Cards like Etherium Sculptor
10× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
92% of decks run one or more
vs. 13% of other Azorius decks
81% of decks run two or more
vs. 8% of other Azorius decks
2.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.25 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Other options: Stone Calendar, Mana Matrix, Planar Gate
Cards like Sai, Master Thopterist
18× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
65% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Azorius decks
28% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Azorius decks
0.93 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Thopter Spy Network
16× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
63% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Azorius decks
21% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.84 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Silver Myr
3.4× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Azorius decks
23% of decks run two or more
vs. 7% of other Azorius decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other Azorius decks
Cards like Master of Etherium
20× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Azorius decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.72 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Mystic Forge
15× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Azorius decks
12% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Simulacrum Synthesizer
Over 20× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
51% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Azorius decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Adaptive Omnitool
Over 20× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Azorius decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.44 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Azorius decks
Cards
- Adaptive Omnitool 25%
- Nettlecyst 19%
Cards like Scrap Trawler
11× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
24% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Azorius decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Diversion Unit
Over 20× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.43 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Azorius decks
Cards like Guidelight Optimizer
5.5× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Azorius decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Azorius decks
Cards
- Guidelight Optimizer 15%
- Steelswarm Operator 8%
- Oaken Siren 4%
- Vedalken Engineer 4%
- Cargo Ship 2%
- Automated Artificer 2%
Other options: Hydraulic Helper, Renowned Weaponsmith, Hargilde, Kindly Runechanter, Soldevi Machinist
Cards like Swiftfoot Boots
1.6× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 32% of other Azorius decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Azorius decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.42 in other Azorius decks
Cards
- Swiftfoot Boots 31%
- Lightning Greaves 31%
Cards like Fabricate
4.9× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
41% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Azorius decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.47 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Azorius decks
Cards
- Fabricate 32%
- Scour for Scrap 15%
Cards like Cephalopod Sentry
Over 20× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Shimmer Myr
13× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Azorius decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Steel Overseer
8.6× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Azorius decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.52 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Thran Dynamo
3.0× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
33% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Azorius decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.37 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Azorius decks
Cards
- Thran Dynamo 27%
- Hedron Archive 9%
Other options: Ring of the Lucii, Sisay's Ring, Ur-Golem's Eye, Sceptre of Eternal Glory, Ichor Elixir
Cards like Phyrexian Metamorph
11× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Azorius decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.48 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Padeem, Consul of Innovation
11× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
57% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Azorius decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.59 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Repurposing Bay
6.4× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Azorius decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.30 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Azorius decks
Cards like Master Transmuter
10.0× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Azorius decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Azorius decks
0.21 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Azorius decks
Cards
Cards like Tezzeret, Cruel Captain
2.3× as likely as other Azorius decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 5% of other Azorius decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Azorius decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other Azorius decks
Cards
All top picks (50)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.62 · 69.8% (5,212 of 7,464 decks)
- Voyage Home relevance 0.67 · 62.2% (4,646 of 7,464 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.84 · 36.7% (2,743 of 7,464 decks)
- Nesting Bot relevance 0.88 · 29.8% (2,222 of 7,464 decks)
- Bronze Guardian relevance 0.68 · 52.8% (3,942 of 7,464 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.60 · 63.7% (4,751 of 7,464 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.60 · 63.0% (4,699 of 7,464 decks)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.87 · 27.0% (2,017 of 7,464 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.71 · 45.0% (3,362 of 7,464 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.59 · 62.7% (4,677 of 7,464 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.51 · 76.0% (5,672 of 7,464 decks)
- Guidelight Synergist relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (1,754 of 7,464 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.81 · 28.5% (2,125 of 7,464 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.67 · 46.3% (3,453 of 7,464 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.84 · 23.8% (1,773 of 7,464 decks)
- Illustrious Wanderglyph relevance 0.73 · 37.1% (2,770 of 7,464 decks)
- Perilous Snare relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (1,457 of 7,464 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.68 · 42.8% (3,191 of 7,464 decks)
- Losheel, Clockwork Scholar relevance 0.69 · 41.2% (3,074 of 7,464 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.48 · 76.7% (5,728 of 7,464 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.79 · 27.4% (2,043 of 7,464 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (1,284 of 7,464 decks)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.74 · 33.1% (2,467 of 7,464 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (1,380 of 7,464 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.66 · 43.4% (3,237 of 7,464 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (1,213 of 7,464 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.65 · 44.6% (3,332 of 7,464 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.83 · 21.4% (1,597 of 7,464 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.55 · 61.4% (4,580 of 7,464 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.70 · 36.6% (2,730 of 7,464 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.78 · 24.7% (1,847 of 7,464 decks)
- Oltec Matterweaver relevance 0.81 · 21.0% (1,569 of 7,464 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.67 · 39.1% (2,920 of 7,464 decks)
- Ethersworn Sphinx relevance 0.83 · 18.0% (1,342 of 7,464 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.59 · 51.6% (3,849 of 7,464 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (1,926 of 7,464 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.56 · 55.4% (4,134 of 7,464 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.85 · 15.2% (1,134 of 7,464 decks)
- Swooping Lookout relevance 0.89 · 13.0% (969 of 7,464 decks)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.57 · 54.9% (4,097 of 7,464 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.84 · 14.9% (1,115 of 7,464 decks)
- Cephalopod Sentry relevance 0.84 · 15.5% (1,157 of 7,464 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.66 · 38.1% (2,842 of 7,464 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (2,322 of 7,464 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.56 · 52.0% (3,884 of 7,464 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.89 · 11.3% (840 of 7,464 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.81 · 15.2% (1,131 of 7,464 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.70 · 28.9% (2,160 of 7,464 decks)
- Digsite Engineer relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (1,286 of 7,464 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.85 · 12.4% (928 of 7,464 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Voyager Quickwelder relevance 0.62 · 69.8% (5,212 of 7,464 decks)
- Gingerbrute relevance 0.84 · 36.7% (2,743 of 7,464 decks)
- Nesting Bot relevance 0.88 · 29.8% (2,222 of 7,464 decks)
- Bronze Guardian relevance 0.68 · 52.8% (3,942 of 7,464 decks)
- Kappa Cannoneer relevance 0.60 · 63.7% (4,751 of 7,464 decks)
- Thought Monitor relevance 0.60 · 63.0% (4,699 of 7,464 decks)
- Steel Overseer relevance 0.71 · 45.0% (3,362 of 7,464 decks)
- Foundry Inspector relevance 0.51 · 76.0% (5,672 of 7,464 decks)
- Guidelight Synergist relevance 0.86 · 23.5% (1,754 of 7,464 decks)
- K-9, Mark I relevance 0.81 · 28.5% (2,125 of 7,464 decks)
- Master of Etherium relevance 0.67 · 46.3% (3,453 of 7,464 decks)
- Diversion Unit relevance 0.84 · 23.8% (1,773 of 7,464 decks)
- Illustrious Wanderglyph relevance 0.73 · 37.1% (2,770 of 7,464 decks)
- Vnwxt, Verbose Host relevance 0.68 · 42.8% (3,191 of 7,464 decks)
- Losheel, Clockwork Scholar relevance 0.69 · 41.2% (3,074 of 7,464 decks)
- Etherium Sculptor relevance 0.48 · 76.7% (5,728 of 7,464 decks)
- Stridehangar Automaton relevance 0.79 · 27.4% (2,043 of 7,464 decks)
- Hope of Ghirapur relevance 0.88 · 17.2% (1,284 of 7,464 decks)
- Fugitive Droid relevance 0.86 · 18.5% (1,380 of 7,464 decks)
- Cyberman Patrol relevance 0.87 · 16.3% (1,213 of 7,464 decks)
- Sai, Master Thopterist relevance 0.55 · 61.4% (4,580 of 7,464 decks)
- Oltec Matterweaver relevance 0.81 · 21.0% (1,569 of 7,464 decks)
- Ethersworn Sphinx relevance 0.83 · 18.0% (1,342 of 7,464 decks)
- Padeem, Consul of Innovation relevance 0.56 · 55.4% (4,134 of 7,464 decks)
- Guidelight Optimizer relevance 0.85 · 15.2% (1,134 of 7,464 decks)
- Swooping Lookout relevance 0.89 · 13.0% (969 of 7,464 decks)
- Cephalopod Sentry relevance 0.84 · 15.5% (1,157 of 7,464 decks)
- Cyberdrive Awakener relevance 0.56 · 52.0% (3,884 of 7,464 decks)
- Chief of the Foundry relevance 0.81 · 15.2% (1,131 of 7,464 decks)
- Research Thief relevance 0.70 · 28.9% (2,160 of 7,464 decks)
- Digsite Engineer relevance 0.78 · 17.2% (1,286 of 7,464 decks)
- Memory Guardian relevance 0.89 · 10.5% (782 of 7,464 decks)
- Skrelv, Defector Mite relevance 0.75 · 21.4% (1,600 of 7,464 decks)
- Cybermen Squadron relevance 0.84 · 12.8% (952 of 7,464 decks)
- Vedalken Archmage relevance 0.75 · 21.2% (1,582 of 7,464 decks)
- Jhoira's Familiar relevance 0.71 · 24.9% (1,859 of 7,464 decks)
- Forensic Gadgeteer relevance 0.69 · 25.7% (1,919 of 7,464 decks)
- Scrap Trawler relevance 0.77 · 15.2% (1,136 of 7,464 decks)
- Emry, Lurker of the Loch relevance 0.52 · 52.1% (3,891 of 7,464 decks)
- Silver Raven relevance 0.74 · 16.1% (1,202 of 7,464 decks)
- Ethersworn Canonist relevance 0.71 · 18.8% (1,403 of 7,464 decks)
- Network Disruptor relevance 0.88 · 7.6% (566 of 7,464 decks)
- Myr Battlesphere relevance 0.72 · 17.2% (1,287 of 7,464 decks)
- Master Transmuter relevance 0.73 · 15.6% (1,163 of 7,464 decks)
- Shimmer Myr relevance 0.67 · 23.1% (1,727 of 7,464 decks)
- Mm'menon, the Right Hand relevance 0.80 · 10.9% (817 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza, Prince of Kroog relevance 0.71 · 15.8% (1,177 of 7,464 decks)
- Wurmcoil Engine relevance 0.80 · 10.6% (794 of 7,464 decks)
- Artificer's Assistant relevance 0.69 · 18.2% (1,356 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza, Lord High Artificer relevance 0.58 · 34.4% (2,567 of 7,464 decks)
All artifacts (50)
- Racers' Scoreboard relevance 0.87 · 27.0% (2,017 of 7,464 decks)
- Perilous Snare relevance 0.87 · 19.5% (1,457 of 7,464 decks)
- Simulacrum Synthesizer relevance 0.66 · 43.4% (3,237 of 7,464 decks)
- Mystic Forge relevance 0.65 · 44.6% (3,332 of 7,464 decks)
- Worldwalker Helm relevance 0.83 · 21.4% (1,597 of 7,464 decks)
- Uthros Research Craft relevance 0.70 · 36.6% (2,730 of 7,464 decks)
- Adaptive Omnitool relevance 0.78 · 24.7% (1,847 of 7,464 decks)
- Sculpting Steel relevance 0.67 · 39.1% (2,920 of 7,464 decks)
- Repurposing Bay relevance 0.77 · 25.8% (1,926 of 7,464 decks)
- Cloud Key relevance 0.66 · 38.1% (2,842 of 7,464 decks)
- Twinning Staff relevance 0.89 · 11.3% (840 of 7,464 decks)
- Nettlecyst relevance 0.75 · 19.0% (1,421 of 7,464 decks)
- Starting Column relevance 0.90 · 8.6% (645 of 7,464 decks)
- Guidelight Pathmaker relevance 0.72 · 21.7% (1,617 of 7,464 decks)
- Salvation Engine relevance 0.62 · 32.5% (2,425 of 7,464 decks)
- Crystal Skull, Isu Spyglass relevance 0.69 · 18.4% (1,376 of 7,464 decks)
- Darksteel Forge relevance 0.73 · 13.9% (1,037 of 7,464 decks)
- Mirrorworks relevance 0.82 · 6.9% (512 of 7,464 decks)
- Fabrication Foundry relevance 0.81 · 7.1% (533 of 7,464 decks)
- Aether Syphon relevance 0.79 · 7.2% (538 of 7,464 decks)
- Krark-Clan Ironworks relevance 0.79 · 5.9% (442 of 7,464 decks)
- Hulldrifter relevance 0.76 · 6.1% (455 of 7,464 decks)
- Unwinding Clock relevance 0.51 · 31.5% (2,354 of 7,464 decks)
- Machinist's Arsenal relevance 0.72 · 7.2% (541 of 7,464 decks)
- Thran Dynamo relevance 0.52 · 26.9% (2,007 of 7,464 decks)
- Retrofitter Foundry relevance 0.80 · 4.6% (342 of 7,464 decks)
- Assimilation Aegis relevance 0.72 · 6.0% (447 of 7,464 decks)
- Portal to Phyrexia relevance 0.69 · 7.5% (560 of 7,464 decks)
- Semblance Anvil relevance 0.73 · 5.0% (372 of 7,464 decks)
- The Mightstone and Weakstone relevance 0.60 · 13.2% (985 of 7,464 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.69 · 6.1% (457 of 7,464 decks)
- Radiant Lotus relevance 0.86 · 3.7% (279 of 7,464 decks)
- Brotherhood Regalia relevance 0.69 · 5.8% (436 of 7,464 decks)
- The Eternity Elevator relevance 0.67 · 5.9% (440 of 7,464 decks)
- Thopter Fabricator relevance 0.58 · 11.1% (825 of 7,464 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.66 · 5.3% (398 of 7,464 decks)
- Sensei's Divining Top relevance 0.52 · 16.2% (1,206 of 7,464 decks)
- Shadowspear relevance 0.63 · 7.0% (522 of 7,464 decks)
- Whispersilk Cloak relevance 0.62 · 7.2% (538 of 7,464 decks)
- Hedron Archive relevance 0.60 · 8.6% (642 of 7,464 decks)
- Sonic Screwdriver relevance 0.63 · 6.3% (468 of 7,464 decks)
- Trailblazer's Boots relevance 0.71 · 4.3% (324 of 7,464 decks)
- Manifold Key relevance 0.54 · 12.5% (933 of 7,464 decks)
- Shorikai, Genesis Engine relevance 0.54 · 11.9% (891 of 7,464 decks)
- Encroaching Mycosynth relevance 0.67 · 4.7% (348 of 7,464 decks)
- Scourglass relevance 0.81 · 3.5% (262 of 7,464 decks)
- Celestial Armor relevance 0.68 · 4.6% (341 of 7,464 decks)
- Forsaken Monument relevance 0.73 · 4.1% (308 of 7,464 decks)
- Voyager Glidecar relevance 0.80 · 3.5% (261 of 7,464 decks)
- Brotherhood Vertibird relevance 0.65 · 4.7% (352 of 7,464 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All enchantments (18)
- Thopter Spy Network relevance 0.57 · 54.9% (4,097 of 7,464 decks)
- Efficient Construction relevance 0.70 · 31.1% (2,322 of 7,464 decks)
- Mechanized Production relevance 0.64 · 35.1% (2,622 of 7,464 decks)
- Artificer Class relevance 0.73 · 13.7% (1,020 of 7,464 decks)
- Lightwheel Enhancements relevance 0.86 · 4.8% (360 of 7,464 decks)
- Tempered Steel relevance 0.73 · 10.5% (782 of 7,464 decks)
- Mirrodin Besieged relevance 0.70 · 10.6% (788 of 7,464 decks)
- Fateful Discovery relevance 0.76 · 4.9% (366 of 7,464 decks)
- Moonlit Meditation relevance 0.67 · 6.2% (464 of 7,464 decks)
- Unstoppable Plan relevance 0.54 · 14.6% (1,090 of 7,464 decks)
- All That Glitters relevance 0.55 · 7.2% (541 of 7,464 decks)
- Smothering Tithe relevance 0.29 · 18.1% (1,349 of 7,464 decks)
- Anointed Procession relevance 0.46 · 3.5% (263 of 7,464 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.28 · 11.5% (862 of 7,464 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.29 · 5.7% (426 of 7,464 decks)
- Aqueous Form relevance 0.42 · 2.5% (190 of 7,464 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.23 · 9.3% (691 of 7,464 decks)
- Ghostly Prison relevance 0.23 · 5.5% (411 of 7,464 decks)
All instants (44)
- Desynchronization relevance 0.74 · 33.1% (2,467 of 7,464 decks)
- Reality Heist relevance 0.85 · 12.4% (928 of 7,464 decks)
- Dispatch relevance 0.50 · 61.2% (4,570 of 7,464 decks)
- Masterful Replication relevance 0.84 · 6.9% (512 of 7,464 decks)
- Spectral Interference relevance 0.83 · 4.9% (364 of 7,464 decks)
- Scour for Scrap relevance 0.64 · 15.3% (1,139 of 7,464 decks)
- Whir of Invention relevance 0.57 · 15.7% (1,171 of 7,464 decks)
- Bounce Off relevance 0.78 · 4.5% (335 of 7,464 decks)
- Thirst for Knowledge relevance 0.66 · 8.1% (603 of 7,464 decks)
- Stoic Rebuttal relevance 0.74 · 4.4% (331 of 7,464 decks)
- Access Denied relevance 0.62 · 6.0% (446 of 7,464 decks)
- Three Steps Ahead relevance 0.55 · 10.2% (764 of 7,464 decks)
- Metallic Rebuke relevance 0.78 · 2.9% (217 of 7,464 decks)
- Disruption Protocol relevance 0.66 · 3.7% (273 of 7,464 decks)
- Spell Pierce relevance 0.50 · 5.4% (401 of 7,464 decks)
- Dawn's Truce relevance 0.44 · 8.4% (626 of 7,464 decks)
- Enlightened Tutor relevance 0.34 · 18.2% (1,362 of 7,464 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.43 · 5.3% (399 of 7,464 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.36 · 10.3% (772 of 7,464 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.33 · 12.3% (918 of 7,464 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.39 · 5.6% (417 of 7,464 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.58 · 2.6% (192 of 7,464 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.34 · 10.2% (761 of 7,464 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.30 · 15.6% (1,165 of 7,464 decks)
- Teferi's Protection relevance 0.34 · 8.8% (658 of 7,464 decks)
- Hindering Light relevance 0.49 · 3.3% (248 of 7,464 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.26 · 26.4% (1,969 of 7,464 decks)
- Flawless Maneuver relevance 0.40 · 4.4% (328 of 7,464 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.27 · 19.1% (1,424 of 7,464 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.30 · 12.4% (923 of 7,464 decks)
- Clever Concealment relevance 0.45 · 3.4% (251 of 7,464 decks)
- Negate relevance 0.26 · 19.7% (1,472 of 7,464 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.26 · 17.7% (1,324 of 7,464 decks)
- Akroma's Will relevance 0.39 · 3.6% (267 of 7,464 decks)
- Dovin's Veto relevance 0.20 · 32.9% (2,452 of 7,464 decks)
- Disenchant relevance 0.40 · 3.3% (244 of 7,464 decks)
- Dramatic Reversal relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (253 of 7,464 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (305 of 7,464 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.36 · 3.4% (251 of 7,464 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.39 · 2.7% (202 of 7,464 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.15 · 48.4% (3,609 of 7,464 decks)
- Counterspell relevance 0.15 · 46.8% (3,490 of 7,464 decks)
- Brainstorm relevance 0.26 · 4.6% (343 of 7,464 decks)
- Swords to Plowshares relevance 0.10 · 61.7% (4,603 of 7,464 decks)
All sorceries (25)
- Voyage Home relevance 0.67 · 62.2% (4,646 of 7,464 decks)
- Organic Extinction relevance 0.59 · 62.7% (4,677 of 7,464 decks)
- Thoughtcast relevance 0.59 · 51.6% (3,849 of 7,464 decks)
- March of Progress relevance 0.84 · 14.9% (1,115 of 7,464 decks)
- One with the Machine relevance 0.78 · 10.3% (769 of 7,464 decks)
- Tune Up relevance 0.76 · 6.1% (457 of 7,464 decks)
- Dance of the Manse relevance 0.58 · 19.9% (1,487 of 7,464 decks)
- Brilliant Restoration relevance 0.63 · 11.0% (820 of 7,464 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.46 · 31.8% (2,376 of 7,464 decks)
- Redress Fate relevance 0.77 · 4.3% (318 of 7,464 decks)
- Enter the Enigma relevance 0.64 · 5.9% (443 of 7,464 decks)
- Season of Weaving relevance 0.69 · 4.4% (329 of 7,464 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.55 · 8.8% (654 of 7,464 decks)
- Reverse Engineer relevance 0.76 · 3.5% (260 of 7,464 decks)
- Slip Through Space relevance 0.65 · 3.8% (287 of 7,464 decks)
- Open the Vaults relevance 0.69 · 3.0% (226 of 7,464 decks)
- Rise and Shine relevance 0.65 · 2.7% (202 of 7,464 decks)
- Universal Surveillance relevance 0.64 · 2.6% (196 of 7,464 decks)
- Reshape relevance 0.58 · 3.2% (237 of 7,464 decks)
- Sevinne's Reclamation relevance 0.42 · 4.5% (339 of 7,464 decks)
- Austere Command relevance 0.35 · 7.3% (546 of 7,464 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.33 · 5.7% (423 of 7,464 decks)
- Supreme Verdict relevance 0.25 · 12.2% (909 of 7,464 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.30 · 3.0% (221 of 7,464 decks)
- Time Wipe relevance 0.31 · 2.8% (206 of 7,464 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (6)
- Tezzeret, Cruel Captain relevance 0.65 · 15.5% (1,158 of 7,464 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.78 · 7.2% (536 of 7,464 decks)
- Tezzeret, Artifice Master relevance 0.73 · 6.6% (490 of 7,464 decks)
- Tezzeret the Seeker relevance 0.55 · 6.1% (455 of 7,464 decks)
- Ugin, Eye of the Storms relevance 0.67 · 2.8% (206 of 7,464 decks)
- Tezzeret, Betrayer of Flesh relevance 0.55 · 3.4% (254 of 7,464 decks)
All utility lands (32)
- Amonkhet Raceway relevance 0.78 · 43.4% (3,241 of 7,464 decks)
- Avishkar Raceway relevance 0.84 · 22.7% (1,692 of 7,464 decks)
- Archway of Innovation relevance 0.59 · 41.9% (3,128 of 7,464 decks)
- Power Depot relevance 0.76 · 15.5% (1,155 of 7,464 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.61 · 35.4% (2,644 of 7,464 decks)
- Treasure Vault relevance 0.70 · 19.0% (1,420 of 7,464 decks)
- The Mycosynth Gardens relevance 0.69 · 18.5% (1,384 of 7,464 decks)
- Sunscorched Desert relevance 0.87 · 6.1% (454 of 7,464 decks)
- Fomori Vault relevance 0.72 · 12.5% (936 of 7,464 decks)
- Buried Ruin relevance 0.55 · 30.8% (2,296 of 7,464 decks)
- Secluded Starforge relevance 0.78 · 6.4% (478 of 7,464 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.52 · 33.6% (2,509 of 7,464 decks)
- Scene of the Crime relevance 0.74 · 5.9% (438 of 7,464 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.45 · 41.4% (3,091 of 7,464 decks)
- Adagia, Windswept Bastion relevance 0.59 · 12.5% (935 of 7,464 decks)
- Monumental Henge relevance 0.63 · 9.7% (723 of 7,464 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.41 · 27.9% (2,086 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.43 · 21.5% (1,604 of 7,464 decks)
- Reef Roads relevance 0.63 · 3.2% (240 of 7,464 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.35 · 12.6% (944 of 7,464 decks)
- Country Roads relevance 0.60 · 2.7% (202 of 7,464 decks)
- Ishgard, the Holy See // Faith & Grief relevance 0.51 · 3.6% (269 of 7,464 decks)
- Eiganjo, Seat of the Empire relevance 0.38 · 7.1% (532 of 7,464 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.31 · 15.1% (1,127 of 7,464 decks)
- Meticulous Archive relevance 0.30 · 12.6% (937 of 7,464 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.33 · 6.9% (514 of 7,464 decks)
- Irrigated Farmland relevance 0.30 · 10.4% (775 of 7,464 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.32 · 7.1% (529 of 7,464 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.34 · 4.9% (363 of 7,464 decks)
- Temple of Enlightenment relevance 0.22 · 22.1% (1,650 of 7,464 decks)
- Restless Anchorage relevance 0.40 · 2.8% (208 of 7,464 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.17 · 28.6% (2,136 of 7,464 decks)
All lands (49)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.73 · 64.1% (4,781 of 7,464 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.44 · 75.3% (5,622 of 7,464 decks)
- Ancient Den relevance 0.45 · 71.9% (5,363 of 7,464 decks)
- Darksteel Citadel relevance 0.54 · 53.7% (4,005 of 7,464 decks)
- Thousand Moons Smithy // Barracks of the Thousand relevance 0.68 · 29.8% (2,223 of 7,464 decks)
- Razortide Bridge relevance 0.48 · 60.7% (4,527 of 7,464 decks)
- Lonely Arroyo relevance 0.66 · 18.1% (1,353 of 7,464 decks)
- Spire of Industry relevance 0.54 · 24.0% (1,789 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza's Power Plant relevance 0.69 · 6.0% (448 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza's Tower relevance 0.68 · 6.0% (449 of 7,464 decks)
- Urza's Mine relevance 0.68 · 5.9% (440 of 7,464 decks)
- Glimmervoid relevance 0.73 · 2.7% (204 of 7,464 decks)
- Seachrome Coast relevance 0.34 · 17.8% (1,329 of 7,464 decks)
- Hengegate Pathway // Mistgate Pathway relevance 0.32 · 17.7% (1,319 of 7,464 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.40 · 6.1% (457 of 7,464 decks)
- Tranquil Cove relevance 0.33 · 13.7% (1,019 of 7,464 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.36 · 10.2% (761 of 7,464 decks)
- Floodfarm Verge relevance 0.27 · 30.5% (2,279 of 7,464 decks)
- Tundra relevance 0.35 · 9.0% (672 of 7,464 decks)
- Exotic Orchard relevance 0.27 · 23.3% (1,740 of 7,464 decks)
- Mystic Gate relevance 0.27 · 19.8% (1,480 of 7,464 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.40 · 4.3% (321 of 7,464 decks)
- Skycloud Expanse relevance 0.23 · 33.8% (2,523 of 7,464 decks)
- Thriving Isle relevance 0.50 · 2.8% (212 of 7,464 decks)
- Azorius Guildgate relevance 0.43 · 3.6% (270 of 7,464 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.23 · 27.6% (2,061 of 7,464 decks)
- Gleaming Bastion relevance 0.42 · 3.5% (262 of 7,464 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.41 · 3.4% (254 of 7,464 decks)
- Sea of Clouds relevance 0.21 · 30.6% (2,285 of 7,464 decks)
- City of Brass relevance 0.43 · 2.9% (220 of 7,464 decks)
- Nimbus Maze relevance 0.28 · 9.3% (697 of 7,464 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.37 · 3.8% (284 of 7,464 decks)
- Deserted Beach relevance 0.20 · 32.9% (2,457 of 7,464 decks)
- Azorius Chancery relevance 0.23 · 17.3% (1,292 of 7,464 decks)
- Adarkar Wastes relevance 0.17 · 48.4% (3,611 of 7,464 decks)
- Idyllic Beachfront relevance 0.40 · 3.1% (234 of 7,464 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.35 · 3.9% (292 of 7,464 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (241 of 7,464 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.38 · 3.2% (238 of 7,464 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.41 · 2.7% (200 of 7,464 decks)
- Port Town relevance 0.18 · 30.9% (2,305 of 7,464 decks)
- Hallowed Fountain relevance 0.15 · 44.5% (3,318 of 7,464 decks)
- Arid Mesa relevance 0.39 · 2.6% (195 of 7,464 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.37 · 2.8% (207 of 7,464 decks)
- Glacial Fortress relevance 0.11 · 59.8% (4,461 of 7,464 decks)
- Prairie Stream relevance 0.11 · 49.2% (3,670 of 7,464 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.05 · 79.2% (5,912 of 7,464 decks)
- Plains relevance 0.03 · 91.7% (6,844 of 7,464 decks)
- Island relevance 0.03 · 92.9% (6,936 of 7,464 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Mendicant Core, Guidelight, from 7,464 real Commander decks.