of 179 decks)
- Twisted Image relevance 0.79 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Shadow Rift relevance 0.76 · 15.1% (27 of 179 decks)
- Cerulean Wisps relevance 0.64 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Lull relevance 0.61 · 11.2% (20 of 179 decks)
- Curate relevance 0.51 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.48 · 17.3% (31 of 179 decks)
- Keep Safe relevance 0.43 · 7.8% (14 of 179 decks)
- Tolarian Winds relevance 0.43 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Brainsurge relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (22 of 179 decks)
- Think Twice relevance 0.42 · 8.9% (16 of 179 decks)
- High Tide relevance 0.40 · 10.1% (18 of 179 decks)
- Moment's Peace relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Snap relevance 0.38 · 11.7% (21 of 179 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.37 · 23.5% (42 of 179 decks)
- Auroral Procession relevance 0.36 · 10.6% (19 of 179 decks)
All sorceries (16)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.93 · 22.3% (40 of 179 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.88 · 23.5% (42 of 179 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.81 · 18.4% (33 of 179 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.80 · 30.7% (55 of 179 decks)
- Careful Study relevance 0.79 · 15.6% (28 of 179 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.73 · 26.8% (48 of 179 decks)
- Unending Whisper relevance 0.65 · 10.1% (18 of 179 decks)
- Chart a Course relevance 0.56 · 12.8% (23 of 179 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.56 · 11.7% (21 of 179 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.55 · 31.3% (56 of 179 decks)
- Chatterstorm relevance 0.46 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.42 · 30.2% (54 of 179 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.41 · 8.9% (16 of 179 decks)
- Pym Particles relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (15 of 179 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.38 · 9.5% (17 of 179 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (19 of 179 decks)
All lands (2)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.42 · 21.2% (38 of 179 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.39 · 24.0% (43 of 179 decks)
EDH data for Obsessive Search: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 179 real decks.