Thrumming Hivepool
Played in 1,675 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
7.1% Simic
- Five-Color 17,587 · 74.3%
- Simic 1,675 · 7.1%
- Selesnya 881 · 3.7%
- Colorless 496 · 2.1%
- Other (28) 3,039 · 12.8%
Commanders
Most Relevant
All commanders (7)
- Omo, Queen of Vesuva relevance 4.50 · 19.3% (1,379 of 7,127 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Volo, Itinerant Scholar relevance 3.19 · 37.1% (72 of 194 decks)
- Moritte of the Frost relevance 2.66 · 14.8% (101 of 681 decks)
- Volo, Itinerant Scholar // Cloakwood Hermit relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- The Sixth Doctor // Adric, Mathematical Genius relevance 0.21 · 3.0% (1 of 33 decks)
- Acolyte of Bahamut // Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.21 · 2.9% (1 of 35 decks)
- Malcolm, Keen-Eyed Navigator // Ich-Tekik, Salvage Splicer relevance 0.16 · 1.8% (1 of 57 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 3.01 · 75.6% (1,266 of 1,675 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 2.30 · 49.0% (821 of 1,675 decks)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 2.28 · 59.8% (1,001 of 1,675 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 2.22 · 47.3% (792 of 1,675 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 2.22 · 46.9% (785 of 1,675 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 2.17 · 60.7% (1,016 of 1,675 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.12 · 46.3% (776 of 1,675 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 2.08 · 43.1% (722 of 1,675 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.07 · 44.1% (738 of 1,675 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.99 · 53.9% (903 of 1,675 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.94 · 44.1% (738 of 1,675 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.91 · 44.0% (737 of 1,675 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.87 · 36.2% (606 of 1,675 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.74 · 57.0% (955 of 1,675 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 1.72 · 32.8% (550 of 1,675 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.70 · 55.6% (932 of 1,675 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 1.62 · 32.2% (539 of 1,675 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 1.62 · 31.9% (534 of 1,675 decks)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.58 · 43.2% (724 of 1,675 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.54 · 49.1% (822 of 1,675 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.53 · 30.3% (507 of 1,675 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.53 · 41.2% (690 of 1,675 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.52 · 28.4% (476 of 1,675 decks)
- Shifting Sliver relevance 1.50 · 28.0% (469 of 1,675 decks)
- Descendants' Path relevance 1.44 · 30.5% (511 of 1,675 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.43 · 34.6% (580 of 1,675 decks)
- Full Moon's Rise relevance 1.41 · 24.8% (416 of 1,675 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.37 · 55.2% (924 of 1,675 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 1.36 · 26.4% (443 of 1,675 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 1.34 · 24.1% (403 of 1,675 decks)
All creatures (23)
- Lord of the Unreal relevance 3.01 · 75.6% (1,266 of 1,675 decks)
- Baru, Wurmspeaker relevance 2.30 · 49.0% (821 of 1,675 decks)
- Galerider Sliver relevance 2.22 · 47.3% (792 of 1,675 decks)
- Feline Sovereign relevance 2.22 · 46.9% (785 of 1,675 decks)
- Hakbal of the Surging Soul relevance 2.17 · 60.7% (1,016 of 1,675 decks)
- Timber Protector relevance 2.12 · 46.3% (776 of 1,675 decks)
- Herald of Hoofbeats relevance 2.07 · 44.1% (738 of 1,675 decks)
- Sage of the Maze relevance 1.99 · 53.9% (903 of 1,675 decks)
- Aven Courier relevance 1.94 · 44.1% (738 of 1,675 decks)
- Azami, Lady of Scrolls relevance 1.91 · 44.0% (737 of 1,675 decks)
- Pheres-Band Warchief relevance 1.87 · 36.2% (606 of 1,675 decks)
- Priest of Titania relevance 1.74 · 57.0% (955 of 1,675 decks)
- Diffusion Sliver relevance 1.72 · 32.8% (550 of 1,675 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 1.70 · 55.6% (932 of 1,675 decks)
- Sea Gate Loremaster relevance 1.62 · 32.2% (539 of 1,675 decks)
- Harabaz Druid relevance 1.62 · 31.9% (534 of 1,675 decks)
- Scion of Oona relevance 1.53 · 30.3% (507 of 1,675 decks)
- Magus of the Candelabra relevance 1.53 · 41.2% (690 of 1,675 decks)
- Sunderflock relevance 1.52 · 28.4% (476 of 1,675 decks)
- Shifting Sliver relevance 1.50 · 28.0% (469 of 1,675 decks)
- Seshiro the Anointed relevance 1.36 · 26.4% (443 of 1,675 decks)
- Cyclone Summoner relevance 1.29 · 26.8% (449 of 1,675 decks)
- Gemhide Sliver relevance 1.28 · 24.1% (403 of 1,675 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Maskwood Nexus relevance 2.28 · 59.8% (1,001 of 1,675 decks)
- Multiclass Baldric relevance 2.08 · 43.1% (722 of 1,675 decks)
- Expedition Map relevance 1.31 · 39.6% (664 of 1,675 decks)
All enchantments (3)
- Descendants' Path relevance 1.44 · 30.5% (511 of 1,675 decks)
- Full Moon's Rise relevance 1.41 · 24.8% (416 of 1,675 decks)
- Copy Land relevance 1.31 · 33.9% (568 of 1,675 decks)
All instants (1)
- Absorb Identity relevance 1.28 · 24.3% (407 of 1,675 decks)
All sorceries (5)
- Hour of Promise relevance 1.58 · 43.2% (724 of 1,675 decks)
- Sylvan Scrying relevance 1.54 · 49.1% (822 of 1,675 decks)
- March from Velis Vel relevance 1.43 · 34.6% (580 of 1,675 decks)
- Whelming Wave relevance 1.37 · 55.2% (924 of 1,675 decks)
- Mass Appeal relevance 1.34 · 24.1% (403 of 1,675 decks)
All utility lands (6)
- Swarmyard relevance 2.21 · 49.0% (820 of 1,675 decks)
- Basilisk Gate relevance 2.15 · 59.9% (1,004 of 1,675 decks)
- Maze's End relevance 2.08 · 53.4% (895 of 1,675 decks)
- Thespian's Stage relevance 1.85 · 62.9% (1,054 of 1,675 decks)
- Trenchpost relevance 1.40 · 35.8% (600 of 1,675 decks)
- Talon Gates of Madara relevance 1.33 · 46.5% (779 of 1,675 decks)
All lands (9)
- Cloudpost relevance 2.66 · 76.1% (1,275 of 1,675 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 2.45 · 75.9% (1,271 of 1,675 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 2.41 · 74.3% (1,244 of 1,675 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 2.41 · 74.2% (1,243 of 1,675 decks)
- Baldur's Gate relevance 2.37 · 61.6% (1,032 of 1,675 decks)
- Vesuva relevance 1.98 · 63.6% (1,066 of 1,675 decks)
- Planar Nexus relevance 1.95 · 55.1% (923 of 1,675 decks)
- Glimmerpost relevance 1.90 · 50.8% (851 of 1,675 decks)
- Dark Depths relevance 1.48 · 49.6% (831 of 1,675 decks)
EDH data for Thrumming Hivepool: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 1,675 real decks.