Miren, the Moaning Well
Played in 204 Simic decks
Color Identity Spread
2.1% Simic
- Colorless 1,026 · 10.8%
- Abzan 803 · 8.5%
- Black 799 · 8.4%
- Golgari 765 · 8.1%
- Green 742 · 7.8%
- White 630 · 6.6%
- Orzhov 512 · 5.4%
- Five-Color 467 · 4.9%
- Rakdos 322 · 3.4%
- Selesnya 309 · 3.3%
- Red 291 · 3.1%
- Boros 280 · 3.0%
- Naya 268 · 2.8%
- Grixis 261 · 2.8%
- Jund 224 · 2.4%
- Azorius 214 · 2.3%
- Simic 204 · 2.1%
- Sultai 201 · 2.1%
- Bant 190 · 2.0%
- Other (13) 982 · 10.3%
All commanders (3)
- The Pride of Hull Clade relevance 3.67 · 6.9% (89 of 1,281 decks)
- Graham O'Brien // The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.52 · 4.8% (1 of 21 decks)
- The Fourth Doctor relevance 0.48 · 3.4% (1 of 29 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Assault Formation relevance 2.18 · 41.2% (84 of 204 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 2.03 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.00 · 35.8% (73 of 204 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.94 · 35.3% (72 of 204 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.87 · 37.7% (77 of 204 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.60 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 1.59 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.47 · 37.3% (76 of 204 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 1.45 · 25.5% (52 of 204 decks)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.39 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.34 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 1.33 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.33 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 1.32 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.29 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.28 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.27 · 27.0% (55 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 1.27 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.24 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.19 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.17 · 28.4% (58 of 204 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 1.14 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Geralf, Visionary Stitcher relevance 1.13 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.11 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.09 · 29.4% (60 of 204 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 1.07 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 1.06 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.05 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
All creatures (35)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 2.03 · 40.2% (82 of 204 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 2.00 · 35.8% (73 of 204 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 1.94 · 35.3% (72 of 204 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.87 · 37.7% (77 of 204 decks)
- Caelorna, Coral Tyrant relevance 1.60 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Arbor Adherent relevance 1.59 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Charix, the Raging Isle relevance 1.47 · 37.3% (76 of 204 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 1.45 · 25.5% (52 of 204 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 1.34 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Suspicious Bookcase relevance 1.33 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.33 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.29 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Shield Sphere relevance 1.28 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 1.27 · 27.0% (55 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Roots relevance 1.27 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Hover Barrier relevance 1.24 · 21.1% (43 of 204 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.19 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.17 · 28.4% (58 of 204 decks)
- Fecund Greenshell relevance 1.15 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Geralf, Visionary Stitcher relevance 1.13 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Aegis Turtle relevance 1.11 · 21.6% (44 of 204 decks)
- Psychosis Crawler relevance 1.07 · 30.9% (63 of 204 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 1.05 · 18.1% (37 of 204 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.01 · 16.2% (33 of 204 decks)
- Tetsuko Umezawa, Fugitive relevance 0.99 · 20.6% (42 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Frost relevance 0.97 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 0.88 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Rampart Architect relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Biomancer's Familiar relevance 0.85 · 25.0% (51 of 204 decks)
- Riptide Turtle relevance 0.84 · 14.2% (29 of 204 decks)
- Tapestry Warden relevance 0.83 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 0.81 · 12.7% (26 of 204 decks)
- Corrupted Shapeshifter relevance 0.79 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Wall of Runes relevance 0.78 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
- Zopandrel, Hunger Dominus relevance 0.75 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
All artifacts (2)
- Tangleweave Armor relevance 1.14 · 18.6% (38 of 204 decks)
- Meekstone relevance 0.96 · 15.2% (31 of 204 decks)
All enchantments (4)
- Assault Formation relevance 2.18 · 41.2% (84 of 204 decks)
- Treefolk Umbra relevance 1.32 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 1.06 · 32.4% (66 of 204 decks)
- Feed the Pack relevance 0.89 · 13.7% (28 of 204 decks)
All instants (3)
- Sheltering Word relevance 1.39 · 23.5% (48 of 204 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.88 · 16.7% (34 of 204 decks)
- Tower Defense relevance 0.80 · 13.2% (27 of 204 decks)
All sorceries (4)
- Last March of the Ents relevance 1.09 · 29.4% (60 of 204 decks)
- Majestic Genesis relevance 0.95 · 17.2% (35 of 204 decks)
- Artful Dodge relevance 0.87 · 15.7% (32 of 204 decks)
- Metamorphosis relevance 0.74 · 11.3% (23 of 204 decks)
All utility lands (2)
- Cactus Preserve relevance 1.17 · 23.0% (47 of 204 decks)
- Access Tunnel relevance 1.14 · 24.0% (49 of 204 decks)
EDH data for Miren, the Moaning Well: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 204 real decks.