Hard-Hitting Question
Played in 245 Jund decks
Color Identity Spread
4.1% Jund
430+15+5+6+10+11+1+2+
That's every commander.
All commanders (4)
- Maarika, Brutal Gladiator relevance 3.47 · 4.6% (170 of 3,704 decks)
- The Muckslinger Gang relevance 1.45 · 1.2% (28 of 2,405 decks)
- Vial Smasher the Fierce // Halana, Kessig Ranger relevance 0.51 · 6.3% (1 of 16 decks)
- Ikra Shidiqi, the Usurper // Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.33 · 1.6% (1 of 64 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Bushwhack relevance 2.09 · 59.6% (146 of 245 decks)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 1.89 · 47.8% (117 of 245 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 1.87 · 35.9% (88 of 245 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 1.82 · 42.0% (103 of 245 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 1.78 · 31.0% (76 of 245 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 1.74 · 44.5% (109 of 245 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 1.70 · 40.8% (100 of 245 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 1.56 · 23.7% (58 of 245 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 1.47 · 38.0% (93 of 245 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 1.46 · 38.0% (93 of 245 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.46 · 29.8% (73 of 245 decks)
- Gimli's Reckless Might relevance 1.45 · 34.3% (84 of 245 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 1.45 · 26.9% (66 of 245 decks)
- Mr. Orfeo, the Boulder relevance 1.37 · 40.8% (100 of 245 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 1.32 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 1.31 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.30 · 33.9% (83 of 245 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 1.30 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 1.26 · 41.6% (102 of 245 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.23 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Waltz of Rage relevance 1.22 · 22.4% (55 of 245 decks)
- Chevill, Bane of Monsters relevance 1.22 · 26.9% (66 of 245 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus relevance 1.21 · 30.6% (75 of 245 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 1.20 · 18.8% (46 of 245 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 1.19 · 51.4% (126 of 245 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 1.14 · 24.1% (59 of 245 decks)
- General Marhault Elsdragon relevance 1.12 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 1.11 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.10 · 16.7% (41 of 245 decks)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 1.06 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
All creatures (15)
- Neyith of the Dire Hunt relevance 1.89 · 47.8% (117 of 245 decks)
- Ulvenwald Tracker relevance 1.74 · 44.5% (109 of 245 decks)
- Halana and Alena, Partners relevance 1.46 · 38.0% (93 of 245 decks)
- Mr. Orfeo, the Boulder relevance 1.37 · 40.8% (100 of 245 decks)
- Xenagos, God of Revels relevance 1.26 · 41.6% (102 of 245 decks)
- Chevill, Bane of Monsters relevance 1.22 · 26.9% (66 of 245 decks)
- Karlach, Fury of Avernus relevance 1.21 · 30.6% (75 of 245 decks)
- Archetype of Aggression relevance 1.14 · 24.1% (59 of 245 decks)
- General Marhault Elsdragon relevance 1.12 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.03 · 38.8% (95 of 245 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.96 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Kediss, Emberclaw Familiar relevance 0.93 · 20.8% (51 of 245 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.93 · 31.8% (78 of 245 decks)
- Toralf, God of Fury // Toralf's Hammer relevance 0.89 · 17.1% (42 of 245 decks)
- Guardian Augmenter relevance 0.87 · 19.2% (47 of 245 decks)
All artifacts (5)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 1.82 · 42.0% (103 of 245 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 1.32 · 25.3% (62 of 245 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 1.23 · 37.1% (91 of 245 decks)
- Kusari-Gama relevance 0.98 · 17.1% (42 of 245 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.93 · 51.4% (126 of 245 decks)
All enchantments (6)
- Gimli's Reckless Might relevance 1.45 · 34.3% (84 of 245 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 1.31 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Pain for All relevance 1.05 · 29.0% (71 of 245 decks)
- Fight Rigging relevance 0.95 · 19.6% (48 of 245 decks)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 0.89 · 46.5% (114 of 245 decks)
- Bear Umbra relevance 0.87 · 20.0% (49 of 245 decks)
All instants (10)
- Bite Down relevance 1.87 · 35.9% (88 of 245 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 1.78 · 31.0% (76 of 245 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 1.70 · 40.8% (100 of 245 decks)
- Prizefight relevance 1.47 · 38.0% (93 of 245 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 1.30 · 33.9% (83 of 245 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 1.20 · 18.8% (46 of 245 decks)
- Fall of the Hammer relevance 1.10 · 16.7% (41 of 245 decks)
- Pit Fight relevance 0.99 · 20.4% (50 of 245 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.95 · 20.8% (51 of 245 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.92 · 22.0% (54 of 245 decks)
All sorceries (11)
- Bushwhack relevance 2.09 · 59.6% (146 of 245 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 1.56 · 23.7% (58 of 245 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 1.46 · 29.8% (73 of 245 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 1.45 · 26.9% (66 of 245 decks)
- Contest of Claws relevance 1.30 · 27.8% (68 of 245 decks)
- Waltz of Rage relevance 1.22 · 22.4% (55 of 245 decks)
- Chandra's Ignition relevance 1.19 · 51.4% (126 of 245 decks)
- Primal Might relevance 1.11 · 24.5% (60 of 245 decks)
- Spinning Wheel Kick relevance 0.97 · 15.5% (38 of 245 decks)
- Rhino's Rampage relevance 0.96 · 20.0% (49 of 245 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.88 · 31.0% (76 of 245 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Domri, Anarch of Bolas relevance 1.06 · 28.6% (70 of 245 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 1.07 · 33.5% (82 of 245 decks)
- Arena relevance 0.92 · 18.4% (45 of 245 decks)
EDH data for Hard-Hitting Question: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 245 real decks.























































