Those Who Serve
Played in 59 Selesnya decks
Color Identity Spread
27.6% Selesnya
- Selesnya 59 · 27.6%
- White 51 · 23.8%
- Esper 29 · 13.6%
- Azorius 28 · 13.1%
- Orzhov 22 · 10.3%
- Abzan 6 · 2.8%
- Other (8) 19 · 8.9%
All commanders (2)
- Jasmine Boreal of the Seven relevance 2.78 · 1.3% (55 of 4,151 decks)
- Lagorin, Soul of Alacria relevance 0.48 · 1.3% (1 of 77 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.71 · 69.5% (41 of 59 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.61 · 67.8% (40 of 59 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 2.42 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.40 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 2.39 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 2.31 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.29 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.28 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.23 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.21 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.14 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.13 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.06 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.03 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- Armored Warhorse relevance 1.97 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.97 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.93 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Kami of Old Stone relevance 1.90 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.88 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.88 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.87 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.79 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.78 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.62 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.61 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.59 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.58 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.49 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.46 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.44 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
All creatures (46)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 2.61 · 67.8% (40 of 59 decks)
- Grizzled Leotau relevance 2.42 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Leatherback Baloth relevance 2.40 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Looming Altisaur relevance 2.39 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Yoked Ox relevance 2.31 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Gigantosaurus relevance 2.29 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Watchwolf relevance 2.28 · 59.3% (35 of 59 decks)
- Kalonian Tusker relevance 2.23 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Savannah Lions relevance 2.21 · 55.9% (33 of 59 decks)
- Terrian, World Tyrant relevance 2.14 · 54.2% (32 of 59 decks)
- Centaur Courser relevance 2.13 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Vorstclaw relevance 2.06 · 49.2% (29 of 59 decks)
- Ruxa, Patient Professor relevance 2.03 · 52.5% (31 of 59 decks)
- Armored Warhorse relevance 1.97 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Armored Wolf-Rider relevance 1.97 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Jibbirik Omnivore relevance 1.93 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Kami of Old Stone relevance 1.90 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Ancient Brontodon relevance 1.88 · 44.1% (26 of 59 decks)
- Orazca Frillback relevance 1.88 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 1.87 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Fang-Druid Summoner relevance 1.79 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Sundial, Dawn Tyrant relevance 1.78 · 42.4% (25 of 59 decks)
- Raptor Companion relevance 1.62 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Primordial Wurm relevance 1.61 · 37.3% (22 of 59 decks)
- Alpine Grizzly relevance 1.59 · 39.0% (23 of 59 decks)
- Elvish Warrior relevance 1.58 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Swordwise Centaur relevance 1.49 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Colossapede relevance 1.46 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 1.44 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Enormous Baloth relevance 1.42 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 1.42 · 35.6% (21 of 59 decks)
- Nyxborn Colossus relevance 1.41 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Elite Vanguard relevance 1.39 · 28.8% (17 of 59 decks)
- Rumbling Baloth relevance 1.39 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Shepherd of the Flock // Usher to Safety relevance 1.39 · 30.5% (18 of 59 decks)
- Runeclaw Bear relevance 1.37 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 1.30 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Expedition Envoy relevance 1.26 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Prowling Caracal relevance 1.25 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Grizzly Bears relevance 1.24 · 25.4% (15 of 59 decks)
- Cheeky House-Mouse // Squeak By relevance 1.24 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
- Oreskos Swiftclaw relevance 1.16 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Hollowhenge Beast relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Craw Wurm relevance 1.13 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
- Blade of the Sixth Pride relevance 1.12 · 23.7% (14 of 59 decks)
- Alpha Tyrranax relevance 1.12 · 16.9% (10 of 59 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Muraganda Petroglyphs relevance 2.71 · 69.5% (41 of 59 decks)
- Gaea's Anthem relevance 1.38 · 32.2% (19 of 59 decks)
- Anthem of Champions relevance 1.22 · 40.7% (24 of 59 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 1.15 · 27.1% (16 of 59 decks)
EDH data for Those Who Serve: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 59 real decks.