Ecologist's Terrarium
Played in 80 Dimir decks
Color Identity Spread
2.4% Dimir
- Azorius 233 · 7.0%
- Colorless 212 · 6.4%
- Boros 196 · 5.9%
- Red 189 · 5.7%
- Blue 174 · 5.3%
- Naya 168 · 5.1%
- White 158 · 4.8%
- Five-Color 136 · 4.1%
- Black 133 · 4.0%
- Izzet 131 · 4.0%
- Gruul 127 · 3.8%
- Green 125 · 3.8%
- Orzhov 122 · 3.7%
- Esper 121 · 3.7%
- Mardu 119 · 3.6%
- Rakdos 118 · 3.6%
- Golgari 111 · 3.3%
- Selesnya 106 · 3.2%
- Simic 106 · 3.2%
- Dimir 80 · 2.4%
- Grixis 77 · 2.3%
- Sultai 72 · 2.2%
- Other (10) 300 · 9.1%
All commanders (2)
- Armix, Filigree Thrasher // Glacian, Powerstone Engineer relevance 1.03 · 5.3% (2 of 38 decks)
- Sarevok, Deathbringer // Clan Crafter relevance 0.50 · 1.7% (1 of 60 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Mukotai Ambusher relevance 1.94 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Shadow-Walker relevance 1.81 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Debt to the Kami relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 1.70 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Network Terminal relevance 1.60 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Assassin's Ink relevance 1.57 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Clawing Torment relevance 1.56 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 1.53 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Futurist Operative relevance 1.52 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 1.52 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Kaito's Pursuit relevance 1.47 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Nezumi Prowler relevance 1.45 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Inkrise Infiltrator relevance 1.43 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 1.41 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 1.39 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Return to Action relevance 1.33 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Compleation relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Kami of Restless Shadows relevance 1.25 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 1.12 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Biting-Palm Ninja relevance 1.12 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 1.12 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Nezumi Bladeblesser relevance 1.09 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Mnemonic Sphere relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 1.07 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Kotose, the Silent Spider relevance 1.06 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 1.01 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- The Long Reach of Night // Animus of Night's Reach relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 1.00 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Soul Transfer relevance 0.97 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Invoke Despair relevance 0.92 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All creatures (27)
- Mukotai Ambusher relevance 1.94 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Shadow-Walker relevance 1.81 · 35.0% (28 of 80 decks)
- Covert Technician relevance 1.70 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Futurist Operative relevance 1.52 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Nezumi Prowler relevance 1.45 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Inkrise Infiltrator relevance 1.43 · 31.3% (25 of 80 decks)
- Moonsnare Specialist relevance 1.41 · 38.8% (31 of 80 decks)
- Kami of Restless Shadows relevance 1.25 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
- Dokuchi Silencer relevance 1.12 · 32.5% (26 of 80 decks)
- Biting-Palm Ninja relevance 1.12 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Silver-Fur Master relevance 1.12 · 47.5% (38 of 80 decks)
- Nezumi Bladeblesser relevance 1.09 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 1.07 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Kotose, the Silent Spider relevance 1.06 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
- Prosperous Thief relevance 1.01 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
- The Long Reach of Night // Animus of Night's Reach relevance 1.00 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Moon-Circuit Hacker relevance 1.00 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Thousand-Faced Shadow relevance 0.90 · 37.5% (30 of 80 decks)
- Acquisition Octopus relevance 0.89 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
- Behold the Unspeakable // Vision of the Unspeakable relevance 0.86 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- The Modern Age // Vector Glider relevance 0.85 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Inventive Iteration // Living Breakthrough relevance 0.82 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- The Reality Chip relevance 0.74 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
- Phantom Ninja relevance 0.73 · 17.5% (14 of 80 decks)
- Nashi, Moon Sage's Scion relevance 0.71 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Ninja of the New Moon relevance 0.69 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Ink-Eyes, Servant of Oni relevance 0.66 · 21.3% (17 of 80 decks)
All artifacts (3)
- Network Terminal relevance 1.60 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Mnemonic Sphere relevance 1.08 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Ninja's Kunai relevance 0.86 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Clawing Torment relevance 1.56 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Tamiyo's Compleation relevance 1.27 · 18.8% (15 of 80 decks)
All instants (9)
- Debt to the Kami relevance 1.70 · 27.5% (22 of 80 decks)
- Assassin's Ink relevance 1.57 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- You Are Already Dead relevance 1.53 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 1.52 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 1.39 · 26.3% (21 of 80 decks)
- Return to Action relevance 1.33 · 23.8% (19 of 80 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.91 · 25.0% (20 of 80 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.85 · 30.0% (24 of 80 decks)
- Reckoner's Bargain relevance 0.81 · 13.8% (11 of 80 decks)
All sorceries (3)
- Kaito's Pursuit relevance 1.47 · 28.7% (23 of 80 decks)
- Soul Transfer relevance 0.97 · 16.3% (13 of 80 decks)
- Invoke Despair relevance 0.92 · 15.0% (12 of 80 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kaito Shizuki relevance 0.76 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Roadside Reliquary relevance 0.83 · 12.5% (10 of 80 decks)
- Waterfront District relevance 0.76 · 20.0% (16 of 80 decks)
All lands (3)
- Dismal Backwater relevance 1.33 · 67.5% (54 of 80 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 1.14 · 22.5% (18 of 80 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.83 · 42.5% (34 of 80 decks)
EDH data for Ecologist's Terrarium: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 80 real decks.