Cards like Prismari Command
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
62% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Prismari Command 75%
- Flame of Anor 71%
Cards like Mystic Confluence
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
82% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
57% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.7 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Mystic Confluence 64%
- Sublime Epiphany 57%
- Cryptic Command 46%
Cards like Fiery Confluence
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Fiery Confluence 59%
- Abrade 50%
- Explosive Derailment 13%
- Overwhelming Surge 7%
Other options: Tangletrap, Shredded Sails, Reckless Air Strike, Molten Blast, Slight Malfunction, Start from Scratch
Cards like Izzet Charm
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
41% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Izzet Charm 53%
- Decisive Denial 46%
- Quandrix Charm 22%
Cards like Goblin Electromancer
8.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Temur decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Temur decks
Cards
- Goblin Electromancer 51%
- Stormcatch Mentor 44%
- Baral, Chief of Compliance 21%
- Haughty Djinn 9%
- Mocking Sprite 3%
Other options: Spectacle Mage
Cards like Trash the Town
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
32% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
1.0 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Temur decks
Cards like Return from the Wilds
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Archmage Emeritus
7.5× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Temur decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Muse Seeker, Windrider Wizard, Lunar Mystic, Academy Wall
Cards like Titania's Command
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.83 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Archmage's Charm
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Collective Resistance
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
69% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Temur decks
17% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Murmuring Mystic
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Return the Favor
6.9× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
72% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Temur decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Reverberate, Display of Power, Twincast, Wild Ricochet
Cards like Heritage Reclamation
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Temur decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Guttersnipe
9.3× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Rockslide Sorcerer, Weaver of Lightning, Satyr Firedancer
Cards like Coruscation Mage
3.6× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Temur decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Temur decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Temur decks
Cards
Other options: Firespitter Whelp
Cards like Applied Biomancy
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.39 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Collective Defiance
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other Temur decks
Cards
Cards like Amazing Acrobatics
Over 20× as likely as other Temur decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Temur decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Temur decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Temur decks
All top picks (50)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.81 · 70.3% (2,460 of 3,500 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 0.80 · 70.7% (2,474 of 3,500 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.73 · 75.3% (2,636 of 3,500 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.82 · 60.9% (2,133 of 3,500 decks)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.87 · 54.4% (1,904 of 3,500 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.85 · 56.0% (1,960 of 3,500 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.87 · 51.0% (1,786 of 3,500 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.76 · 64.0% (2,239 of 3,500 decks)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.78 · 60.3% (2,109 of 3,500 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.80 · 57.4% (2,009 of 3,500 decks)
- Fiery Confluence relevance 0.77 · 59.1% (2,069 of 3,500 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.72 · 65.0% (2,275 of 3,500 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.91 · 39.8% (1,393 of 3,500 decks)
- Great Train Heist relevance 0.74 · 59.7% (2,090 of 3,500 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.67 · 68.6% (2,400 of 3,500 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.78 · 53.3% (1,865 of 3,500 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.88 · 39.5% (1,384 of 3,500 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.81 · 45.9% (1,605 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.80 · 45.7% (1,598 of 3,500 decks)
- Metamorphic Blast relevance 0.93 · 31.3% (1,096 of 3,500 decks)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.91 · 32.6% (1,140 of 3,500 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 0.91 · 31.9% (1,116 of 3,500 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.68 · 57.3% (2,005 of 3,500 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.75 · 47.1% (1,650 of 3,500 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.84 · 35.7% (1,248 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.80 · 39.7% (1,391 of 3,500 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 49.6% (1,735 of 3,500 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.87 · 30.6% (1,072 of 3,500 decks)
- Mishra's Command relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (855 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of the Bold relevance 0.91 · 25.9% (906 of 3,500 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.90 · 26.0% (909 of 3,500 decks)
- Phantom Interference relevance 0.93 · 23.2% (813 of 3,500 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.87 · 29.3% (1,025 of 3,500 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (1,125 of 3,500 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.61 · 63.1% (2,207 of 3,500 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.85 · 30.7% (1,074 of 3,500 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (772 of 3,500 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 0.85 · 30.0% (1,050 of 3,500 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.93 · 20.2% (708 of 3,500 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.71 · 46.1% (1,615 of 3,500 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (790 of 3,500 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.94 · 17.0% (594 of 3,500 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.78 · 33.0% (1,156 of 3,500 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.88 · 20.8% (728 of 3,500 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.91 · 17.3% (605 of 3,500 decks)
- Collective Defiance relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (720 of 3,500 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.59 · 58.4% (2,043 of 3,500 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (707 of 3,500 decks)
- Balmor, Battlemage Captain relevance 0.76 · 33.2% (1,163 of 3,500 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.79 · 29.8% (1,042 of 3,500 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Harmonic Prodigy relevance 0.78 · 60.3% (2,109 of 3,500 decks)
- Ojer Pakpatiq, Deepest Epoch // Temple of Cyclical Time relevance 0.78 · 33.0% (1,156 of 3,500 decks)
- Hermes, Overseer of Elpis relevance 0.88 · 20.8% (728 of 3,500 decks)
- Veyran, Voice of Duality relevance 0.59 · 58.4% (2,043 of 3,500 decks)
- Balmor, Battlemage Captain relevance 0.76 · 33.2% (1,163 of 3,500 decks)
- Magnus the Red relevance 0.89 · 16.2% (566 of 3,500 decks)
- Murmuring Mystic relevance 0.74 · 33.5% (1,172 of 3,500 decks)
- Third Path Iconoclast relevance 0.68 · 34.5% (1,207 of 3,500 decks)
- Young Pyromancer relevance 0.65 · 38.9% (1,360 of 3,500 decks)
- Exalted Flamer of Tzeentch relevance 0.79 · 15.4% (540 of 3,500 decks)
- Talrand, Sky Summoner relevance 0.62 · 37.9% (1,326 of 3,500 decks)
- Eccentric Apprentice relevance 0.94 · 5.6% (195 of 3,500 decks)
- Inspiring Bard relevance 0.94 · 5.1% (180 of 3,500 decks)
- Quandrix Apprentice relevance 0.74 · 15.4% (540 of 3,500 decks)
- Yuan-Ti Malison relevance 0.92 · 5.5% (193 of 3,500 decks)
- Intrepid Outlander relevance 0.93 · 5.0% (176 of 3,500 decks)
- Goblin Electromancer relevance 0.51 · 50.7% (1,775 of 3,500 decks)
- Baral, Chief of Compliance relevance 0.68 · 21.1% (737 of 3,500 decks)
- Feywild Caretaker relevance 0.90 · 5.6% (197 of 3,500 decks)
- Plundering Barbarian relevance 0.90 · 5.6% (195 of 3,500 decks)
- Aarakocra Sneak relevance 0.91 · 5.1% (179 of 3,500 decks)
- Bloodboil Sorcerer relevance 0.91 · 5.1% (180 of 3,500 decks)
- Elrond of the White Council relevance 0.90 · 5.2% (182 of 3,500 decks)
- Wandering Troubadour relevance 0.89 · 5.5% (193 of 3,500 decks)
- Caves of Chaos Adventurer relevance 0.87 · 6.2% (216 of 3,500 decks)
- Undermountain Adventurer relevance 0.86 · 6.2% (218 of 3,500 decks)
- Tomb of Horrors Adventurer relevance 0.86 · 6.0% (211 of 3,500 decks)
- Archmage Emeritus relevance 0.46 · 55.7% (1,949 of 3,500 decks)
- Archmage of Runes relevance 0.55 · 36.7% (1,286 of 3,500 decks)
- Stormcatch Mentor relevance 0.51 · 43.8% (1,533 of 3,500 decks)
- Balor relevance 0.82 · 6.5% (226 of 3,500 decks)
- Avenging Hunter relevance 0.84 · 5.3% (187 of 3,500 decks)
- Tectonic Giant relevance 0.82 · 5.9% (206 of 3,500 decks)
- Guttersnipe relevance 0.52 · 37.9% (1,325 of 3,500 decks)
- Círdan the Shipwright relevance 0.83 · 5.2% (182 of 3,500 decks)
- Gandalf the Grey relevance 0.80 · 6.3% (222 of 3,500 decks)
- Thunderclap Drake relevance 0.63 · 18.0% (631 of 3,500 decks)
- Octavia, Living Thesis relevance 0.82 · 5.2% (181 of 3,500 decks)
- Gale, Waterdeep Prodigy relevance 0.80 · 5.4% (189 of 3,500 decks)
- Baral and Kari Zev relevance 0.78 · 6.6% (230 of 3,500 decks)
- Haughty Djinn relevance 0.72 · 9.4% (330 of 3,500 decks)
- Wizards of Thay relevance 0.77 · 6.6% (232 of 3,500 decks)
- Stirring Bard relevance 0.77 · 5.3% (186 of 3,500 decks)
- Storm-Kiln Artist relevance 0.43 · 48.9% (1,711 of 3,500 decks)
- The Tarrasque relevance 0.75 · 5.5% (193 of 3,500 decks)
- Ovika, Enigma Goliath relevance 0.73 · 6.3% (220 of 3,500 decks)
- Coruscation Mage relevance 0.58 · 17.3% (606 of 3,500 decks)
- Riku of Two Reflections relevance 0.74 · 5.7% (200 of 3,500 decks)
- Agitator Ant relevance 0.77 · 4.8% (167 of 3,500 decks)
- Party Thrasher relevance 0.64 · 10.7% (373 of 3,500 decks)
All artifacts (25)
- Mindsplice Apparatus relevance 0.78 · 11.7% (409 of 3,500 decks)
- Sarevok's Tome relevance 0.90 · 5.4% (190 of 3,500 decks)
- Wizard's Spellbook relevance 0.88 · 6.0% (210 of 3,500 decks)
- Component Pouch relevance 0.89 · 5.3% (186 of 3,500 decks)
- Wizard's Staff relevance 0.76 · 10.0% (350 of 3,500 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.58 · 24.6% (861 of 3,500 decks)
- Glamdring relevance 0.77 · 5.9% (208 of 3,500 decks)
- Resonating Lute relevance 0.60 · 17.9% (627 of 3,500 decks)
- Wand of Wonder relevance 0.74 · 5.8% (203 of 3,500 decks)
- Proteus Staff relevance 0.72 · 3.4% (119 of 3,500 decks)
- Izzet Signet relevance 0.41 · 11.1% (389 of 3,500 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.40 · 9.7% (341 of 3,500 decks)
- Gruul Signet relevance 0.41 · 7.7% (271 of 3,500 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.33 · 15.6% (547 of 3,500 decks)
- Bender's Waterskin relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (166 of 3,500 decks)
- Talisman of Creativity relevance 0.31 · 15.4% (539 of 3,500 decks)
- Talisman of Impulse relevance 0.31 · 12.9% (451 of 3,500 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.36 · 5.5% (193 of 3,500 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.26 · 21.2% (742 of 3,500 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.37 · 3.5% (122 of 3,500 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.26 · 9.1% (318 of 3,500 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 12.8% (448 of 3,500 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.32 · 3.8% (134 of 3,500 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.08 · 62.2% (2,178 of 3,500 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.05 · 61.8% (2,164 of 3,500 decks)
All enchantments (26)
- Sorcerer Class relevance 0.80 · 17.7% (621 of 3,500 decks)
- Arcane Bombardment relevance 0.73 · 21.7% (761 of 3,500 decks)
- Find the Path relevance 0.92 · 5.6% (196 of 3,500 decks)
- Wilderness Reclamation relevance 0.59 · 36.5% (1,276 of 3,500 decks)
- Loot Dispute relevance 0.89 · 6.0% (209 of 3,500 decks)
- Fly relevance 0.90 · 5.3% (186 of 3,500 decks)
- Case of the Ransacked Lab relevance 0.67 · 17.1% (599 of 3,500 decks)
- Fiery Inscription relevance 0.64 · 16.5% (579 of 3,500 decks)
- Shark Typhoon relevance 0.68 · 9.9% (346 of 3,500 decks)
- Cryptolith Rite relevance 0.47 · 17.3% (606 of 3,500 decks)
- Rite of the Dragoncaller relevance 0.55 · 8.1% (285 of 3,500 decks)
- Shared Animosity relevance 0.54 · 9.1% (320 of 3,500 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.68 · 3.8% (134 of 3,500 decks)
- Metallurgic Summonings relevance 0.71 · 3.2% (113 of 3,500 decks)
- Raiding Schemes relevance 0.69 · 3.4% (119 of 3,500 decks)
- Beastmaster Ascension relevance 0.51 · 5.2% (182 of 3,500 decks)
- Thousand-Year Storm relevance 0.45 · 9.1% (319 of 3,500 decks)
- Frostcliff Siege relevance 0.40 · 10.8% (379 of 3,500 decks)
- Double Vision relevance 0.55 · 3.9% (136 of 3,500 decks)
- Impact Tremors relevance 0.41 · 7.3% (255 of 3,500 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.39 · 6.1% (214 of 3,500 decks)
- Springleaf Parade relevance 0.51 · 2.7% (94 of 3,500 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.26 · 7.4% (259 of 3,500 decks)
- Parallel Lives relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (93 of 3,500 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.27 · 3.5% (122 of 3,500 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.28 · 3.3% (114 of 3,500 decks)
All instants (50)
- Quandrix Command relevance 0.81 · 70.3% (2,460 of 3,500 decks)
- Flame of Anor relevance 0.80 · 70.7% (2,474 of 3,500 decks)
- Prismari Command relevance 0.73 · 75.3% (2,636 of 3,500 decks)
- Atarka's Command relevance 0.82 · 60.9% (2,133 of 3,500 decks)
- Trash the Town relevance 0.85 · 56.0% (1,960 of 3,500 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.76 · 64.0% (2,239 of 3,500 decks)
- Sublime Epiphany relevance 0.80 · 57.4% (2,009 of 3,500 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.72 · 65.0% (2,275 of 3,500 decks)
- Great Train Heist relevance 0.74 · 59.7% (2,090 of 3,500 decks)
- Return the Favor relevance 0.67 · 68.6% (2,400 of 3,500 decks)
- Izzet Charm relevance 0.78 · 53.3% (1,865 of 3,500 decks)
- Cryptic Command relevance 0.81 · 45.9% (1,605 of 3,500 decks)
- Metamorphic Blast relevance 0.93 · 31.3% (1,096 of 3,500 decks)
- Verdant Command relevance 0.91 · 32.6% (1,140 of 3,500 decks)
- Simic Charm relevance 0.68 · 57.3% (2,005 of 3,500 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.75 · 47.1% (1,650 of 3,500 decks)
- Archmage's Charm relevance 0.84 · 35.7% (1,248 of 3,500 decks)
- Phantom Interference relevance 0.93 · 23.2% (813 of 3,500 decks)
- You See a Guard Approach relevance 0.87 · 29.3% (1,025 of 3,500 decks)
- See Double relevance 0.84 · 32.1% (1,125 of 3,500 decks)
- Collective Resistance relevance 0.61 · 63.1% (2,207 of 3,500 decks)
- Applied Biomancy relevance 0.92 · 22.1% (772 of 3,500 decks)
- Artistic Refusal relevance 0.93 · 20.2% (708 of 3,500 decks)
- Twinferno relevance 0.71 · 46.1% (1,615 of 3,500 decks)
- You Find the Villains' Lair relevance 0.89 · 22.6% (790 of 3,500 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.87 · 20.2% (707 of 3,500 decks)
- Prismari Charm relevance 0.80 · 25.2% (882 of 3,500 decks)
- Explosive Derailment relevance 0.93 · 12.7% (446 of 3,500 decks)
- You Find Some Prisoners relevance 0.89 · 14.4% (505 of 3,500 decks)
- Savage Alliance relevance 0.95 · 11.2% (391 of 3,500 decks)
- Untimely Malfunction relevance 0.66 · 40.9% (1,433 of 3,500 decks)
- Defabricate relevance 0.89 · 13.6% (477 of 3,500 decks)
- Abrade relevance 0.59 · 49.8% (1,744 of 3,500 decks)
- You Happen On a Glade relevance 0.88 · 13.2% (463 of 3,500 decks)
- Amazing Acrobatics relevance 0.81 · 18.9% (663 of 3,500 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.61 · 46.1% (1,612 of 3,500 decks)
- You See a Pair of Goblins relevance 0.94 · 10.2% (356 of 3,500 decks)
- Evolution Charm relevance 0.82 · 15.1% (530 of 3,500 decks)
- Quandrix Charm relevance 0.76 · 22.1% (774 of 3,500 decks)
- You Come to a River relevance 0.80 · 17.4% (608 of 3,500 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.69 · 31.4% (1,100 of 3,500 decks)
- Confounding Riddle relevance 0.88 · 11.5% (402 of 3,500 decks)
- Ashling's Command relevance 0.76 · 19.1% (668 of 3,500 decks)
- Wild Shape relevance 0.87 · 10.9% (383 of 3,500 decks)
- Go Forth relevance 0.87 · 10.5% (369 of 3,500 decks)
- Temur Charm relevance 0.64 · 35.0% (1,226 of 3,500 decks)
- You Come to the Gnoll Camp relevance 0.93 · 7.2% (252 of 3,500 decks)
- Secret Identity relevance 0.89 · 7.9% (275 of 3,500 decks)
- Brutal Expulsion relevance 0.92 · 6.0% (211 of 3,500 decks)
- Choose Your Weapon relevance 0.82 · 10.3% (361 of 3,500 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Return from the Wilds relevance 0.87 · 54.4% (1,904 of 3,500 decks)
- Titania's Command relevance 0.87 · 51.0% (1,786 of 3,500 decks)
- Fiery Confluence relevance 0.77 · 59.1% (2,069 of 3,500 decks)
- Shifting Grift relevance 0.91 · 39.8% (1,393 of 3,500 decks)
- Dance of the Tumbleweeds relevance 0.88 · 39.5% (1,384 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.80 · 45.7% (1,598 of 3,500 decks)
- Verdant Confluence relevance 0.91 · 31.9% (1,116 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.80 · 39.7% (1,391 of 3,500 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.72 · 49.6% (1,735 of 3,500 decks)
- Glimpse the Core relevance 0.87 · 30.6% (1,072 of 3,500 decks)
- Mishra's Command relevance 0.92 · 24.4% (855 of 3,500 decks)
- Season of the Bold relevance 0.91 · 25.9% (906 of 3,500 decks)
- Rootcast Apprenticeship relevance 0.90 · 26.0% (909 of 3,500 decks)
- Primal Command relevance 0.85 · 30.7% (1,074 of 3,500 decks)
- Clan Defiance relevance 0.85 · 30.0% (1,050 of 3,500 decks)
- Jailbreak Scheme relevance 0.94 · 17.0% (594 of 3,500 decks)
- Sakashima's Will relevance 0.91 · 17.3% (605 of 3,500 decks)
- Collective Defiance relevance 0.87 · 20.6% (720 of 3,500 decks)
- Pick Your Poison relevance 0.79 · 29.8% (1,042 of 3,500 decks)
- Inscription of Insight relevance 0.93 · 10.8% (378 of 3,500 decks)
- Steal the Show relevance 0.86 · 13.5% (471 of 3,500 decks)
- Will of the Jeskai relevance 0.80 · 18.2% (636 of 3,500 decks)
- You Find a Cursed Idol relevance 0.90 · 10.5% (369 of 3,500 decks)
- You Meet in a Tavern relevance 0.92 · 8.4% (294 of 3,500 decks)
- You've Been Caught Stealing relevance 0.92 · 7.5% (261 of 3,500 decks)
- Planewide Celebration relevance 0.90 · 6.5% (229 of 3,500 decks)
- Thirsting Roots relevance 0.82 · 9.6% (335 of 3,500 decks)
- Splatter Technique relevance 0.83 · 8.7% (305 of 3,500 decks)
- Kick in the Door relevance 0.91 · 4.9% (173 of 3,500 decks)
- Into the Fire relevance 0.87 · 5.9% (208 of 3,500 decks)
- Mob Rule relevance 0.80 · 9.3% (325 of 3,500 decks)
- Mob Verdict relevance 0.88 · 5.3% (184 of 3,500 decks)
- Travel Through Caradhras relevance 0.91 · 4.8% (168 of 3,500 decks)
- Brotherhood's End relevance 0.79 · 9.6% (337 of 3,500 decks)
- Burn Down the House relevance 0.87 · 5.5% (194 of 3,500 decks)
- Over the Edge relevance 0.83 · 6.9% (241 of 3,500 decks)
- Cosmium Confluence relevance 0.85 · 5.3% (185 of 3,500 decks)
- Ember Island Production relevance 0.78 · 9.2% (321 of 3,500 decks)
- Suplex relevance 0.83 · 6.3% (222 of 3,500 decks)
- Journey of Discovery relevance 0.77 · 9.2% (321 of 3,500 decks)
- Road of Return relevance 0.84 · 5.2% (181 of 3,500 decks)
- Explore the Underdark relevance 0.82 · 5.8% (204 of 3,500 decks)
- Surge to Victory relevance 0.80 · 6.7% (233 of 3,500 decks)
- Heroes' Hangout relevance 0.85 · 4.9% (170 of 3,500 decks)
- Will of the Sultai relevance 0.79 · 6.4% (223 of 3,500 decks)
- Mizzix's Mastery relevance 0.62 · 13.8% (483 of 3,500 decks)
- Truth or Consequences relevance 0.74 · 5.3% (186 of 3,500 decks)
- Hull Breach relevance 0.54 · 22.9% (801 of 3,500 decks)
- Incendiary Command relevance 0.76 · 4.3% (151 of 3,500 decks)
- Rain of Thorns relevance 0.88 · 3.2% (111 of 3,500 decks)
All planeswalkers (2)
- Ral, Crackling Wit relevance 0.54 · 7.1% (247 of 3,500 decks)
- Ral, Monsoon Mage // Ral, Leyline Prodigy relevance 0.56 · 5.6% (197 of 3,500 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All battles (1)
- Invasion of Segovia // Caetus, Sea Tyrant of Segovia relevance 0.83 · 6.3% (222 of 3,500 decks)
All utility lands (34)
- Riptide Laboratory relevance 0.90 · 17.7% (619 of 3,500 decks)
- Pinnacle Monk // Mystic Peak relevance 0.58 · 12.4% (435 of 3,500 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.53 · 14.8% (517 of 3,500 decks)
- Kazandu Refuge relevance 0.66 · 5.1% (177 of 3,500 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.48 · 8.8% (309 of 3,500 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.66 · 3.4% (119 of 3,500 decks)
- Hidden Nursery relevance 0.65 · 3.5% (123 of 3,500 decks)
- Hidden Volcano relevance 0.65 · 3.3% (117 of 3,500 decks)
- Silundi Vision // Silundi Isle relevance 0.56 · 3.8% (134 of 3,500 decks)
- Fiery Islet relevance 0.45 · 6.3% (219 of 3,500 decks)
- Thundering Falls relevance 0.40 · 10.5% (369 of 3,500 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (241 of 3,500 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.40 · 7.7% (271 of 3,500 decks)
- Commercial District relevance 0.37 · 10.6% (371 of 3,500 decks)
- Temple of Epiphany relevance 0.34 · 14.7% (515 of 3,500 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.36 · 10.9% (381 of 3,500 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.39 · 5.9% (208 of 3,500 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.30 · 18.0% (631 of 3,500 decks)
- Bountiful Landscape relevance 0.28 · 20.8% (728 of 3,500 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.30 · 12.9% (452 of 3,500 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.43 · 3.9% (135 of 3,500 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.25 · 26.4% (924 of 3,500 decks)
- Temple of Abandon relevance 0.29 · 12.2% (426 of 3,500 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.31 · 10.0% (350 of 3,500 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.36 · 4.6% (162 of 3,500 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.30 · 8.6% (301 of 3,500 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.29 · 10.7% (374 of 3,500 decks)
- Ketria Triome relevance 0.20 · 38.8% (1,357 of 3,500 decks)
- Valakut Awakening // Valakut Stoneforge relevance 0.44 · 2.7% (93 of 3,500 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.25 · 10.7% (375 of 3,500 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 19.4% (680 of 3,500 decks)
- Stump Stomp // Burnwillow Clearing relevance 0.38 · 3.1% (107 of 3,500 decks)
- Sheltered Thicket relevance 0.29 · 3.9% (135 of 3,500 decks)
- Kessig Wolf Run relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (95 of 3,500 decks)
All lands (50)
- Primal Amulet // Primal Wellspring relevance 0.57 · 7.1% (247 of 3,500 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.64 · 4.3% (152 of 3,500 decks)
- Wooded Ridgeline relevance 0.55 · 6.5% (229 of 3,500 decks)
- Cascade Bluffs relevance 0.42 · 20.0% (700 of 3,500 decks)
- Eroded Canyon relevance 0.64 · 4.1% (144 of 3,500 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.46 · 11.2% (392 of 3,500 decks)
- Bristling Backwoods relevance 0.62 · 3.9% (137 of 3,500 decks)
- Spirebluff Canal relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (188 of 3,500 decks)
- Ferrous Lake relevance 0.49 · 5.7% (198 of 3,500 decks)
- Stormcarved Coast relevance 0.30 · 41.1% (1,440 of 3,500 decks)
- Fire-Lit Thicket relevance 0.45 · 8.3% (289 of 3,500 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.46 · 5.8% (202 of 3,500 decks)
- Riverglide Pathway // Lavaglide Pathway relevance 0.45 · 6.1% (212 of 3,500 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.44 · 6.4% (223 of 3,500 decks)
- Frostboil Snarl relevance 0.39 · 10.9% (382 of 3,500 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.39 · 10.1% (352 of 3,500 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.25 · 47.2% (1,652 of 3,500 decks)
- Cragcrown Pathway // Timbercrown Pathway relevance 0.42 · 5.6% (195 of 3,500 decks)
- Riverpyre Verge relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (226 of 3,500 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.30 · 22.4% (783 of 3,500 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (214 of 3,500 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (249 of 3,500 decks)
- Copperline Gorge relevance 0.44 · 4.3% (149 of 3,500 decks)
- Thornspire Verge relevance 0.37 · 7.2% (252 of 3,500 decks)
- Izzet Boilerworks relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (325 of 3,500 decks)
- Swiftwater Cliffs relevance 0.41 · 4.6% (161 of 3,500 decks)
- Game Trail relevance 0.35 · 9.3% (325 of 3,500 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.32 · 12.3% (429 of 3,500 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.32 · 11.7% (408 of 3,500 decks)
- Rockfall Vale relevance 0.23 · 41.7% (1,459 of 3,500 decks)
- Training Center relevance 0.25 · 28.9% (1,011 of 3,500 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.33 · 9.4% (330 of 3,500 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.38 · 4.6% (160 of 3,500 decks)
- Turbulent Springs relevance 0.47 · 3.2% (111 of 3,500 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.38 · 4.5% (157 of 3,500 decks)
- Mossfire Valley relevance 0.32 · 8.2% (286 of 3,500 decks)
- Shivan Reef relevance 0.21 · 40.2% (1,406 of 3,500 decks)
- Spire Garden relevance 0.24 · 28.2% (986 of 3,500 decks)
- Gruul Turf relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (243 of 3,500 decks)
- Rugged Highlands relevance 0.38 · 4.3% (152 of 3,500 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.22 · 31.3% (1,097 of 3,500 decks)
- Volcanic Island relevance 0.30 · 9.0% (315 of 3,500 decks)
- Sulfur Falls relevance 0.17 · 52.5% (1,837 of 3,500 decks)
- Taiga relevance 0.29 · 9.1% (317 of 3,500 decks)
- Karplusan Forest relevance 0.22 · 28.3% (991 of 3,500 decks)
- Scorched Geyser relevance 0.44 · 2.9% (103 of 3,500 decks)
- Turbulent Wilderness relevance 0.45 · 2.9% (101 of 3,500 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.29 · 8.9% (313 of 3,500 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.35 · 4.4% (153 of 3,500 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.20 · 37.3% (1,305 of 3,500 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Riku of Many Paths, from 3,500 real Commander decks.