Ivorytusk Fortress
Played in 158 Witch-Maw decks
130+31+8+2+2+1+1+5+
Color Identity Spread
9.6% Witch-Maw
-
Abzan 1,351 · 81.8%
-
Witch-Maw 158 · 9.6%
-
Five-Color 129 · 7.8%
- Other (3) 14 · 0.8%
Commanders
Most Relevant
Inspiring Call 62.0% of decks
Inspiring Call 62.0% of decks
Abzan Falconer 48.7% of decks
Abzan Falconer 48.7% of decks
Master Biomancer 55.1% of decks
Master Biomancer 55.1% of decks
Corpsejack Menace 56.3% of decks
Corpsejack Menace 56.3% of decks
Hardened Scales 65.2% of decks
Hardened Scales 65.2% of decks
Hamza, Guardian of Arashin 31.6% of decks
Hamza, Guardian of Arashin 31.6% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (1)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker relevance 1.73 · 3.6% (43 of 1,188 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.64 · 62.0% (98 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 1.60 · 48.7% (77 of 158 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.58 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.54 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.49 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 1.39 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.39 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.37 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.33 · 57.6% (91 of 158 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 1.33 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.33 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.24 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.22 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 1.17 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 1.08 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.06 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 1.03 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.00 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.99 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.94 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.92 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.92 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.90 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.90 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.85 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.84 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.84 · 49.4% (78 of 158 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.84 · 29.7% (47 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.82 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.82 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
All creatures (31)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 1.60 · 48.7% (77 of 158 decks)
- Master Biomancer relevance 1.58 · 55.1% (87 of 158 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 1.54 · 56.3% (89 of 158 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 1.39 · 31.6% (50 of 158 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 1.39 · 59.5% (94 of 158 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 1.33 · 57.6% (91 of 158 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 1.33 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 1.33 · 44.9% (71 of 158 decks)
- Kalonian Hydra relevance 1.24 · 41.8% (66 of 158 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 1.08 · 27.2% (43 of 158 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.06 · 32.3% (51 of 158 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 1.03 · 30.4% (48 of 158 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 1.00 · 33.5% (53 of 158 decks)
- Mer-Ek Nightblade relevance 0.99 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.94 · 18.4% (29 of 158 decks)
- Juniper Order Ranger relevance 0.92 · 20.9% (33 of 158 decks)
- Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.90 · 24.1% (38 of 158 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.85 · 26.6% (42 of 158 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.84 · 27.8% (44 of 158 decks)
- Deepglow Skate relevance 0.84 · 49.4% (78 of 158 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.82 · 31.0% (49 of 158 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.82 · 20.3% (32 of 158 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.79 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.78 · 22.8% (36 of 158 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.75 · 29.1% (46 of 158 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.74 · 13.9% (22 of 158 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.74 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.72 · 17.7% (28 of 158 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.70 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.69 · 15.8% (25 of 158 decks)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.68 · 15.2% (24 of 158 decks)
All enchantments (8)
- Hardened Scales relevance 1.49 · 65.2% (103 of 158 decks)
- Simic Ascendancy relevance 1.37 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Bred for the Hunt relevance 1.22 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 1.17 · 39.2% (62 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.92 · 19.0% (30 of 158 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.84 · 29.7% (47 of 158 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.81 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.73 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
All instants (2)
- Inspiring Call relevance 1.64 · 62.0% (98 of 158 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.71 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.90 · 23.4% (37 of 158 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.69 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.69 · 16.5% (26 of 158 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.74 · 25.3% (40 of 158 decks)
All lands (5)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.78 · 49.4% (78 of 158 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.74 · 35.4% (56 of 158 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.73 · 46.2% (73 of 158 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.72 · 22.2% (35 of 158 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.68 · 36.7% (58 of 158 decks)
EDH data for Ivorytusk Fortress: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 158 real decks.



































