Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination
Played in 103 Abzan decks
Color Identity Spread
3.4% Abzan
All most relevant (30)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.68 · 43.7% (45 of 103 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.43 · 67.0% (69 of 103 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.27 · 55.3% (57 of 103 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 1.27 · 65.0% (67 of 103 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.17 · 60.2% (62 of 103 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.13 · 52.4% (54 of 103 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.13 · 60.2% (62 of 103 decks)
- Blight Pile relevance 1.12 · 36.9% (38 of 103 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.10 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Guardians of Meletis relevance 1.06 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.06 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Flumph relevance 1.05 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.05 · 21.4% (22 of 103 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.03 · 46.6% (48 of 103 decks)
- Archers' Parapet relevance 1.02 · 19.4% (20 of 103 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.01 · 26.2% (27 of 103 decks)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.96 · 53.4% (55 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 0.95 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Doran, Besieged by Time relevance 0.93 · 38.8% (40 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.92 · 44.7% (46 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.91 · 43.7% (45 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 0.91 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 0.89 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Souls of the Faultless relevance 0.89 · 16.5% (17 of 103 decks)
- Dazzling Ramparts relevance 0.86 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Catapult Fodder // Catapult Captain relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Barrier of Bones relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Consulate Skygate relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Gleaming Barrier relevance 0.85 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
All creatures (47)
- Vine Trellis relevance 1.68 · 43.7% (45 of 103 decks)
- Overgrown Battlement relevance 1.43 · 67.0% (69 of 103 decks)
- Axebane Guardian relevance 1.27 · 55.3% (57 of 103 decks)
- Tree of Perdition relevance 1.27 · 65.0% (67 of 103 decks)
- Tree of Redemption relevance 1.17 · 60.2% (62 of 103 decks)
- The Walls of Ba Sing Se relevance 1.13 · 52.4% (54 of 103 decks)
- Sylvan Caryatid relevance 1.13 · 60.2% (62 of 103 decks)
- Blight Pile relevance 1.12 · 36.9% (38 of 103 decks)
- Stalwart Shield-Bearers relevance 1.10 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Guardians of Meletis relevance 1.06 · 18.4% (19 of 103 decks)
- Fortified Rampart relevance 1.06 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Flumph relevance 1.05 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Angelic Wall relevance 1.05 · 21.4% (22 of 103 decks)
- Crystal Barricade relevance 1.03 · 46.6% (48 of 103 decks)
- Archers' Parapet relevance 1.02 · 19.4% (20 of 103 decks)
- Shield-Wall Sentinel relevance 1.01 · 26.2% (27 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Junk relevance 0.95 · 24.3% (25 of 103 decks)
- Perimeter Captain relevance 0.95 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Doran, Besieged by Time relevance 0.93 · 38.8% (40 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Blossoms relevance 0.92 · 44.7% (46 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Omens relevance 0.91 · 43.7% (45 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Tanglecord relevance 0.91 · 23.3% (24 of 103 decks)
- Walking Bulwark relevance 0.89 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Souls of the Faultless relevance 0.89 · 16.5% (17 of 103 decks)
- Dazzling Ramparts relevance 0.86 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Catapult Fodder // Catapult Captain relevance 0.85 · 27.2% (28 of 103 decks)
- Barrier of Bones relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Consulate Skygate relevance 0.85 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Gleaming Barrier relevance 0.85 · 17.5% (18 of 103 decks)
- Crashing Drawbridge relevance 0.83 · 40.8% (42 of 103 decks)
- Rampart Architect relevance 0.83 · 35.0% (36 of 103 decks)
- Wall of Essence relevance 0.82 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
- Sunscape Familiar relevance 0.82 · 13.6% (14 of 103 decks)
- Great Forest Druid relevance 0.79 · 35.9% (37 of 103 decks)
- Wingmantle Chaplain relevance 0.79 · 25.2% (26 of 103 decks)
- Felothar the Steadfast relevance 0.78 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Amaranthine Wall relevance 0.78 · 14.6% (15 of 103 decks)
- Bedrock Tortoise relevance 0.77 · 37.9% (39 of 103 decks)
- Junktroller relevance 0.77 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Carven Caryatid relevance 0.76 · 28.2% (29 of 103 decks)
- Weathered Sentinels relevance 0.75 · 35.0% (36 of 103 decks)
- Towering Titan relevance 0.75 · 31.1% (32 of 103 decks)
- Saruli Caretaker relevance 0.75 · 12.6% (13 of 103 decks)
- Pit Automaton relevance 0.73 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
- Doran, the Siege Tower relevance 0.71 · 33.0% (34 of 103 decks)
- Wild-Field Scarecrow relevance 0.71 · 10.7% (11 of 103 decks)
- Giant Ox relevance 0.70 · 15.5% (16 of 103 decks)
All artifacts (1)
- Warmonger's Chariot relevance 0.71 · 11.7% (12 of 103 decks)
All enchantments (2)
- Assault Formation relevance 0.96 · 53.4% (55 of 103 decks)
- Jaws of Defeat relevance 0.76 · 41.7% (43 of 103 decks)
EDH data for Ulvenwald Captive // Ulvenwald Abomination: adoption stats, associated cards, and its most popular commanders, from 103 real decks.