Aggressive Mammoth
Played in 563 Bant decks
Color Identity Spread
3.9% Bant
All commanders (8)
- Helga, Skittish Seer relevance 2.37 · 2.4% (298 of 12,271 decks)
- Mr. Foxglove relevance 1.37 · 1.6% (51 of 3,190 decks)
- Ellie and Alan, Paleontologists relevance 0.98 · 1.4% (20 of 1,462 decks)
- Leela, Sevateem Warrior // The Fifth Doctor relevance 0.82 · 15.4% (2 of 13 decks)
- Arcades Sabboth relevance 0.58 · 2.4% (3 of 124 decks)
- Jedit Ojanen, Mercenary relevance 0.52 · 1.1% (5 of 457 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Gilanra, Caller of Wirewood relevance 0.38 · 5.3% (1 of 19 decks)
- Ishai, Ojutai Dragonspeaker // Anara, Wolvid Familiar relevance 0.23 · 1.4% (1 of 72 decks)
All most relevant (30)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.11 · 43.2% (243 of 563 decks)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.02 · 29.7% (167 of 563 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.99 · 28.1% (158 of 563 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.66 · 23.6% (133 of 563 decks)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (113 of 563 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (83 of 563 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.63 · 18.1% (102 of 563 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (109 of 563 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (74 of 563 decks)
- Shore Up relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (81 of 563 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (103 of 563 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (80 of 563 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.56 · 17.2% (97 of 563 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.55 · 29.7% (167 of 563 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (110 of 563 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (87 of 563 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (80 of 563 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.52 · 21.1% (119 of 563 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (57 of 563 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.51 · 21.1% (119 of 563 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (73 of 563 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 23.6% (133 of 563 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (59 of 563 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (76 of 563 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (73 of 563 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (77 of 563 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (40 of 563 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (52 of 563 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.44 · 17.4% (98 of 563 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (52 of 563 decks)
All creatures (36)
- Goreclaw, Terror of Qal Sisma relevance 1.02 · 29.7% (167 of 563 decks)
- Ghalta, Primal Hunger relevance 0.99 · 28.1% (158 of 563 decks)
- Shalai, Voice of Plenty relevance 0.66 · 23.6% (133 of 563 decks)
- Wildwood Scourge relevance 0.64 · 14.7% (83 of 563 decks)
- Koma, World-Eater relevance 0.63 · 18.1% (102 of 563 decks)
- Hydroid Krasis relevance 0.61 · 19.4% (109 of 563 decks)
- End-Raze Forerunners relevance 0.58 · 13.1% (74 of 563 decks)
- Kiora's Follower relevance 0.56 · 18.3% (103 of 563 decks)
- Thryx, the Sudden Storm relevance 0.56 · 14.2% (80 of 563 decks)
- Apex Devastator relevance 0.56 · 17.2% (97 of 563 decks)
- Llanowar Elves relevance 0.55 · 29.7% (167 of 563 decks)
- Inga and Esika relevance 0.55 · 19.5% (110 of 563 decks)
- Ghalta and Mavren relevance 0.55 · 15.5% (87 of 563 decks)
- Silverback Elder relevance 0.52 · 14.2% (80 of 563 decks)
- Beast Whisperer relevance 0.52 · 21.1% (119 of 563 decks)
- Garruk's Packleader relevance 0.51 · 10.1% (57 of 563 decks)
- Chulane, Teller of Tales relevance 0.51 · 21.1% (119 of 563 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.50 · 13.0% (73 of 563 decks)
- Terastodon relevance 0.48 · 10.5% (59 of 563 decks)
- Saryth, the Viper's Fang relevance 0.46 · 13.5% (76 of 563 decks)
- Chakram Retriever relevance 0.46 · 13.7% (77 of 563 decks)
- Giant Ankheg relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (40 of 563 decks)
- Archetype of Endurance relevance 0.45 · 9.2% (52 of 563 decks)
- Craterhoof Behemoth relevance 0.44 · 17.4% (98 of 563 decks)
- Jumbo Cactuar relevance 0.44 · 9.2% (52 of 563 decks)
- Zetalpa, Primal Dawn relevance 0.43 · 9.2% (52 of 563 decks)
- The Goose Mother relevance 0.43 · 14.0% (79 of 563 decks)
- Genesis Hydra relevance 0.42 · 9.8% (55 of 563 decks)
- Quilled Greatwurm relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (53 of 563 decks)
- Imoti, Celebrant of Bounty relevance 0.41 · 11.5% (65 of 563 decks)
- Hullbreaker Horror relevance 0.40 · 13.9% (78 of 563 decks)
- Storvald, Frost Giant Jarl relevance 0.40 · 9.8% (55 of 563 decks)
- Hungering Hydra relevance 0.40 · 7.6% (43 of 563 decks)
- Tanufel Rimespeaker relevance 0.39 · 7.6% (43 of 563 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.39 · 26.3% (148 of 563 decks)
- Fanatic of Rhonas relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (61 of 563 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.41 · 24.0% (135 of 563 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Garruk's Uprising relevance 1.11 · 43.2% (243 of 563 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.39 · 16.7% (94 of 563 decks)
All instants (3)
- Shore Up relevance 0.57 · 14.4% (81 of 563 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.50 · 23.6% (133 of 563 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (73 of 563 decks)
All sorceries (2)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.42 · 26.1% (147 of 563 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (60 of 563 decks)
All planeswalkers (1)
- Kiora, Behemoth Beckoner relevance 0.65 · 20.1% (113 of 563 decks)
All utility lands (1)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.46 · 21.5% (121 of 563 decks)
All lands (4)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.60 · 19.5% (110 of 563 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.54 · 17.6% (99 of 563 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.51 · 16.2% (91 of 563 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.43 · 30.4% (171 of 563 decks)
EDH data for Aggressive Mammoth: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 563 real decks.