Genesis Ultimatum
Played in 505 Glint-Eye decks
530+18+4+5+6+10+4+3+
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Glint-Eye
-
Temur 9,664 · 46.6%
-
Five-Color 7,632 · 36.8%
-
Ink-Treader 2,900 · 14.0%
-
Glint-Eye 505 · 2.4%
- Other (15) 56 · 0.3%
Commanders
Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Cecily, Haunted Mage 14.0% of decks
Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Cecily, Haunted Mage 14.0% of decks
Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder 6.8% of decks
Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder 6.8% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 1.2% of decks
Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix 1.2% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Tana, the Bloodsower 1.5% of decks
Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Tana, the Bloodsower 1.5% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan 1.6% of decks
Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan 1.6% of decks
Most Relevant
Emergent Ultimatum 43.6% of decks
Emergent Ultimatum 43.6% of decks
Cruel Ultimatum 20.6% of decks
Cruel Ultimatum 20.6% of decks
Apex Devastator 60.6% of decks
Apex Devastator 60.6% of decks
Sunbird's Invocation 38.2% of decks
Sunbird's Invocation 38.2% of decks
Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty 54.3% of decks
Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty 54.3% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 43.2% of decks
Etali, Primal Storm 43.2% of decks
That's every commander.
All commanders (5)
- Elmar, Ulvenwald Informant // Cecily, Haunted Mage relevance 1.14 · 14.0% (88 of 628 decks)
- Yidris, Maelstrom Wielder relevance 0.97 · 6.8% (385 of 5,644 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Kydele, Chosen of Kruphix relevance 0.09 · 1.2% (8 of 668 decks)
- Silas Renn, Seeker Adept // Tana, the Bloodsower relevance 0.05 · 1.5% (2 of 135 decks)
- Ludevic, Necro-Alchemist // Reyhan, Last of the Abzan relevance 0.04 · 1.6% (1 of 62 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 1.23 · 43.6% (220 of 505 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 0.77 · 20.6% (104 of 505 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.76 · 60.6% (306 of 505 decks)
- Sunbird's Invocation relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (193 of 505 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.72 · 54.3% (274 of 505 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.72 · 43.2% (218 of 505 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.67 · 45.9% (232 of 505 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.67 · 43.2% (218 of 505 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.67 · 45.9% (232 of 505 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.66 · 41.0% (207 of 505 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.65 · 23.8% (120 of 505 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.64 · 37.0% (187 of 505 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.62 · 34.9% (176 of 505 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.62 · 51.1% (258 of 505 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.61 · 22.2% (112 of 505 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.59 · 34.1% (172 of 505 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.59 · 34.9% (176 of 505 decks)
- Temur Battlecrier relevance 0.57 · 25.5% (129 of 505 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.57 · 37.6% (190 of 505 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 36.6% (185 of 505 decks)
- Fevered Suspicion relevance 0.57 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.56 · 34.3% (173 of 505 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.56 · 32.7% (165 of 505 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.56 · 30.1% (152 of 505 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (145 of 505 decks)
- Bituminous Blast relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (147 of 505 decks)
- Abaddon the Despoiler relevance 0.55 · 34.7% (175 of 505 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.55 · 42.8% (216 of 505 decks)
- Keeper of Secrets relevance 0.54 · 29.5% (149 of 505 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.53 · 35.2% (178 of 505 decks)
All creatures (18)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.76 · 60.6% (306 of 505 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.72 · 54.3% (274 of 505 decks)
- Etali, Primal Storm relevance 0.72 · 43.2% (218 of 505 decks)
- Bloodbraid Elf relevance 0.67 · 43.2% (218 of 505 decks)
- Aurora Phoenix relevance 0.64 · 37.0% (187 of 505 decks)
- Rashmi, Eternities Crafter relevance 0.62 · 34.9% (176 of 505 decks)
- Shardless Agent relevance 0.59 · 34.1% (172 of 505 decks)
- Temur Battlecrier relevance 0.57 · 25.5% (129 of 505 decks)
- Wild-Magic Sorcerer relevance 0.57 · 36.6% (185 of 505 decks)
- Abaddon the Despoiler relevance 0.55 · 34.7% (175 of 505 decks)
- Keeper of Secrets relevance 0.54 · 29.5% (149 of 505 decks)
- Prosper, Tome-Bound relevance 0.53 · 32.5% (164 of 505 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.52 · 27.9% (141 of 505 decks)
- Etali, Primal Conqueror // Etali, Primal Sickness relevance 0.51 · 25.1% (127 of 505 decks)
- Etherium-Horn Sorcerer relevance 0.51 · 26.7% (135 of 505 decks)
- Nalfeshnee relevance 0.51 · 27.1% (137 of 505 decks)
- Quandrix, the Proof relevance 0.49 · 22.2% (112 of 505 decks)
- Annoyed Altisaur relevance 0.48 · 19.4% (98 of 505 decks)
All artifacts (4)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.67 · 45.9% (232 of 505 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.62 · 51.1% (258 of 505 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.57 · 37.6% (190 of 505 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.55 · 42.8% (216 of 505 decks)
All enchantments (5)
- Sunbird's Invocation relevance 0.73 · 38.2% (193 of 505 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.61 · 22.2% (112 of 505 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.59 · 34.9% (176 of 505 decks)
- Temur Ascendancy relevance 0.56 · 28.7% (145 of 505 decks)
- Rhythm of the Wild relevance 0.50 · 21.6% (109 of 505 decks)
All instants (6)
- Counterspell relevance 0.56 · 34.3% (173 of 505 decks)
- Growth Spiral relevance 0.56 · 32.7% (165 of 505 decks)
- Bituminous Blast relevance 0.55 · 29.1% (147 of 505 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.53 · 35.2% (178 of 505 decks)
- Chaos Warp relevance 0.51 · 38.8% (196 of 505 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.48 · 37.8% (191 of 505 decks)
All sorceries (10)
- Emergent Ultimatum relevance 1.23 · 43.6% (220 of 505 decks)
- Cruel Ultimatum relevance 0.77 · 20.6% (104 of 505 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.67 · 45.9% (232 of 505 decks)
- Call Forth the Tempest relevance 0.66 · 41.0% (207 of 505 decks)
- Hit the Mother Lode relevance 0.65 · 23.8% (120 of 505 decks)
- Fevered Suspicion relevance 0.57 · 18.0% (91 of 505 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.56 · 30.1% (152 of 505 decks)
- In Garruk's Wake relevance 0.53 · 22.6% (114 of 505 decks)
- Aminatou's Augury relevance 0.52 · 16.0% (81 of 505 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.50 · 34.3% (173 of 505 decks)
All utility lands (4)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.67 · 43.6% (220 of 505 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.52 · 35.4% (179 of 505 decks)
- Ziatora's Proving Ground relevance 0.50 · 37.6% (190 of 505 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.50 · 28.7% (145 of 505 decks)
All lands (3)
- Frontier Bivouac relevance 0.53 · 36.6% (185 of 505 decks)
- Crumbling Necropolis relevance 0.50 · 32.5% (164 of 505 decks)
- Opulent Palace relevance 0.49 · 32.5% (164 of 505 decks)
EDH data for Genesis Ultimatum: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 505 real decks.
















































