Liminal Hold
Played in 140 Naya decks
Color Identity Spread
30+9+5+14+6+6+1+4+5+
All most relevant (30)
- Keep Out relevance 1.30 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 1.02 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.79 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.76 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.75 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Chains of Custody relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Adept Watershaper relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Rooftop Percher relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Kinbinding relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.55 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Path to Redemption relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Moon-Vigil Adherents relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Arena Rector relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.48 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
All creatures (9)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 1.02 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Adept Watershaper relevance 0.62 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Rooftop Percher relevance 0.59 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Somberwald Sage relevance 0.57 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Moon-Vigil Adherents relevance 0.54 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Quirion Elves relevance 0.52 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Arena Rector relevance 0.50 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Changeling Wayfinder relevance 0.46 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Restoration Angel relevance 0.45 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Firdoch Core relevance 0.76 · 17.1% (24 of 140 decks)
- Stalactite Dagger relevance 0.52 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.48 · 18.6% (26 of 140 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.45 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.42 · 12.9% (18 of 140 decks)
All enchantments (14)
- Banishing Light relevance 0.97 · 20.0% (28 of 140 decks)
- Shimmerwilds Growth relevance 0.75 · 14.3% (20 of 140 decks)
- Chains of Custody relevance 0.72 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Abundant Growth relevance 0.58 · 15.0% (21 of 140 decks)
- Kinbinding relevance 0.58 · 12.1% (17 of 140 decks)
- Grasp of Fate relevance 0.57 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Prismatic Undercurrents relevance 0.56 · 10.7% (15 of 140 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.55 · 8.6% (12 of 140 decks)
- Path to Redemption relevance 0.55 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.48 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.47 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Pacifism relevance 0.45 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Web Up relevance 0.44 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
All instants (6)
- Keep Out relevance 1.30 · 19.3% (27 of 140 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.79 · 22.1% (31 of 140 decks)
- Reckless Ransacking relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Shock relevance 0.46 · 7.9% (11 of 140 decks)
- Reclaim relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Pyretic Ritual relevance 0.42 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Impolite Entrance relevance 0.47 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Knockout Maneuver relevance 0.46 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.45 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Tend the Sprigs relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Pursue the Past relevance 0.43 · 7.1% (10 of 140 decks)
- Spider Food relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (9 of 140 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Vivien on the Hunt relevance 0.50 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Fields of Strife relevance 0.49 · 9.3% (13 of 140 decks)
- Sun-Blessed Peak relevance 0.48 · 11.4% (16 of 140 decks)
- Suburban Sanctuary relevance 0.47 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
- Graypelt Refuge relevance 0.44 · 10.0% (14 of 140 decks)
All lands (5)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.93 · 32.1% (45 of 140 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.84 · 27.9% (39 of 140 decks)
- Wind-Scarred Crag relevance 0.84 · 26.4% (37 of 140 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.60 · 47.9% (67 of 140 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.44 · 25.7% (36 of 140 decks)
EDH data for Liminal Hold: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 140 real decks.


















































