Chorus of Might
Played in 107 Gruul decks
Color Identity Spread
8.5% Gruul
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (10)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 1.57 · 100.0% (2 of 2 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Jeska, Thrice Reborn relevance 1.03 · 2.6% (3 of 116 decks)
- Krark, the Thumbless // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 1.00 · 6.5% (2 of 31 decks)
- Rulik Mons, Warren Chief relevance 0.91 · 1.0% (4 of 399 decks)
- Tana, the Bloodsower // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.85 · 3.1% (2 of 64 decks)
- Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.81 · 25.0% (1 of 4 decks)
- Jolene, Plundering Pugilist relevance 0.74 · 1.8% (2 of 113 decks)
- Raised by Giants // Livaan, Cultist of Tiamat relevance 0.56 · 3.7% (1 of 27 decks)
- Meet and Greet "Sisay" relevance 0.50 · 2.3% (1 of 43 decks)
- Kraven, Proud Predator relevance 0.40 · 1.1% (1 of 95 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Battle Hymn relevance 0.86 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Saproling Symbiosis relevance 0.68 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Phytoburst relevance 0.57 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Raphael, Tough Turtle relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.53 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Dragon Fodder relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Brute Strength relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Roughshod Duo relevance 0.47 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.47 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Junkblade Bruiser relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.43 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.42 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Goblin Matron relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.42 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Xenagos, the Reveler relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.40 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
All creatures (12)
- Raphael, Tough Turtle relevance 0.54 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Mycoloth relevance 0.54 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Grumgully, the Generous relevance 0.53 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Roughshod Duo relevance 0.47 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Junkblade Bruiser relevance 0.45 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Goblin Matron relevance 0.42 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Frog Butler relevance 0.40 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Burning-Tree Emissary relevance 0.39 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.39 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Wandertale Mentor relevance 0.38 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Teapot Slinger relevance 0.37 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Krenko, Mob Boss relevance 0.37 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.43 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.50 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.44 · 15.0% (16 of 107 decks)
- Sylvan Scavenging relevance 0.35 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
All instants (16)
- Battle Hymn relevance 0.86 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Might of the Masses relevance 0.58 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.58 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Fog relevance 0.57 · 19.6% (21 of 107 decks)
- Brute Strength relevance 0.50 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Naturalize relevance 0.45 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Artifact Mutation relevance 0.45 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Run Amok relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Destructive Revelry relevance 0.42 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Fling relevance 0.40 · 13.1% (14 of 107 decks)
- Biosynthic Burst relevance 0.38 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
- Lightning Strike relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Bulk Up relevance 0.34 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
- Gold Rush relevance 0.34 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Temur Battle Rage relevance 0.33 · 10.3% (11 of 107 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Saproling Symbiosis relevance 0.68 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Phytoburst relevance 0.57 · 8.4% (9 of 107 decks)
- Crash Through relevance 0.52 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Dragon Fodder relevance 0.51 · 11.2% (12 of 107 decks)
- Overrun relevance 0.47 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.42 · 18.7% (20 of 107 decks)
- Explore relevance 0.42 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.40 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Krenko's Command relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.35 · 7.5% (8 of 107 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Xenagos, the Reveler relevance 0.41 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.70 · 30.8% (33 of 107 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.44 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.37 · 20.6% (22 of 107 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.34 · 9.3% (10 of 107 decks)
All lands (3)
- Gruul Guildgate relevance 0.71 · 22.4% (24 of 107 decks)
- Timber Gorge relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (13 of 107 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.42 · 27.1% (29 of 107 decks)
EDH data for Chorus of Might: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 107 real decks.