Iron Lance
Played in 20 Azorius decks
Color Identity Spread
32.8% Azorius
30+21+8+2+8+6+3+2+
All most relevant (30)
- Infiltrate relevance 6.09 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Implement of Improvement relevance 5.97 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 5.83 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 5.81 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 5.79 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 5.79 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Investigator's Journal relevance 5.78 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Intervene relevance 5.76 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Inquisitorial Rosette relevance 5.75 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Inspired Inventor relevance 5.73 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Illvoi Operative relevance 5.71 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Increasing Confusion relevance 5.70 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 5.63 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Interjection relevance 5.61 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Kraken's Eye relevance 5.57 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Index relevance 5.53 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Iridescent Angel relevance 5.52 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Invasion of Vryn // Overloaded Mage-Ring relevance 5.52 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 5.52 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Intervention Pact relevance 5.51 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Leather Armor relevance 5.50 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Invisible Force Field relevance 5.50 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 5.49 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 5.48 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inquisitor Exarch relevance 5.47 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Irregular Cohort relevance 5.46 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Jailbreak relevance 5.42 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 5.39 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 5.39 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Jeering Homunculus relevance 5.36 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
All creatures (21)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 5.83 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Inverted Iceberg // Iceberg Titan relevance 5.81 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Inspired Inventor relevance 5.73 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Illvoi Operative relevance 5.71 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Iridescent Angel relevance 5.52 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Isamaru, Hound of Konda relevance 5.49 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inquisitor Exarch relevance 5.47 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Irregular Cohort relevance 5.46 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Indomitable Ancients relevance 5.39 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Jeering Homunculus relevance 5.36 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Iron Giant relevance 5.30 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Hydraulic Helper relevance 5.29 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Jetfire, Ingenious Scientist // Jetfire, Air Guardian relevance 5.29 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Jeskai Barricade relevance 5.24 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Impaler Shrike relevance 5.24 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inspiring Paladin relevance 5.23 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Illvoi Galeblade relevance 5.21 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Illusory Ambusher relevance 5.19 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Jushi Apprentice // Tomoya the Revealer relevance 5.17 · 75.0% (15 of 20 decks)
- Kor Skyfisher relevance 5.17 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inkwell Leviathan relevance 5.17 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
All artifacts (8)
- Implement of Improvement relevance 5.97 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Investigator's Journal relevance 5.78 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Inquisitorial Rosette relevance 5.75 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 5.63 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Kraken's Eye relevance 5.57 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Leather Armor relevance 5.50 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Lantern of the Lost relevance 5.36 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 5.20 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Ior Ruin Expedition relevance 5.79 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- In Bolas's Clutches relevance 5.48 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
All instants (8)
- Infiltrate relevance 6.09 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Intervene relevance 5.76 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Interjection relevance 5.61 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Illusion of Choice relevance 5.52 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Intervention Pact relevance 5.51 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Invisible Force Field relevance 5.50 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inspired Charge relevance 5.39 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Ignite the Beacon relevance 5.32 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
All sorceries (6)
- Ideas Unbound relevance 5.79 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Increasing Confusion relevance 5.70 · 90.0% (18 of 20 decks)
- Index relevance 5.53 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Jailbreak relevance 5.42 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Inscription of Insight relevance 5.25 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Introduction to Annihilation relevance 5.19 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
All battles (3)
- Invasion of Vryn // Overloaded Mage-Ring relevance 5.52 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Invasion of Kamigawa // Rooftop Saboteurs relevance 5.31 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
- Invasion of Dominaria // Serra Faithkeeper relevance 5.24 · 80.0% (16 of 20 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Ice Floe relevance 5.38 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
- Interplanar Beacon relevance 5.29 · 85.0% (17 of 20 decks)
EDH data for Iron Lance: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 20 real decks.

















































