Cards like Rhystic Study
4.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
76% of decks run one or more
vs. 33% of other Esper decks
58% of decks run two or more
vs. 12% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.45 in other Esper decks
Cards like Sol Ring
7.1× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
100% of decks run one or more
vs. 86% of other Esper decks
52% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.96 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Sol Ring 100%
- Mana Vault 45%
- Basalt Monolith 23%
- Grim Monolith 22%
Cards like Voice of Victory
12× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
79% of decks run one or more
vs. 16% of other Esper decks
44% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Voice of Victory 73%
- Grand Abolisher 50%
Cards like Flusterstorm
11× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Esper decks
43% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.14 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Flusterstorm 49%
- Mental Misstep 42%
- Dispel 15%
- Miscast 2%
Other options: Spell Blast, Spell Burst, Clash of Wills
Cards like Vampiric Tutor
6.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 17% of other Esper decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other Esper decks
Cards like Demonic Consultation
9.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Esper decks
37% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Demonic Consultation 47%
- Tainted Pact 39%
Cards like Force of Will
5.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
56% of decks run one or more
vs. 14% of other Esper decks
40% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
0.96 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Force of Will 50%
- Force of Negation 47%
Cards like Smothering Tithe
18× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
93% of decks run one or more
vs. 26% of other Esper decks
33% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
1.3 per deck on average
vs. 0.28 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Chrome Mox
7.9× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Esper decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
0.81 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Chrome Mox 47%
- Mox Diamond 34%
Cards like Talisman of Progress
1.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 57% of other Esper decks
76% of decks run two or more
vs. 49% of other Esper decks
2.2 per deck on average
vs. 1.4 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
15× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
61% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
19% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.80 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards like Silence
10× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Silence 55%
- Orim's Chant 21%
Cards like Elas il-Kor, Sadistic Pilgrim
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Esper decks
Cards like Commandeer
17× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Esper decks
15% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Esper decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Commandeer 20%
- Misdirection 16%
- Snapback 7%
- Disrupting Shoal 3%
Cards like Mirrormade
3.8× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
26% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Esper decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Esper decks
Cards like Cyclonic Rift
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.64 per deck on average
vs. 0.20 in other Esper decks
Cards like Fierce Guardianship
1.6× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 25% of other Esper decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Esper decks
0.76 per deck on average
vs. 0.35 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Mastermind
3.4× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
52% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Esper decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Esper decks
Cards
Other options: Consecrated Sphinx, The Unagi of Kyoshi Island
Cards like Bastion of Remembrance
Over 20× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Esper decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Esper decks
Cards
Cards like Swan Song
3.5× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 21% of other Esper decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
0.75 per deck on average
vs. 0.22 in other Esper decks
Cards
- Swan Song 69%
- Strix Serenade 6%
Cards like Elspeth, Storm Slayer
15× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
Cards like Clever Impersonator
13× as likely as other Esper decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Esper decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Esper decks
0.20 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Esper decks
All top picks (50)
- Kambal, Profiteering Mayor relevance 0.45 · 79.5% (171 of 215 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.49 · 57.7% (124 of 215 decks)
- Warren Soultrader relevance 0.39 · 79.1% (170 of 215 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.53 · 44.2% (95 of 215 decks)
- Charismatic Conqueror relevance 0.49 · 48.8% (105 of 215 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.47 · 49.8% (107 of 215 decks)
- Ocelot Pride relevance 0.47 · 47.9% (103 of 215 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.53 · 32.1% (69 of 215 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.48 · 41.9% (90 of 215 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.53 · 28.8% (62 of 215 decks)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.50 · 33.0% (71 of 215 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.38 · 60.0% (129 of 215 decks)
- Exalted Sunborn relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.44 · 35.8% (77 of 215 decks)
- Adeline, Resplendent Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (55 of 215 decks)
- Mondrak, Glory Dominus relevance 0.45 · 31.6% (68 of 215 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.37 · 48.8% (105 of 215 decks)
- Caretaker's Talent relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (36 of 215 decks)
- Prince Imrahil the Fair relevance 0.52 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Ophiomancer relevance 0.51 · 15.8% (34 of 215 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- Commissar Severina Raine relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (29 of 215 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 0.42 · 35.3% (76 of 215 decks)
- The Queen of Dale relevance 0.41 · 37.2% (80 of 215 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Ultramarines Honour Guard relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (29 of 215 decks)
- Elas il-Kor, Sadistic Pilgrim relevance 0.45 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Space Marine Devastator relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (25 of 215 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.42 · 29.3% (63 of 215 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.45 · 23.7% (51 of 215 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.39 · 38.1% (82 of 215 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.43 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Myrel, Shield of Argive relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.31 · 53.0% (114 of 215 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (35 of 215 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.46 · 15.8% (34 of 215 decks)
- Tivit, Seller of Secrets relevance 0.42 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.28 · 60.9% (131 of 215 decks)
- Zulaport Cutthroat relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Thalisse, Reverent Medium relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.43 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- Jadar, Ghoulcaller of Nephalia relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER // Sephiroth, One-Winged Angel relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Vanguard Suppressor relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.24 · 73.0% (157 of 215 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Ojer Taq, Deepest Foundation // Temple of Civilization relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.42 · 18.1% (39 of 215 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Kambal, Profiteering Mayor relevance 0.45 · 79.5% (171 of 215 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.49 · 57.7% (124 of 215 decks)
- Warren Soultrader relevance 0.39 · 79.1% (170 of 215 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.53 · 44.2% (95 of 215 decks)
- Charismatic Conqueror relevance 0.49 · 48.8% (105 of 215 decks)
- Grim Hireling relevance 0.47 · 49.8% (107 of 215 decks)
- Ocelot Pride relevance 0.47 · 47.9% (103 of 215 decks)
- Monastery Mentor relevance 0.53 · 32.1% (69 of 215 decks)
- Pitiless Plunderer relevance 0.48 · 41.9% (90 of 215 decks)
- Faerie Artisans relevance 0.53 · 28.8% (62 of 215 decks)
- Exalted Sunborn relevance 0.51 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Mirkwood Bats relevance 0.44 · 35.8% (77 of 215 decks)
- Adeline, Resplendent Cathar relevance 0.48 · 25.6% (55 of 215 decks)
- Mondrak, Glory Dominus relevance 0.45 · 31.6% (68 of 215 decks)
- Prince Imrahil the Fair relevance 0.52 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Ophiomancer relevance 0.51 · 15.8% (34 of 215 decks)
- Commissar Severina Raine relevance 0.53 · 13.5% (29 of 215 decks)
- The Queen of Dale relevance 0.41 · 37.2% (80 of 215 decks)
- Emrakul's Messenger relevance 0.49 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Ultramarines Honour Guard relevance 0.53 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Mister Fantastic, Reed Richards relevance 0.51 · 13.5% (29 of 215 decks)
- Elas il-Kor, Sadistic Pilgrim relevance 0.45 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Space Marine Devastator relevance 0.53 · 11.6% (25 of 215 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.43 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Myrel, Shield of Argive relevance 0.47 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Rev, Tithe Extractor relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (35 of 215 decks)
- Tivit, Seller of Secrets relevance 0.42 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Tataru Taru relevance 0.28 · 60.9% (131 of 215 decks)
- Zulaport Cutthroat relevance 0.44 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Thalisse, Reverent Medium relevance 0.51 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Jadar, Ghoulcaller of Nephalia relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Sephiroth, Fabled SOLDIER // Sephiroth, One-Winged Angel relevance 0.49 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Vanguard Suppressor relevance 0.51 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Voice of Victory relevance 0.24 · 73.0% (157 of 215 decks)
- Bitterbloom Bearer relevance 0.46 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Ojer Taq, Deepest Foundation // Temple of Civilization relevance 0.46 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Vexilus Praetor relevance 0.49 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Belladonna Took relevance 0.49 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Sicarian Infiltrator relevance 0.50 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Company Commander relevance 0.50 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Clever Impersonator relevance 0.40 · 17.7% (38 of 215 decks)
- Inquisitor Greyfax relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Bard, King of Dale relevance 0.45 · 10.7% (23 of 215 decks)
- Bastion Protector relevance 0.47 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Nadier's Nightblade relevance 0.42 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Homunculus Horde relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Mockingbird relevance 0.29 · 40.5% (87 of 215 decks)
- Marionette Apprentice relevance 0.37 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Lotho, Corrupt Shirriff relevance 0.17 · 91.6% (197 of 215 decks)
- Bennie Bracks, Zoologist relevance 0.45 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.38 · 60.0% (129 of 215 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.39 · 38.1% (82 of 215 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.43 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- The Golden Throne relevance 0.48 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Oketra's Monument relevance 0.49 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Basalt Monolith relevance 0.36 · 22.8% (49 of 215 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.34 · 20.0% (43 of 215 decks)
- Imposter Mech relevance 0.36 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Inquisitorial Rosette relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Idol of Oblivion relevance 0.41 · 6.5% (14 of 215 decks)
- Wishclaw Talisman relevance 0.22 · 46.5% (100 of 215 decks)
- Grim Monolith relevance 0.28 · 21.9% (47 of 215 decks)
- Thunderhawk Gunship relevance 0.43 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.21 · 44.7% (96 of 215 decks)
- Isochron Scepter relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (21 of 215 decks)
- Rings of Brighthearth relevance 0.35 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Halo Fountain relevance 0.41 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Mox Diamond relevance 0.22 · 34.0% (73 of 215 decks)
- Mox Amber relevance 0.25 · 23.3% (50 of 215 decks)
- Chrome Mox relevance 0.19 · 47.0% (101 of 215 decks)
- Lotus Petal relevance 0.17 · 56.3% (121 of 215 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.19 · 44.7% (96 of 215 decks)
- Time Sieve relevance 0.25 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.22 · 25.6% (55 of 215 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.15 · 60.5% (130 of 215 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.27 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.23 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.18 · 33.5% (72 of 215 decks)
- Talisman of Progress relevance 0.11 · 79.1% (170 of 215 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.13 · 62.3% (134 of 215 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.35 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.20 · 12.6% (27 of 215 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- The Soul Stone relevance 0.26 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Azorius Signet relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (25 of 215 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.30 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Talisman of Dominance relevance 0.09 · 77.2% (166 of 215 decks)
- Dimir Signet relevance 0.18 · 11.6% (25 of 215 decks)
- Damping Sphere relevance 0.28 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Sword of the Meek relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Thopter Foundry relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Grafdigger's Cage relevance 0.20 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.19 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Vexing Bauble relevance 0.17 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Chromatic Lantern relevance 0.16 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.11 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Bolas's Citadel relevance 0.11 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.02 · 98.1% (211 of 215 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.01 · 99.5% (214 of 215 decks)
All enchantments (37)
- Training Grounds relevance 0.50 · 33.0% (71 of 215 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.37 · 48.8% (105 of 215 decks)
- Caretaker's Talent relevance 0.51 · 16.7% (36 of 215 decks)
- Monologue Tax relevance 0.42 · 35.3% (76 of 215 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.42 · 29.3% (63 of 215 decks)
- Bitterblossom relevance 0.45 · 23.7% (51 of 215 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.46 · 15.8% (34 of 215 decks)
- Skrelv's Hive relevance 0.47 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Gleaming Splendor relevance 0.33 · 34.4% (74 of 215 decks)
- Dollmaker's Shop // Porcelain Gallery relevance 0.45 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Black Market Connections relevance 0.27 · 42.8% (92 of 215 decks)
- Copy Enchantment relevance 0.33 · 16.3% (35 of 215 decks)
- Scuttletide relevance 0.45 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Revel in Riches relevance 0.37 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Mirrormade relevance 0.27 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.38 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Steal Enchantment relevance 0.33 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Divine Visitation relevance 0.39 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Birth of the Imperium relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- The Meathook Massacre relevance 0.30 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.12 · 91.2% (196 of 215 decks)
- Trouble in Pairs relevance 0.26 · 7.0% (15 of 215 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.13 · 66.0% (142 of 215 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.10 · 67.4% (145 of 215 decks)
- Endless Foot Assault relevance 0.30 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.27 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Blind Obedience relevance 0.17 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Smuggler's Share relevance 0.24 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Necropotence relevance 0.15 · 7.0% (15 of 215 decks)
- Touch the Spirit Realm relevance 0.20 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Land Tax relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Authority of the Consuls relevance 0.14 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.12 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Phyrexian Arena relevance 0.14 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.09 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
All instants (50)
- Grand Crescendo relevance 0.49 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Culling the Weak relevance 0.36 · 26.0% (56 of 215 decks)
- Deny the Witch relevance 0.47 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (43 of 215 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.29 · 41.4% (89 of 215 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.39 · 13.0% (28 of 215 decks)
- Protect the Negotiators relevance 0.46 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.39 · 11.2% (24 of 215 decks)
- Orim's Chant relevance 0.32 · 20.9% (45 of 215 decks)
- Retraction Helix relevance 0.39 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.34 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Borne Upon a Wind relevance 0.28 · 34.0% (73 of 215 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.33 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.36 · 10.7% (23 of 215 decks)
- Cabal Ritual relevance 0.29 · 24.2% (52 of 215 decks)
- Mindbreak Trap relevance 0.24 · 43.7% (94 of 215 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.38 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Mental Misstep relevance 0.23 · 42.3% (91 of 215 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.30 · 16.3% (35 of 215 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.21 · 49.3% (106 of 215 decks)
- Chain of Vapor relevance 0.28 · 16.7% (36 of 215 decks)
- And They Shall Know No Fear relevance 0.42 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.32 · 9.8% (21 of 215 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.29 · 14.0% (30 of 215 decks)
- Tainted Pact relevance 0.22 · 38.6% (83 of 215 decks)
- Pact of Negation relevance 0.21 · 42.3% (91 of 215 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.33 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Demonic Consultation relevance 0.20 · 47.0% (101 of 215 decks)
- Silence relevance 0.18 · 55.3% (119 of 215 decks)
- Flare of Fortitude relevance 0.32 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Mortify relevance 0.32 · 7.0% (15 of 215 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.14 · 76.7% (165 of 215 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.14 · 73.5% (158 of 215 decks)
- Angel's Grace relevance 0.27 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Force of Negation relevance 0.18 · 46.5% (100 of 215 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.14 · 69.3% (149 of 215 decks)
- Officious Interrogation relevance 0.37 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Mystical Tutor relevance 0.18 · 39.5% (85 of 215 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.16 · 49.8% (107 of 215 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.22 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- Saw in Half relevance 0.28 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.18 · 34.9% (75 of 215 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.15 · 53.5% (115 of 215 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.21 · 19.1% (41 of 215 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.18 · 35.3% (76 of 215 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.15 · 52.6% (113 of 215 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.26 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.16 · 41.4% (89 of 215 decks)
- Plumb the Forbidden relevance 0.36 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.23 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
All sorceries (38)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.31 · 53.0% (114 of 215 decks)
- Flash Photography relevance 0.42 · 18.1% (39 of 215 decks)
- Beseech the Mirror relevance 0.28 · 41.4% (89 of 215 decks)
- Timetwister relevance 0.39 · 10.7% (23 of 215 decks)
- Martial Coup relevance 0.44 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Imperial Seal relevance 0.23 · 37.7% (81 of 215 decks)
- Hour of Reckoning relevance 0.40 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- For the Emperor! relevance 0.43 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.42 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.22 · 28.4% (61 of 215 decks)
- Step Through relevance 0.33 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Mnemonic Betrayal relevance 0.27 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.26 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Tempt with Bunnies relevance 0.39 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Insatiable Avarice relevance 0.29 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.22 · 20.0% (43 of 215 decks)
- Reanimate relevance 0.20 · 21.4% (46 of 215 decks)
- Grim Tutor relevance 0.23 · 11.2% (24 of 215 decks)
- Yawgmoth's Will relevance 0.27 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Toxic Deluge relevance 0.17 · 38.1% (82 of 215 decks)
- Season of the Burrow relevance 0.37 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Demonic Tutor relevance 0.13 · 60.0% (129 of 215 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Praetor's Grasp relevance 0.23 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.26 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Diabolic Tutor relevance 0.23 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Ringsight relevance 0.28 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.18 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Feed the Swarm relevance 0.25 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Gitaxian Probe relevance 0.22 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Scheming Symmetry relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Damnation relevance 0.23 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.18 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Transmute Artifact relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Idyllic Tutor relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.15 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (9)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.50 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- The Theorist, Jace Beleren relevance 0.34 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Kaya, Geist Hunter relevance 0.38 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Elspeth, Sun's Champion relevance 0.35 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.27 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Liliana, Dreadhorde General relevance 0.29 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.22 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.22 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Teferi, Time Raveler relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
All utility lands (39)
- Fountainport relevance 0.48 · 10.2% (22 of 215 decks)
- Field of the Dead relevance 0.32 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.33 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.25 · 18.6% (40 of 215 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.29 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Command Beacon relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.20 · 34.0% (73 of 215 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.28 · 8.4% (18 of 215 decks)
- Plaza of Heroes relevance 0.30 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.16 · 56.7% (122 of 215 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.19 · 34.9% (75 of 215 decks)
- Vault of the Archangel relevance 0.29 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Castle Ardenvale relevance 0.36 · 3.3% (7 of 215 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.18 · 34.9% (75 of 215 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (17 of 215 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.21 · 21.9% (47 of 215 decks)
- Undercity Sewers relevance 0.20 · 27.4% (59 of 215 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.21 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Silent Clearing relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Strip Mine relevance 0.27 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.24 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.19 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.20 · 12.1% (26 of 215 decks)
- Minas Tirith relevance 0.32 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.22 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.21 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Raffine's Tower relevance 0.13 · 39.5% (85 of 215 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.21 · 4.2% (9 of 215 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.22 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Contaminated Landscape relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.21 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.18 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.17 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.21 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.20 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.16 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
- Boggart Trawler // Boggart Bog relevance 0.17 · 2.3% (5 of 215 decks)
- Hall of Heliod's Generosity relevance 0.15 · 2.8% (6 of 215 decks)
All lands (50)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.37 · 20.0% (43 of 215 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.33 · 20.9% (45 of 215 decks)
- Starting Town relevance 0.30 · 22.3% (48 of 215 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.22 · 42.8% (92 of 215 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.21 · 43.7% (94 of 215 decks)
- Bloodstained Mire relevance 0.20 · 47.4% (102 of 215 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.26 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.27 · 14.9% (32 of 215 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.20 · 44.2% (95 of 215 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.22 · 35.3% (76 of 215 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.21 · 37.7% (81 of 215 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.25 · 17.7% (38 of 215 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.19 · 40.0% (86 of 215 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.18 · 46.5% (100 of 215 decks)
- Underground Sea relevance 0.18 · 45.6% (98 of 215 decks)
- Scrubland relevance 0.18 · 45.1% (97 of 215 decks)
- Tarnished Citadel relevance 0.30 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.17 · 48.8% (105 of 215 decks)
- Gloomlake Verge relevance 0.24 · 15.8% (34 of 215 decks)
- Mana Confluence relevance 0.16 · 50.2% (108 of 215 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.15 · 56.3% (121 of 215 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.15 · 56.3% (121 of 215 decks)
- Snow-Covered Plains relevance 0.27 · 6.5% (14 of 215 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.26 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Choked Estuary relevance 0.25 · 9.3% (20 of 215 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.21 · 20.5% (44 of 215 decks)
- Reflecting Pool relevance 0.23 · 13.5% (29 of 215 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.26 · 6.5% (14 of 215 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.13 · 64.7% (139 of 215 decks)
- Snow-Covered Swamp relevance 0.25 · 5.6% (12 of 215 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.20 · 16.7% (36 of 215 decks)
- Forbidden Orchard relevance 0.25 · 5.1% (11 of 215 decks)
- Morphic Pool relevance 0.13 · 60.9% (131 of 215 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.24 · 7.4% (16 of 215 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.24 · 7.0% (15 of 215 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.19 · 17.2% (37 of 215 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.16 · 35.8% (77 of 215 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.16 · 34.4% (74 of 215 decks)
- Sunken Hollow relevance 0.19 · 15.3% (33 of 215 decks)
- Shipwreck Marsh relevance 0.19 · 14.4% (31 of 215 decks)
- Turbulent Moor relevance 0.27 · 3.7% (8 of 215 decks)
- Clearwater Pathway // Murkwater Pathway relevance 0.22 · 6.5% (14 of 215 decks)
- Isolated Chapel relevance 0.16 · 26.5% (57 of 215 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.22 · 4.7% (10 of 215 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.20 · 8.8% (19 of 215 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.22 · 6.0% (13 of 215 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.15 · 27.0% (58 of 215 decks)
- Arcane Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 20.9% (45 of 215 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.09 · 74.4% (160 of 215 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Marneus Calgar, from 215 real Commander decks.