Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.49 · 60.6% (123 of 203 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 62.1% (126 of 203 decks)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.52 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.49 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.58 · 34.5% (70 of 203 decks)
- Oracle's Insight relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 0.53 · 37.4% (76 of 203 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.55 · 34.5% (70 of 203 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.55 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (30 of 203 decks)
- Gift of Strands relevance 0.59 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.50 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.46 · 47.3% (96 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Guide relevance 0.57 · 25.1% (51 of 203 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.56 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.49 · 33.5% (68 of 203 decks)
- Grey Havens Navigator relevance 0.55 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Mirkwood Channeler relevance 0.56 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.49 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.41 · 45.8% (93 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Bow relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (29 of 203 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.42 · 42.4% (86 of 203 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Nimrodel Watcher relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.44 · 33.5% (68 of 203 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.50 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.45 · 30.0% (61 of 203 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.41 · 40.9% (83 of 203 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (28 of 203 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.50 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.44 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.36 · 43.8% (89 of 203 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.44 · 23.6% (48 of 203 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.43 · 26.6% (54 of 203 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.44 · 23.6% (48 of 203 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.33 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (41 of 203 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.40 · 29.6% (60 of 203 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.43 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Willow-Wind relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (31 of 203 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (26 of 203 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.55 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.38 · 28.1% (57 of 203 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.42 · 17.7% (36 of 203 decks)
Card Stacks
20
Card Stacks
20Showing 1-2 of 20
Cards like Arwen Undómiel
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
70% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
54% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Archdruid
16× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
30% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.98 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Archdruid 44%
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary 20%
- Imperious Perfect 19%
- Galadhrim Brigade 12%
- Canopy Tactician 2%
Other options: Elvish Clancaller
Cards like Preordain
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
55% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Preordain 45%
- Deliberate 24%
- Serum Visions 20%
- Foresee 4%
- Tamiyo's Epiphany 2%
Other options: Scour All Possibilities, Introduction to Prophecy
Cards like Galadhrim Guide
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.73 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Galadhrim Guide 25%
- Grey Havens Navigator 22%
- Willow-Wind 10%
- Omenspeaker 4%
- Thaumaturge's Familiar 4%
- Augury Owl 2%
- Bronze Walrus 1%
- Faerie Seer 1%
- Automatic Librarian 1%
Other options: Silver Raven, Horizon Scholar, Sage's Row Savant, Chrome Cat, Octoprophet, Cloudreader Sphinx, Archive Dragon, Prophet of the Peak
Cards like Lothlórien Lookout
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
50% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.71 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards like Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
39% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Elvish Mystic
1.6× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 34% of other Simic decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 21% of other Simic decks
1.2 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elvish Mystic 51%
- Llanowar Elves 40%
- Fyndhorn Elves 16%
- Leaf Gilder 3%
- Druid of the Cowl 2%
- Lifespring Druid 1%
Other options: Boreal Druid, Fyndhorn Elder, Goobbue Gardener, Gyre Engineer, Wirewood Elf, Greenweaver Druid, Nantuko Elder, Orochi Merge-Keeper, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Skyshroud Troopers, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Shower of Arrows
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
59% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Shower of Arrows 51%
- Broken Wings 7%
- Unforgiving Aim 5%
- Plummet 2%
- Airship Crash 1%
Other options: Shattered Wings, Crushing Vines, Thornado, Atraxa's Fall, Crushing Canopy, Wing Snare, Return to the Earth, Pinion Feast, Eaten by Spiders
Cards like Decisive Denial
3.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.15 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Decisive Denial 26%
- Quandrix Charm 11%
Cards like Snakeskin Veil
4.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 15% of other Simic decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.31 per deck on average
vs. 0.17 in other Simic decks
Cards
Other options: Ranger's Guile, Woodcutter's Grit
Cards like Dissolve
12× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Simic decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.33 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Simic decks
Cards like Arcane Signet
1.8× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
60% of decks run one or more
vs. 62% of other Simic decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other Simic decks
0.68 per deck on average
vs. 0.67 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Arcane Signet 58%
- Commander's Sphere 11%
Cards like Elven Farsight
9.1× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Elven Farsight 46%
- Track Down 7%
Cards like Bushwhack
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
25% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.29 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Bushwhack 17%
- Prey Upon 7%
- Smell Fear 2%
- Savage Punch 2%
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.3× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Simic decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Simic decks
0.53 per deck on average
vs. 0.40 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 28%
- Lightning Greaves 26%
Cards like Basilisk Collar
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards like Lothlórien Blade
No other Simic decks run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. 0% of other Simic decks
0.35 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
Cards like Mithril Coat
Over 20× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Simic decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Simic decks
Cards
- Mithril Coat 20%
- Darksteel Plate 4%
Cards like Overwhelming Stampede
3.4× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Simic decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Simic decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Simic decks
Cards like Heroic Intervention
1.5× as likely as other Simic decks to run two or more
Stats
35% of decks run one or more
vs. 31% of other Simic decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Simic decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.33 in other Simic decks
Cards
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Arwen Undómiel relevance 0.49 · 60.6% (123 of 203 decks)
- Elrond, Lord of Rivendell relevance 0.47 · 62.1% (126 of 203 decks)
- Elrond, Master of Healing relevance 0.49 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Chance-Met Elves relevance 0.58 · 34.5% (70 of 203 decks)
- Lothlórien Lookout relevance 0.53 · 37.4% (76 of 203 decks)
- Glorfindel, Dauntless Rescuer relevance 0.55 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Galadriel of Lothlórien relevance 0.50 · 38.9% (79 of 203 decks)
- Celeborn the Wise relevance 0.46 · 47.3% (96 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Guide relevance 0.57 · 25.1% (51 of 203 decks)
- Legolas, Master Archer relevance 0.56 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Grey Havens Navigator relevance 0.55 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Mirkwood Channeler relevance 0.56 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Nimrodel Watcher relevance 0.52 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Mariner relevance 0.44 · 33.5% (68 of 203 decks)
- Legolas Greenleaf relevance 0.45 · 30.0% (61 of 203 decks)
- Dwynen, Gilt-Leaf Daen relevance 0.46 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Archdruid relevance 0.36 · 43.8% (89 of 203 decks)
- Matoya, Archon Elder relevance 0.44 · 23.6% (48 of 203 decks)
- Mirkwood Spider relevance 0.53 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Warmaster relevance 0.40 · 29.6% (60 of 203 decks)
- Leaf-Crowned Visionary relevance 0.44 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Willow-Wind relevance 0.52 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.38 · 28.1% (57 of 203 decks)
- Imperious Perfect relevance 0.41 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Haldir, Lórien Lieutenant relevance 0.39 · 20.7% (42 of 203 decks)
- Galadriel, Elven-Queen relevance 0.41 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Galadriel, Gift-Giver relevance 0.44 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Brigade relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Dawn's Light Archer relevance 0.46 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Ezuri, Renegade Leader relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Sigiled Starfish relevance 0.38 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Tyvar, the Pummeler relevance 0.41 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Emil, Vastlands Roamer relevance 0.35 · 15.3% (31 of 203 decks)
- Thaumaturge's Familiar relevance 0.49 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Safewright Cavalry relevance 0.45 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Ivy Lane Denizen relevance 0.36 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Thornweald Archer relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Quickbeam, Upstart Ent relevance 0.44 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Elvish Visionary relevance 0.33 · 14.8% (30 of 203 decks)
- Paradise Druid relevance 0.32 · 17.2% (35 of 203 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.31 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Mirkwood Elk relevance 0.37 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Gandalf, Friend of the Shire relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Circle of Dreams Druid relevance 0.33 · 12.8% (26 of 203 decks)
- Farhaven Elf relevance 0.31 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
- Dwynen's Elite relevance 0.38 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Marwyn, the Nurturer relevance 0.33 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Reclamation Sage relevance 0.26 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
- Wose Pathfinder relevance 0.35 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Viridian Longbow relevance 0.65 · 14.8% (30 of 203 decks)
- Lothlórien Blade relevance 0.49 · 33.5% (68 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Bow relevance 0.56 · 14.3% (29 of 203 decks)
- Goggles of Night relevance 0.54 · 13.8% (28 of 203 decks)
- Mirror of Galadriel relevance 0.44 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Mithril Coat relevance 0.44 · 20.2% (41 of 203 decks)
- Basilisk Collar relevance 0.46 · 15.3% (31 of 203 decks)
- Lembas relevance 0.47 · 12.8% (26 of 203 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Bestiary relevance 0.38 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.46 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Surestrike Trident relevance 0.49 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Seer's Lantern relevance 0.43 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Hunter's Bow relevance 0.43 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Palantír of Orthanc relevance 0.37 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Armory of Iroas relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Gorgon's Head relevance 0.44 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Inherited Envelope relevance 0.37 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- The Temporal Anchor relevance 0.34 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Haunted Cloak relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Witches' Eye relevance 0.42 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Crystal Ball relevance 0.34 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.26 · 17.2% (35 of 203 decks)
- Planetarium of Wan Shi Tong relevance 0.31 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Darksteel Plate relevance 0.34 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.31 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Barrow-Blade relevance 0.38 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Witching Well relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.23 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Herald's Horn relevance 0.25 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Champion's Helm relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.17 · 25.6% (52 of 203 decks)
- Simic Signet relevance 0.16 · 35.0% (71 of 203 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.16 · 27.6% (56 of 203 decks)
- Smuggler's Copter relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Thornbite Staff relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Simic Cluestone relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- The One Ring relevance 0.21 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Talisman of Curiosity relevance 0.16 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.29 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Phial of Galadriel relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.21 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Potioner's Trove relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Sting, the Glinting Dagger relevance 0.27 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Staff of Domination relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.16 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
Enchantments
50
Enchantments
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All enchantments (50)
- Oracle's Insight relevance 0.67 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
- Gift of Strands relevance 0.59 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Season of Growth relevance 0.42 · 42.4% (86 of 203 decks)
- Hermetic Study relevance 0.60 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.41 · 40.9% (83 of 203 decks)
- Fall of Gil-galad relevance 0.50 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Lost Isle Calling relevance 0.43 · 22.7% (46 of 203 decks)
- Psionic Gift relevance 0.55 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Psychic Impetus relevance 0.47 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
- Sylvan Anthem relevance 0.41 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
- Song of Eärendil relevance 0.40 · 19.2% (39 of 203 decks)
- Omen of the Sea relevance 0.42 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Presence of Gond relevance 0.46 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Omen of the Hunt relevance 0.44 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Zephyr Charge relevance 0.46 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Elven Chorus relevance 0.34 · 15.8% (32 of 203 decks)
- Asceticism relevance 0.33 · 17.2% (35 of 203 decks)
- Setessan Training relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Spontaneous Mutation relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Well Rested relevance 0.37 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Jace's Sanctum relevance 0.36 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Leyline Immersion relevance 0.35 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Aquitect's Defenses relevance 0.36 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- The Bath Song relevance 0.37 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Trollhide relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Claustrophobia relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Warbriar Blessing relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Snake Umbra relevance 0.31 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Hunter's Talent relevance 0.33 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Retreat to Coralhelm relevance 0.24 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
- Slimebind relevance 0.40 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Tricks of the Trade relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Scroll of Isildur relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Rancor relevance 0.28 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Cartouche of Strength relevance 0.35 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Gilt-Leaf's Embrace relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Predatory Urge relevance 0.39 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Spider Umbra relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Cradle of Safety relevance 0.35 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Verdant Haven relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Starlit Mantle relevance 0.34 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.17 · 33.0% (67 of 203 decks)
- Fae Flight relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Watery Grasp relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Pitiless Fists relevance 0.35 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Eyes Everywhere relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Ichthyomorphosis relevance 0.31 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Leyline of Abundance relevance 0.25 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Ancestral Mask relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Shower of Arrows relevance 0.52 · 50.7% (103 of 203 decks)
- Hithlain Knots relevance 0.55 · 34.5% (70 of 203 decks)
- Council's Deliberation relevance 0.50 · 21.7% (44 of 203 decks)
- Legolas's Quick Reflexes relevance 0.43 · 26.6% (54 of 203 decks)
- Deliberate relevance 0.44 · 23.6% (48 of 203 decks)
- Opt relevance 0.33 · 50.2% (102 of 203 decks)
- Bane's Contingency relevance 0.46 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Dissolve relevance 0.42 · 17.7% (36 of 203 decks)
- Bombadil's Song relevance 0.43 · 14.3% (29 of 203 decks)
- Windswift Slice relevance 0.40 · 20.7% (42 of 203 decks)
- Bite Down relevance 0.43 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Chain to Memory relevance 0.47 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Galadhrim Ambush relevance 0.37 · 19.2% (39 of 203 decks)
- Glorious Gale relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Inscription of Abundance relevance 0.36 · 15.8% (32 of 203 decks)
- Diplomatic Relations relevance 0.46 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Giant Growth relevance 0.40 · 10.3% (21 of 203 decks)
- Ram Through relevance 0.39 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Rocky Rebuke relevance 0.42 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Burrog Barrage relevance 0.41 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Cosmic Hunger relevance 0.42 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Unforgiving Aim relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Tail Swipe relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Crypsis relevance 0.41 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Dreadful as the Storm relevance 0.40 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Voyage's End relevance 0.39 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Isolation at Orthanc relevance 0.44 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Clear Shot relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Ancient Animus relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Artisan's Sorrow relevance 0.39 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Horrid Vigor relevance 0.38 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Fading Hope relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Inspire Awe relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Decisive Denial relevance 0.26 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Master's Rebuke relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Broken Wings relevance 0.35 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Hubris relevance 0.43 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Titanic Growth relevance 0.36 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Mystic Confluence relevance 0.29 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Octopus Form relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Condescend relevance 0.29 · 11.8% (24 of 203 decks)
- Behold the Multiverse relevance 0.33 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.26 · 17.7% (36 of 203 decks)
- Staggering Size relevance 0.40 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Magic Damper relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Stern Scolding relevance 0.37 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Blossoming Defense relevance 0.32 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Quick Study relevance 0.31 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Soothing of Sméagol relevance 0.32 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Contact Other Plane relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
Sorceries
50
Sorceries
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All sorceries (50)
- Arwen's Gift relevance 0.49 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
- Elven Farsight relevance 0.41 · 45.8% (93 of 203 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.31 · 45.3% (92 of 203 decks)
- Serum Visions relevance 0.37 · 20.2% (41 of 203 decks)
- Prey Upon relevance 0.45 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Bushwhack relevance 0.37 · 17.2% (35 of 203 decks)
- Horses of the Bruinen relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (21 of 203 decks)
- Rabid Bite relevance 0.43 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Animist's Might relevance 0.44 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Birthday Escape relevance 0.38 · 10.8% (22 of 203 decks)
- Ent's Fury relevance 0.41 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Raise the Palisade relevance 0.28 · 24.1% (49 of 203 decks)
- Uncage the Menagerie relevance 0.39 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Threats Undetected relevance 0.37 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Track Down relevance 0.36 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Storm the Festival relevance 0.42 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Hunt the Weak relevance 0.41 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Assert Perfection relevance 0.40 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Divination relevance 0.33 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Many Partings relevance 0.32 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Impede Momentum relevance 0.36 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Revive the Shire relevance 0.32 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Overwhelming Stampede relevance 0.23 · 26.1% (53 of 203 decks)
- Call Damage Control relevance 0.33 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Outmuscle relevance 0.39 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Feral Encounter relevance 0.37 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Oracle's Restoration relevance 0.32 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.26 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Foresee relevance 0.30 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Freeze in Place relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Mystic Speculation relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Devastation Tide relevance 0.25 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Calamitous Tide relevance 0.33 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Sift relevance 0.36 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Tooth and Nail relevance 0.26 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Anchor to Reality relevance 0.34 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Harmonize relevance 0.23 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Longstalk Brawl relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Nature's Way relevance 0.33 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Hard-Hitting Question relevance 0.32 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Horrific Assault relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Kapow! relevance 0.31 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.13 · 37.4% (76 of 203 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Synchronized Charge relevance 0.28 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Ezuri's Predation relevance 0.19 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Shared Roots relevance 0.19 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Reason // Believe relevance 0.25 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Nature's Rhythm relevance 0.18 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.26 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
Planeswalkers
2
Planeswalkers
2 
All planeswalkers (2)
- Nissa, Steward of Elements relevance 0.33 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Freyalise, Llanowar's Fury relevance 0.35 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
Utility Lands
44
Utility Lands
44 Showing 1-10 of 44
Page size
All utility lands (44)
- The Grey Havens relevance 0.44 · 38.4% (78 of 203 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.38 · 49.8% (101 of 203 decks)
- Crystal Grotto relevance 0.31 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Castle Vantress relevance 0.26 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- The Shire relevance 0.30 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Zhalfirin Void relevance 0.29 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Elvenking's Halls relevance 0.30 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.24 · 13.3% (27 of 203 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.18 · 33.5% (68 of 203 decks)
- Field of Ruin relevance 0.26 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Isolated Watchtower relevance 0.33 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Tranquil Thicket relevance 0.24 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.20 · 13.8% (28 of 203 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.23 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Quandrix Campus relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (21 of 203 decks)
- Waterlogged Grove relevance 0.16 · 19.7% (40 of 203 decks)
- Wirewood Lodge relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Paradox Gardens relevance 0.20 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.20 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.14 · 23.2% (47 of 203 decks)
- Temple of Mystery relevance 0.12 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
- Meditation Pools relevance 0.22 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Cavern of Souls relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Lumbering Falls relevance 0.18 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.15 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 11.3% (23 of 203 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.19 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.16 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.12 · 7.4% (15 of 203 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.18 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.12 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.13 · 5.9% (12 of 203 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Restless Vinestalk relevance 0.17 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.13 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.07 · 18.7% (38 of 203 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.12 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Hedge Maze relevance 0.10 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.10 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Alchemist's Refuge relevance 0.07 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
Lands
45
Lands
45 Showing 1-10 of 45
Page size
All lands (45)
- Great Hall of the Citadel relevance 0.42 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Thriving Grove relevance 0.31 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Thornwood Falls relevance 0.22 · 35.0% (71 of 203 decks)
- Woodland Stream relevance 0.28 · 12.3% (25 of 203 decks)
- Rumble Arena relevance 0.31 · 6.4% (13 of 203 decks)
- Ash Barrens relevance 0.26 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.27 · 6.9% (14 of 203 decks)
- Guadosalam, Farplane Gateway relevance 0.27 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Shire Terrace relevance 0.27 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Botanical Sanctum relevance 0.19 · 16.3% (33 of 203 decks)
- Simic Guildgate relevance 0.21 · 9.9% (20 of 203 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.17 · 24.6% (50 of 203 decks)
- Lakeside Shack relevance 0.26 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Sodden Verdure relevance 0.14 · 16.7% (34 of 203 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.13 · 23.2% (47 of 203 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.15 · 13.8% (28 of 203 decks)
- Uncharted Haven relevance 0.25 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Vineglimmer Snarl relevance 0.11 · 36.9% (75 of 203 decks)
- Lush Oasis relevance 0.19 · 3.9% (8 of 203 decks)
- Tangled Islet relevance 0.15 · 8.9% (18 of 203 decks)
- Rejuvenating Springs relevance 0.10 · 31.5% (64 of 203 decks)
- Elven Passage relevance 0.21 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Hadana's Climb // Winged Temple of Orazca relevance 0.18 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Mutant Town relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Eclipsed Realms relevance 0.20 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Flooded Grove relevance 0.09 · 31.0% (63 of 203 decks)
- Dreamroot Cascade relevance 0.09 · 32.0% (65 of 203 decks)
- Simic Growth Chamber relevance 0.10 · 22.2% (45 of 203 decks)
- Overflowing Basin relevance 0.12 · 9.4% (19 of 203 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.16 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.11 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Secluded Courtyard relevance 0.14 · 3.0% (6 of 203 decks)
- Barkchannel Pathway // Tidechannel Pathway relevance 0.11 · 4.9% (10 of 203 decks)
- Hinterland Harbor relevance 0.06 · 47.8% (97 of 203 decks)
- Tree of Tales relevance 0.15 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.10 · 5.4% (11 of 203 decks)
- Rimewood Falls relevance 0.14 · 2.5% (5 of 203 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.09 · 7.9% (16 of 203 decks)
- Willowrush Verge relevance 0.10 · 4.4% (9 of 203 decks)
- Breeding Pool relevance 0.07 · 18.2% (37 of 203 decks)
- Yavimaya Coast relevance 0.07 · 20.7% (42 of 203 decks)
- Tropical Island relevance 0.11 · 3.4% (7 of 203 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.03 · 64.5% (131 of 203 decks)
- Forest relevance 0.01 · 89.7% (182 of 203 decks)
- Island relevance 0.01 · 89.2% (181 of 203 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Legolas, Counter of Kills, from 203 real Commander decks.