Adaptive Snapjaw
Played in 710 decks
Change per day
Color Identity Spread
Commanders
30
Commanders
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All commanders (30)
- Zilortha, Strength Incarnate relevance 2.40 · 1.9% (44 of 2,353 decks)
- Roalesk, Apex Hybrid relevance 2.03 · 5.4% (11 of 205 decks)
- Slinza, the Spiked Stampede relevance 2.01 · 1.2% (37 of 3,044 decks)
- Radagast, Wizard of Wilds relevance 1.55 · 2.4% (9 of 368 decks)
- Prime Speaker Zegana relevance 1.52 · 2.0% (10 of 509 decks)
- Spider-Ham, Peter Porker relevance 1.42 · 3.0% (7 of 234 decks)
- Genghis Frog relevance 1.39 · 2.0% (8 of 407 decks)
- Tawnos, the Toymaker relevance 1.34 · 1.3% (10 of 767 decks)
- Vorel of the Hull Clade relevance 1.26 · 1.2% (9 of 740 decks)
- Questing Beast relevance 1.17 · 1.6% (7 of 451 decks)
- Grunn, the Lonely King relevance 0.98 · 1.4% (5 of 353 decks)
- Anara, Wolvid Familiar // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.94 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Kamahl, Heart of Krosa // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.93 · 100.0% (1 of 1 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.84 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Polukranos, World Eater relevance 0.83 · 4.3% (2 of 46 decks)
- Syr Faren, the Hengehammer relevance 0.80 · 3.9% (2 of 51 decks)
- Hulkling, Burgeoning Bruiser relevance 0.78 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.78 · 33.3% (1 of 3 decks)
- Pippin, Warden of Isengard relevance 0.77 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Sophina, Spearsage Deserter // Othelm, Sigardian Outcast relevance 0.68 · 2.7% (1 of 37 decks)
- Spider-Rex, Daring Dino relevance 0.67 · 2.0% (2 of 101 decks)
- Jasmine Boreal relevance 0.66 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Ghalta the Unstoppable relevance 0.66 · 1.9% (2 of 107 decks)
- Lizard, Connors's Curse relevance 0.62 · 1.6% (2 of 129 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.61 · 1.4% (1 of 71 decks)
- Slurrk, All-Ingesting // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist relevance 0.61 · 1.9% (1 of 53 decks)
- Halsin, Emerald Archdruid // Master Chef relevance 0.58 · 7.1% (1 of 14 decks)
- Durnan of the Yawning Portal // Acolyte of Bahamut relevance 0.47 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Thriss, Nantuko Primus relevance 0.47 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Kodama of the East Tree // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.44 · 2.4% (1 of 42 decks)
Parallel Cards
3
Parallel Cards
Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All parallel cards (3)
Most Relevant
30
Most Relevant
30Showing 1-10 of 30
Page size
All most relevant (30)
- Battering Krasis relevance 1.65 · 18.2% (129 of 710 decks)
- Crocanura relevance 1.21 · 16.2% (115 of 710 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 1.10 · 14.2% (101 of 710 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.95 · 12.1% (86 of 710 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 0.93 · 11.3% (80 of 710 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (90 of 710 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.80 · 8.9% (63 of 710 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.76 · 12.7% (90 of 710 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.73 · 10.6% (75 of 710 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (104 of 710 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.72 · 28.0% (199 of 710 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.68 · 7.5% (53 of 710 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (71 of 710 decks)
- Arborback Stomper relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (53 of 710 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (113 of 710 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.62 · 9.3% (66 of 710 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 29.7% (211 of 710 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (62 of 710 decks)
- Simic Fluxmage relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (46 of 710 decks)
- Deadly Insect relevance 0.60 · 6.2% (44 of 710 decks)
- Gigapede relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (47 of 710 decks)
- Bioshift relevance 0.59 · 8.5% (60 of 710 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.57 · 7.7% (55 of 710 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.57 · 24.6% (175 of 710 decks)
- Watchful Radstag relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (64 of 710 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.54 · 31.1% (221 of 710 decks)
- Beacon Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 5.6% (40 of 710 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (159 of 710 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (65 of 710 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (51 of 710 decks)
Creatures
41
Creatures
41 Showing 1-10 of 41
Page size
All creatures (41)
- Battering Krasis relevance 1.65 · 18.2% (129 of 710 decks)
- Crocanura relevance 1.21 · 16.2% (115 of 710 decks)
- Renegade Krasis relevance 1.10 · 14.2% (101 of 710 decks)
- Elusive Krasis relevance 0.95 · 12.1% (86 of 710 decks)
- Shambleshark relevance 0.93 · 11.3% (80 of 710 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.86 · 12.7% (90 of 710 decks)
- Conifer Strider relevance 0.80 · 8.9% (63 of 710 decks)
- Aggressive Mammoth relevance 0.76 · 12.7% (90 of 710 decks)
- Experiment One relevance 0.73 · 10.6% (75 of 710 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.72 · 14.6% (104 of 710 decks)
- Ayumi, the Last Visitor relevance 0.68 · 7.5% (53 of 710 decks)
- Phytotitan relevance 0.68 · 10.0% (71 of 710 decks)
- Arborback Stomper relevance 0.67 · 7.5% (53 of 710 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 0.63 · 15.9% (113 of 710 decks)
- Nylea's Forerunner relevance 0.61 · 8.7% (62 of 710 decks)
- Simic Fluxmage relevance 0.60 · 6.5% (46 of 710 decks)
- Deadly Insect relevance 0.60 · 6.2% (44 of 710 decks)
- Gigapede relevance 0.59 · 6.6% (47 of 710 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.57 · 7.7% (55 of 710 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.57 · 24.6% (175 of 710 decks)
- Watchful Radstag relevance 0.55 · 9.0% (64 of 710 decks)
- Beacon Behemoth relevance 0.54 · 5.6% (40 of 710 decks)
- Agonasaur Rex relevance 0.52 · 9.2% (65 of 710 decks)
- Garruk's Gorehorn relevance 0.51 · 7.2% (51 of 710 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.51 · 13.8% (98 of 710 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.51 · 9.0% (64 of 710 decks)
- Clinging Anemones relevance 0.51 · 5.5% (39 of 710 decks)
- Elder Gargaroth relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (72 of 710 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.50 · 12.4% (88 of 710 decks)
- Altanak, the Thrice-Called relevance 0.49 · 7.6% (54 of 710 decks)
- Siege Behemoth relevance 0.49 · 7.3% (52 of 710 decks)
- Quakestrider Ceratops relevance 0.49 · 8.2% (58 of 710 decks)
- Insatiable Souleater relevance 0.49 · 4.8% (34 of 710 decks)
- Kalakscion, Hunger Tyrant relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (56 of 710 decks)
- Krosan Warchief relevance 0.48 · 6.6% (47 of 710 decks)
- Fathom Mage relevance 0.48 · 10.3% (73 of 710 decks)
- Caller of the Pack relevance 0.47 · 6.5% (46 of 710 decks)
- Yargle, Glutton of Urborg relevance 0.47 · 7.5% (53 of 710 decks)
- Advocate of the Beast relevance 0.47 · 5.2% (37 of 710 decks)
- Tyranid Prime relevance 0.45 · 6.5% (46 of 710 decks)
- Challenger Troll relevance 0.44 · 6.3% (45 of 710 decks)
Enchantments
4
Enchantments
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All enchantments (4)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.72 · 28.0% (199 of 710 decks)
- Forced Adaptation relevance 0.62 · 9.3% (66 of 710 decks)
- Colossal Majesty relevance 0.48 · 10.1% (72 of 710 decks)
- Unnatural Growth relevance 0.47 · 12.7% (90 of 710 decks)
Instants
2
Instants
2 
All instants (2)
- Bioshift relevance 0.59 · 8.5% (60 of 710 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.50 · 9.6% (68 of 710 decks)
Sorceries
3
Sorceries
3 Showing 1-3 of 3
Page size
All sorceries (3)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.62 · 29.7% (211 of 710 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.54 · 31.1% (221 of 710 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.52 · 22.4% (159 of 710 decks)
EDH data for Adaptive Snapjaw: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 710 real decks.