Commanders like Chatzuk, Mighty Guitarist
5 commanders · based on 512 decks
Similar commanders
Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 0.49 · 30.1% (154 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skycaptain relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (153 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 0.45 · 35.5% (182 of 512 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (178 of 512 decks)
- War Elephant relevance 0.44 · 30.9% (158 of 512 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 0.44 · 39.1% (200 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 0.43 · 27.9% (143 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 0.43 · 30.7% (157 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 0.40 · 38.5% (197 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Phalanx relevance 0.48 · 26.4% (135 of 512 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 0.38 · 38.5% (197 of 512 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 0.48 · 27.5% (141 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Phalanx relevance 0.47 · 22.3% (114 of 512 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 0.46 · 30.3% (155 of 512 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 0.37 · 41.0% (210 of 512 decks)
- Cooperation relevance 0.37 · 25.8% (132 of 512 decks)
- Knights of Thorn relevance 0.45 · 26.0% (133 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 0.44 · 36.7% (188 of 512 decks)
- Jangling Automaton relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (103 of 512 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 0.42 · 35.4% (181 of 512 decks)
- Nature's Blessing relevance 0.41 · 17.0% (87 of 512 decks)
- Deftblade Elite relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (70 of 512 decks)
- Formation relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (118 of 512 decks)
- Errand of Duty relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (108 of 512 decks)
- Abu Ja'far relevance 0.32 · 22.5% (115 of 512 decks)
- Camel relevance 0.39 · 18.6% (95 of 512 decks)
- Urza's Engine relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (96 of 512 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 0.28 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Sylvan Basilisk relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (82 of 512 decks)
- Wall of Shields relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (84 of 512 decks)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 0.26 · 41.8% (214 of 512 decks)
- Battering Ram relevance 0.31 · 18.9% (97 of 512 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 0.25 · 32.2% (165 of 512 decks)
- Indrik Umbra relevance 0.41 · 23.2% (119 of 512 decks)
- Elven Warhounds relevance 0.39 · 18.4% (94 of 512 decks)
- Timber Wolves relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.30 · 17.8% (91 of 512 decks)
- Tempting Licid relevance 0.30 · 22.5% (115 of 512 decks)
- Serra's Blessing relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (69 of 512 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (86 of 512 decks)
- Odric, Master Tactician relevance 0.17 · 26.8% (137 of 512 decks)
- Shinen of Life's Roar relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (81 of 512 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.26 · 17.0% (87 of 512 decks)
- Shielded by Faith relevance 0.16 · 14.5% (74 of 512 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 0.15 · 14.6% (75 of 512 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (88 of 512 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.14 · 19.3% (99 of 512 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.23 · 30.5% (156 of 512 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.23 · 20.7% (106 of 512 decks)
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Kjeldoran Escort relevance 0.49 · 30.1% (154 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skycaptain relevance 0.48 · 29.9% (153 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Skirmishers relevance 0.45 · 35.5% (182 of 512 decks)
- Benalish Infantry relevance 0.45 · 34.8% (178 of 512 decks)
- War Elephant relevance 0.44 · 30.9% (158 of 512 decks)
- Pikemen relevance 0.44 · 39.1% (200 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Infantry relevance 0.43 · 27.9% (143 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Knight relevance 0.43 · 30.7% (157 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Warrior relevance 0.40 · 38.5% (197 of 512 decks)
- Icatian Phalanx relevance 0.48 · 26.4% (135 of 512 decks)
- Mesa Pegasus relevance 0.38 · 38.5% (197 of 512 decks)
- Teremko Griffin relevance 0.48 · 27.5% (141 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Phalanx relevance 0.47 · 22.3% (114 of 512 decks)
- Noble Elephant relevance 0.46 · 30.3% (155 of 512 decks)
- Benalish Hero relevance 0.37 · 41.0% (210 of 512 decks)
- Knights of Thorn relevance 0.45 · 26.0% (133 of 512 decks)
- Kjeldoran Skyknight relevance 0.44 · 36.7% (188 of 512 decks)
- Jangling Automaton relevance 0.43 · 20.1% (103 of 512 decks)
- Shield Bearer relevance 0.42 · 35.4% (181 of 512 decks)
- Deftblade Elite relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (70 of 512 decks)
- Abu Ja'far relevance 0.32 · 22.5% (115 of 512 decks)
- Camel relevance 0.39 · 18.6% (95 of 512 decks)
- Urza's Engine relevance 0.37 · 18.8% (96 of 512 decks)
- Cho-Manno, Revolutionary relevance 0.28 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Sylvan Basilisk relevance 0.45 · 16.0% (82 of 512 decks)
- Wall of Shields relevance 0.33 · 16.4% (84 of 512 decks)
- Battering Ram relevance 0.31 · 18.9% (97 of 512 decks)
- Elven Warhounds relevance 0.39 · 18.4% (94 of 512 decks)
- Timber Wolves relevance 0.35 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Tempting Licid relevance 0.30 · 22.5% (115 of 512 decks)
- Noble Quarry relevance 0.28 · 16.8% (86 of 512 decks)
- Odric, Master Tactician relevance 0.17 · 26.8% (137 of 512 decks)
- Shinen of Life's Roar relevance 0.27 · 15.8% (81 of 512 decks)
- Phyrexian Vindicator relevance 0.15 · 14.6% (75 of 512 decks)
- Engulfing Slagwurm relevance 0.25 · 17.2% (88 of 512 decks)
- Saprazzan Heir relevance 0.34 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Tolarian Entrancer relevance 0.33 · 12.9% (66 of 512 decks)
- Mentor of the Meek relevance 0.12 · 14.1% (72 of 512 decks)
- Avacyn's Pilgrim relevance 0.19 · 12.9% (66 of 512 decks)
- Satyr Enchanter relevance 0.28 · 16.0% (82 of 512 decks)
- Sram, Senior Edificer relevance 0.14 · 17.8% (91 of 512 decks)
- Welcoming Vampire relevance 0.11 · 10.4% (53 of 512 decks)
- Sun Titan relevance 0.10 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Mother of Runes relevance 0.10 · 13.3% (68 of 512 decks)
- Odric, Lunarch Marshal relevance 0.12 · 11.1% (57 of 512 decks)
- Sythis, Harvest's Hand relevance 0.25 · 13.9% (71 of 512 decks)
- Danitha Capashen, Paragon relevance 0.14 · 12.7% (65 of 512 decks)
- Esper Sentinel relevance 0.08 · 13.9% (71 of 512 decks)
- Kor Spiritdancer relevance 0.20 · 12.9% (66 of 512 decks)
- Setessan Champion relevance 0.17 · 15.0% (77 of 512 decks)
Artifacts
12
Artifacts
12 Showing 1-10 of 12
Page size
All artifacts (12)
- Helm of Chatzuk relevance 0.26 · 41.8% (214 of 512 decks)
- Baton of Morale relevance 0.25 · 32.2% (165 of 512 decks)
- Nemesis Mask relevance 0.12 · 29.7% (152 of 512 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.11 · 11.7% (60 of 512 decks)
- Pearl Medallion relevance 0.09 · 11.3% (58 of 512 decks)
- Infiltration Lens relevance 0.06 · 31.6% (162 of 512 decks)
- Mirror Shield relevance 0.04 · 12.9% (66 of 512 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.00 · 11.5% (59 of 512 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.00 · 19.1% (98 of 512 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.00 · 12.5% (64 of 512 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.00 · 68.8% (352 of 512 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.00 · 47.9% (245 of 512 decks)
Enchantments
24
Enchantments
24 Showing 1-10 of 24
Page size
All enchantments (24)
- Cooperation relevance 0.37 · 25.8% (132 of 512 decks)
- Nature's Blessing relevance 0.41 · 17.0% (87 of 512 decks)
- Indrik Umbra relevance 0.41 · 23.2% (119 of 512 decks)
- Seton's Desire relevance 0.30 · 17.8% (91 of 512 decks)
- Serra's Blessing relevance 0.18 · 13.5% (69 of 512 decks)
- Glorious Anthem relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Shielded by Faith relevance 0.16 · 14.5% (74 of 512 decks)
- Brave the Sands relevance 0.14 · 19.3% (99 of 512 decks)
- Lure relevance 0.23 · 30.5% (156 of 512 decks)
- Reconnaissance relevance 0.12 · 14.3% (73 of 512 decks)
- Always Watching relevance 0.15 · 10.5% (54 of 512 decks)
- Dragon Fangs relevance 0.26 · 13.1% (67 of 512 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.10 · 15.0% (77 of 512 decks)
- Wild Growth relevance 0.12 · 27.0% (138 of 512 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.09 · 12.5% (64 of 512 decks)
- Fertile Ground relevance 0.13 · 21.3% (109 of 512 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.12 · 10.2% (52 of 512 decks)
- Kenrith's Transformation relevance 0.12 · 13.3% (68 of 512 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.07 · 10.4% (53 of 512 decks)
- Utopia Sprawl relevance 0.10 · 12.1% (62 of 512 decks)
- Overgrowth relevance 0.15 · 17.2% (88 of 512 decks)
- Unflinching Courage relevance 0.29 · 14.3% (73 of 512 decks)
- Armadillo Cloak relevance 0.27 · 11.7% (60 of 512 decks)
- Wolfwillow Haven relevance 0.15 · 11.3% (58 of 512 decks)
Instants
17
Instants
17 Showing 1-10 of 17
Page size
All instants (17)
- Formation relevance 0.40 · 23.0% (118 of 512 decks)
- Errand of Duty relevance 0.40 · 21.1% (108 of 512 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.12 · 14.6% (75 of 512 decks)
- Dawn Charm relevance 0.12 · 12.9% (66 of 512 decks)
- Benefactor's Draught relevance 0.16 · 13.5% (69 of 512 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (57 of 512 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.09 · 22.9% (117 of 512 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.08 · 11.1% (57 of 512 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.08 · 37.5% (192 of 512 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.08 · 55.1% (282 of 512 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (56 of 512 decks)
- Mercy Killing relevance 0.34 · 15.2% (78 of 512 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.09 · 21.3% (109 of 512 decks)
- Seedling Charm relevance 0.24 · 12.7% (65 of 512 decks)
- Heroic Intervention relevance 0.07 · 15.2% (78 of 512 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.09 · 11.5% (59 of 512 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.07 · 18.4% (94 of 512 decks)
Sorceries
14
Sorceries
14 Showing 1-10 of 14
Page size
All sorceries (14)
- Revenge of the Hunted relevance 0.26 · 17.0% (87 of 512 decks)
- Roar of Challenge relevance 0.23 · 20.7% (106 of 512 decks)
- Wrath of God relevance 0.10 · 10.9% (56 of 512 decks)
- Winds of Rath relevance 0.16 · 12.1% (62 of 512 decks)
- Open the Armory relevance 0.11 · 14.3% (73 of 512 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.09 · 11.1% (57 of 512 decks)
- Nature's Lore relevance 0.08 · 15.2% (78 of 512 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.10 · 10.9% (56 of 512 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.09 · 19.1% (98 of 512 decks)
- Cultivate relevance 0.08 · 27.7% (142 of 512 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.08 · 12.1% (62 of 512 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.08 · 11.5% (59 of 512 decks)
- Farseek relevance 0.07 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Sylvan Offering relevance 0.18 · 12.7% (65 of 512 decks)
Utility Lands
4
Utility Lands
4 Showing 1-4 of 4
Page size
All utility lands (4)
- Cathedral of Serra relevance 0.23 · 11.5% (59 of 512 decks)
- Krosan Verge relevance 0.12 · 14.8% (76 of 512 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.00 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.00 · 26.6% (136 of 512 decks)
Lands
24
Lands
24 Showing 1-10 of 24
Page size
All lands (24)
- Brushland relevance 0.18 · 17.4% (89 of 512 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 16.6% (85 of 512 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.20 · 17.6% (90 of 512 decks)
- Fortified Village relevance 0.20 · 15.4% (79 of 512 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.19 · 15.6% (80 of 512 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.19 · 22.9% (117 of 512 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.19 · 16.6% (85 of 512 decks)
- Canopy Vista relevance 0.17 · 21.9% (112 of 512 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.16 · 23.6% (121 of 512 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.17 · 10.9% (56 of 512 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.17 · 17.0% (87 of 512 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.16 · 11.9% (61 of 512 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.16 · 17.4% (89 of 512 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.16 · 15.2% (78 of 512 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.14 · 16.4% (84 of 512 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.05 · 88.5% (453 of 512 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.05 · 52.9% (271 of 512 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.03 · 15.4% (79 of 512 decks)
- Island relevance 0.05 · 35.7% (183 of 512 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.02 · 11.3% (58 of 512 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.00 · 14.3% (73 of 512 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.00 · 15.0% (77 of 512 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.00 · 12.3% (63 of 512 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.00 · 54.7% (280 of 512 decks)
5 EDH commanders that play like Chatzuk, Mighty Guitarist, and the cards they share.