Top Picks
50
Top Picks
50Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All top picks (50)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.57 · 67.4% (124 of 184 decks)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.57 · 63.0% (116 of 184 decks)
- Diamond Knight relevance 0.72 · 38.6% (71 of 184 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.61 · 50.0% (92 of 184 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.71 · 35.3% (65 of 184 decks)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.47 · 72.8% (134 of 184 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.44 · 76.6% (141 of 184 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 0.53 · 59.2% (109 of 184 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.45 · 74.5% (137 of 184 decks)
- Zephyr Singer relevance 0.67 · 31.0% (57 of 184 decks)
- Drillworks Mole relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (46 of 184 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.63 · 33.7% (62 of 184 decks)
- Thopter Mechanic relevance 0.60 · 35.3% (65 of 184 decks)
- Saiba Cryptomancer relevance 0.61 · 31.5% (58 of 184 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.54 · 42.9% (79 of 184 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.53 · 44.6% (82 of 184 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.41 · 69.0% (127 of 184 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.53 · 35.9% (66 of 184 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.56 · 28.3% (52 of 184 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 0.56 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.33 · 79.3% (146 of 184 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (115 of 184 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.47 · 41.3% (76 of 184 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (33 of 184 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.43 · 47.8% (88 of 184 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.40 · 53.8% (99 of 184 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (41 of 184 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.38 · 57.6% (106 of 184 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.41 · 50.0% (92 of 184 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.42 · 45.7% (84 of 184 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 54.9% (101 of 184 decks)
- Razzle-Dazzler relevance 0.55 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.35 · 60.9% (112 of 184 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 27.2% (50 of 184 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.34 · 62.5% (115 of 184 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.41 · 43.5% (80 of 184 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.27 · 83.2% (153 of 184 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.46 · 32.1% (59 of 184 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.52 · 18.5% (34 of 184 decks)
- Knowledge Seeker relevance 0.49 · 23.9% (44 of 184 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.39 · 45.7% (84 of 184 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.51 · 19.6% (36 of 184 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.40 · 42.9% (79 of 184 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.47 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.34 · 58.2% (107 of 184 decks)
- Recon Craft Theta relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.37 · 46.7% (86 of 184 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.46 · 26.1% (48 of 184 decks)
Card Stacks
19
Card Stacks
19Showing 1-2 of 19
Cards like Proft's Eidetic Memory
12× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
90% of decks run one or more
vs. 19% of other blue decks
63% of decks run two or more
vs. 5% of other blue decks
1.5 per deck on average
vs. 0.24 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Dreamtide Whale
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
84% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other blue decks
55% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.4 per deck on average
vs. 0.08 in other blue decks
Cards
- Dreamtide Whale 77%
- Flux Channeler 63%
Cards like Lyla, Holographic Assistant
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
86% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other blue decks
53% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1.9 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Faerie Vandal
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
68% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
45% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
1.6 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other blue decks
Cards
- Faerie Vandal 59%
- Thopter Mechanic 35%
- Knowledge Seeker 24%
- Erudite Wizard 14%
- Kid Loki 13%
- Knights of Dol Amroth 7%
- Lat-Nam Adept 5%
- Lakeshore Apothecary 3%
- Atlantean Cavalry 2%
Other options: Blue Marvel, Adam Brashear, Otter-Penguin
Cards like Thrummingbird
18× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
71% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
24% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.95 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Glen Elendra Guardian
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.67 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Thought Vessel
2.5× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
78% of decks run one or more
vs. 51% of other blue decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other blue decks
1.1 per deck on average
vs. 0.63 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Hangarback Walker
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
47% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.61 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Baxter, Fly in the Ointment
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
49% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Contentious Plan
7.8× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other blue decks
14% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.58 per deck on average
vs. 0.06 in other blue decks
Cards like Pongify
1.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
53% of decks run one or more
vs. 44% of other blue decks
34% of decks run two or more
vs. 25% of other blue decks
0.88 per deck on average
vs. 0.69 in other blue decks
Cards
- Pongify 45%
- Rapid Hybridization 43%
Cards like Reject Imperfection
6.4× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
0.34 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other blue decks
Cards
Other options: Convolute, Out of Bounds, Frazzle, Mindstatic, Thoughtbind
Cards like Silver Myr
3.0× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
28% of decks run one or more
vs. 12% of other blue decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other blue decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.16 in other blue decks
Cards
- Silver Myr 26%
- Plague Myr 5%
- Myr Convert 3%
- Hedron Crawler 2%
- Manakin 2%
Cards like Skatewing Spy
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.00 in other blue decks
Cards
- Skatewing Spy 35%
- Sapphire Drake 4%
Cards like Razzle-Dazzler
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
18% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards like Power Conduit
8.3× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.25 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other blue decks
Cards
- Power Conduit 17%
- Moxite Refinery 3%
- Coretapper 3%
- Energy Chamber 2%
Cards like Stonecoil Serpent
10× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
20% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other blue decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Stubborn Denial
Over 20× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
22% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.23 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other blue decks
Cards
Cards like Andúril, Narsil Reforged
19× as likely as other blue decks to run two or more
Stats
34% of decks run one or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other blue decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other blue decks
Creatures
50
Creatures
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All creatures (50)
- Herald of Secret Streams relevance 0.57 · 63.0% (116 of 184 decks)
- Diamond Knight relevance 0.72 · 38.6% (71 of 184 decks)
- Rikku, Resourceful Guardian relevance 0.61 · 50.0% (92 of 184 decks)
- Skatewing Spy relevance 0.71 · 35.3% (65 of 184 decks)
- Dreamtide Whale relevance 0.44 · 76.6% (141 of 184 decks)
- Faerie Vandal relevance 0.53 · 59.2% (109 of 184 decks)
- Lyla, Holographic Assistant relevance 0.45 · 74.5% (137 of 184 decks)
- Zephyr Singer relevance 0.67 · 31.0% (57 of 184 decks)
- Drillworks Mole relevance 0.70 · 25.0% (46 of 184 decks)
- Thopter Mechanic relevance 0.60 · 35.3% (65 of 184 decks)
- Saiba Cryptomancer relevance 0.61 · 31.5% (58 of 184 decks)
- Benthic Biomancer relevance 0.54 · 42.9% (79 of 184 decks)
- Baxter, Fly in the Ointment relevance 0.53 · 44.6% (82 of 184 decks)
- Thrummingbird relevance 0.41 · 69.0% (127 of 184 decks)
- Glen Elendra Guardian relevance 0.53 · 35.9% (66 of 184 decks)
- Ray Fillet, Wave Warrior relevance 0.56 · 28.3% (52 of 184 decks)
- Cosi's Trickster relevance 0.56 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Flux Channeler relevance 0.38 · 62.5% (115 of 184 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.59 · 17.9% (33 of 184 decks)
- Pollywog Prodigy relevance 0.43 · 47.8% (88 of 184 decks)
- Oneirophage relevance 0.40 · 53.8% (99 of 184 decks)
- Crystalline Crawler relevance 0.55 · 22.3% (41 of 184 decks)
- Toothy, Imaginary Friend relevance 0.41 · 50.0% (92 of 184 decks)
- Simic Manipulator relevance 0.55 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Malcolm, Alluring Scoundrel relevance 0.38 · 54.9% (101 of 184 decks)
- Razzle-Dazzler relevance 0.55 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Nardole, Resourceful Cyborg relevance 0.54 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Ledger Shredder relevance 0.35 · 60.9% (112 of 184 decks)
- Ingenious Prodigy relevance 0.49 · 27.2% (50 of 184 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.41 · 43.5% (80 of 184 decks)
- Chasm Skulker relevance 0.27 · 83.2% (153 of 184 decks)
- Goldberry, River-Daughter relevance 0.52 · 18.5% (34 of 184 decks)
- Knowledge Seeker relevance 0.49 · 23.9% (44 of 184 decks)
- Cryptic Trilobite relevance 0.51 · 19.6% (36 of 184 decks)
- Clinquant Skymage relevance 0.40 · 42.9% (79 of 184 decks)
- Twenty-Toed Toad relevance 0.34 · 58.2% (107 of 184 decks)
- Nadir Kraken relevance 0.37 · 46.7% (86 of 184 decks)
- Irma, Part-Time Mutant relevance 0.41 · 34.8% (64 of 184 decks)
- Crystalline Giant relevance 0.52 · 13.6% (25 of 184 decks)
- Pensive Professor relevance 0.44 · 26.1% (48 of 184 decks)
- Tekuthal, Inquiry Dominus relevance 0.41 · 33.2% (61 of 184 decks)
- Guildpact Informant relevance 0.44 · 25.0% (46 of 184 decks)
- Iron Man, Armored Avenger relevance 0.46 · 17.9% (33 of 184 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.45 · 17.9% (33 of 184 decks)
- Cloudfin Raptor relevance 0.45 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Stonecoil Serpent relevance 0.43 · 19.6% (36 of 184 decks)
- Chronomaton relevance 0.53 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Kid Loki relevance 0.46 · 13.0% (24 of 184 decks)
- Loch Mare relevance 0.44 · 14.7% (27 of 184 decks)
- Hexavus relevance 0.49 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
Artifacts
50
Artifacts
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All artifacts (50)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.63 · 33.7% (62 of 184 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.47 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Recon Craft Theta relevance 0.51 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Astrologian's Planisphere relevance 0.46 · 26.1% (48 of 184 decks)
- Power Conduit relevance 0.50 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.47 · 17.9% (33 of 184 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.44 · 20.7% (38 of 184 decks)
- Blitzball Stadium relevance 0.47 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Astral Cornucopia relevance 0.38 · 29.3% (54 of 184 decks)
- Staff of Compleation relevance 0.41 · 21.7% (40 of 184 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.42 · 15.2% (28 of 184 decks)
- Ring of Evos Isle relevance 0.43 · 13.0% (24 of 184 decks)
- Blade of the Bloodchief relevance 0.45 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Everflowing Chalice relevance 0.23 · 53.3% (98 of 184 decks)
- Arcade Cabinet relevance 0.41 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Tarrian's Soulcleaver relevance 0.38 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
- Lost Jitte relevance 0.40 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.39 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Contagion Clasp relevance 0.35 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
- Pip-Boy 3000 relevance 0.36 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Contagion Engine relevance 0.33 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Decanter of Endless Water relevance 0.24 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- Winged Boots relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Replicating Ring relevance 0.28 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Sceptre of Eternal Glory relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 27.2% (50 of 184 decks)
- Wayfarer's Bauble relevance 0.19 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Liquimetal Torque relevance 0.22 · 9.8% (18 of 184 decks)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.10 · 73.9% (136 of 184 decks)
- Sky Diamond relevance 0.16 · 20.1% (37 of 184 decks)
- Throne of Eldraine relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Empowered Autogenerator relevance 0.24 · 3.8% (7 of 184 decks)
- Sword of the Animist relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Waterbending Scroll relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Throne of Geth relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Spellbook relevance 0.19 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Midnight Clock relevance 0.16 · 13.6% (25 of 184 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.14 · 23.4% (43 of 184 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.14 · 22.8% (42 of 184 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.13 · 32.6% (60 of 184 decks)
- Moxite Refinery relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Insight Engine relevance 0.18 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Glistening Sphere relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Mana Vault relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Energy Chamber relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Conformer Shuriken relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Bitterthorn, Nissa's Animus relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Sapphire Medallion relevance 0.08 · 69.6% (128 of 184 decks)
- Mox Opal relevance 0.16 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
Enchantments
25
Enchantments
25 Showing 1-10 of 25
Page size
All enchantments (25)
- Proft's Eidetic Memory relevance 0.33 · 79.3% (146 of 184 decks)
- Inexorable Tide relevance 0.39 · 45.7% (84 of 184 decks)
- Wizard Class relevance 0.24 · 73.4% (135 of 184 decks)
- Ominous Seas relevance 0.24 · 29.3% (54 of 184 decks)
- Mesmerizing Dose relevance 0.33 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Nerd Rage relevance 0.29 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Stark's Ingenuity relevance 0.32 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- As Foretold relevance 0.26 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Teferi's Ageless Insight relevance 0.18 · 22.8% (42 of 184 decks)
- Amphibian Downpour relevance 0.22 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
- Ordeal of Thassa relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Leyline of Anticipation relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Dress Down relevance 0.21 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Imprisoned in the Moon relevance 0.16 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Mystic Remora relevance 0.12 · 15.2% (28 of 184 decks)
- Rhystic Study relevance 0.11 · 13.6% (25 of 184 decks)
- Waterbender Ascension relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Witness Protection relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Archmage Ascension relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Propaganda relevance 0.10 · 11.4% (21 of 184 decks)
- Back to Basics relevance 0.14 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Reconnaissance Mission relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Psychic Corrosion relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Sphinx's Tutelage relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Omniscience relevance 0.11 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
Instants
50
Instants
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All instants (50)
- Ripples of Potential relevance 0.47 · 72.8% (134 of 184 decks)
- Lazotep Plating relevance 0.47 · 41.3% (76 of 184 decks)
- Experimental Augury relevance 0.38 · 57.6% (106 of 184 decks)
- Serum Snare relevance 0.42 · 45.7% (84 of 184 decks)
- Slip Out the Back relevance 0.34 · 62.5% (115 of 184 decks)
- Essence Capture relevance 0.46 · 32.1% (59 of 184 decks)
- Change of Plans relevance 0.46 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Reject Imperfection relevance 0.39 · 24.5% (45 of 184 decks)
- Reverse the Polarity relevance 0.39 · 16.3% (30 of 184 decks)
- Stubborn Denial relevance 0.37 · 20.1% (37 of 184 decks)
- Steady Progress relevance 0.37 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Unity of Purpose relevance 0.45 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Radstorm relevance 0.36 · 15.2% (28 of 184 decks)
- Saruman's Trickery relevance 0.40 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
- Fractal Anomaly relevance 0.38 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Fuel for the Cause relevance 0.33 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
- Cyber Conversion relevance 0.29 · 10.3% (19 of 184 decks)
- Wild Unraveling relevance 0.31 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- March of Swirling Mist relevance 0.24 · 15.2% (28 of 184 decks)
- Prologue to Phyresis relevance 0.27 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Teferi's Time Twist relevance 0.24 · 10.9% (20 of 184 decks)
- Resculpt relevance 0.19 · 22.3% (41 of 184 decks)
- Flare of Denial relevance 0.22 · 12.5% (23 of 184 decks)
- Planar Incision relevance 0.23 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
- Reality Shift relevance 0.16 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Rapid Hybridization relevance 0.13 · 42.9% (79 of 184 decks)
- Foil relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Snapback relevance 0.22 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Spectral Denial relevance 0.29 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Commandeer relevance 0.20 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Misdirection relevance 0.20 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Delay relevance 0.21 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Unstable Experiment relevance 0.25 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Pongify relevance 0.12 · 44.6% (82 of 184 decks)
- Arcane Denial relevance 0.12 · 39.1% (72 of 184 decks)
- Into the Flood Maw relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Strix Serenade relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Mana Drain relevance 0.14 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Cyclonic Rift relevance 0.13 · 24.5% (45 of 184 decks)
- Swan Song relevance 0.13 · 22.3% (41 of 184 decks)
- Force of Will relevance 0.15 · 11.4% (21 of 184 decks)
- Nexus Mentality relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Zimone's Hypothesis relevance 0.25 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- An Offer You Can't Refuse relevance 0.11 · 32.1% (59 of 184 decks)
- Aetherspouts relevance 0.16 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Narset's Reversal relevance 0.15 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Fierce Guardianship relevance 0.13 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Aetherize relevance 0.12 · 19.0% (35 of 184 decks)
- Dispel relevance 0.15 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Flusterstorm relevance 0.14 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
Sorceries
20
Sorceries
20 Showing 1-10 of 20
Page size
All sorceries (20)
- Wave Goodbye relevance 0.57 · 67.4% (124 of 184 decks)
- Tezzeret's Gambit relevance 0.37 · 45.7% (84 of 184 decks)
- Contentious Plan relevance 0.37 · 39.1% (72 of 184 decks)
- Combat Tutorial relevance 0.38 · 14.7% (27 of 184 decks)
- Stealth Mission relevance 0.40 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Ravenform relevance 0.24 · 11.4% (21 of 184 decks)
- Spectral Deluge relevance 0.22 · 13.6% (25 of 184 decks)
- Callous Dismissal relevance 0.29 · 3.8% (7 of 184 decks)
- Retraced Image relevance 0.24 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Curse of the Swine relevance 0.20 · 11.4% (21 of 184 decks)
- Lórien Revealed relevance 0.19 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Selective Obliteration relevance 0.27 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Expansion Algorithm relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Wash Out relevance 0.16 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Fabricate relevance 0.12 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- River's Rebuke relevance 0.15 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Stock Up relevance 0.13 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Ponder relevance 0.09 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Preordain relevance 0.09 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Windfall relevance 0.09 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
Planeswalkers
6
Planeswalkers
6 Showing 1-6 of 6
Page size
All planeswalkers (6)
- Teferi, Temporal Pilgrim relevance 0.36 · 39.7% (73 of 184 decks)
- Jace, Arcane Strategist relevance 0.31 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Jace, Wielder of Mysteries relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (26 of 184 decks)
- The Aetherspark relevance 0.26 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Kaito, Cunning Infiltrator relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Teferi, Master of Time relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
Utility Lands
50
Utility Lands
50 Showing 1-10 of 50
Page size
All utility lands (50)
- The Monumental Facade relevance 0.70 · 26.1% (48 of 184 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.50 · 58.2% (107 of 184 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.40 · 69.0% (127 of 184 decks)
- Diamond City relevance 0.60 · 28.8% (53 of 184 decks)
- Hall of Oracles relevance 0.58 · 27.7% (51 of 184 decks)
- Tyrite Sanctum relevance 0.50 · 34.8% (64 of 184 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.56 · 20.7% (38 of 184 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.42 · 10.9% (20 of 184 decks)
- Drannith Ruins relevance 0.45 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.41 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Hydroelectric Specimen // Hydroelectric Laboratory relevance 0.20 · 27.7% (51 of 184 decks)
- Terrain Generator relevance 0.23 · 13.0% (24 of 184 decks)
- Scavenger Grounds relevance 0.22 · 12.0% (22 of 184 decks)
- Inkmoth Nexus relevance 0.25 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.19 · 20.1% (37 of 184 decks)
- Ruins of Oran-Rief relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.17 · 26.6% (49 of 184 decks)
- War Room relevance 0.19 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Arid Archway relevance 0.24 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Glasspool Mimic // Glasspool Shore relevance 0.21 · 9.2% (17 of 184 decks)
- Lonely Sandbar relevance 0.18 · 14.1% (26 of 184 decks)
- Sink into Stupor // Soporific Springs relevance 0.16 · 29.9% (55 of 184 decks)
- Otawara, Soaring City relevance 0.15 · 30.4% (56 of 184 decks)
- HELIOS One relevance 0.33 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Urza's Saga relevance 0.17 · 17.4% (32 of 184 decks)
- Remote Isle relevance 0.21 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Sea Gate Restoration // Sea Gate, Reborn relevance 0.17 · 14.1% (26 of 184 decks)
- Demolition Field relevance 0.20 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.09 · 71.2% (131 of 184 decks)
- Agna Qel'a relevance 0.19 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Uthros, Titanic Godcore relevance 0.18 · 8.2% (15 of 184 decks)
- Desert of the Mindful relevance 0.20 · 3.8% (7 of 184 decks)
- Urza's Cave relevance 0.19 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Cephalid Coliseum relevance 0.17 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Jwari Disruption // Jwari Ruins relevance 0.18 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Tolaria West relevance 0.17 · 4.3% (8 of 184 decks)
- Abstergo Entertainment relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Hidden Cataract relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Rivendell relevance 0.15 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Mystic Sanctuary relevance 0.09 · 43.5% (80 of 184 decks)
- Blast Zone relevance 0.20 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Minamo, School at Water's Edge relevance 0.14 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Inventors' Fair relevance 0.14 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Academy Ruins relevance 0.13 · 8.7% (16 of 184 decks)
- Geier Reach Sanitarium relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Bonders' Enclave relevance 0.18 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Mistrise Village relevance 0.14 · 3.8% (7 of 184 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Ghost Quarter relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Emergence Zone relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
Lands
21
Lands
21 Showing 1-10 of 21
Page size
All lands (21)
- Mage-Ring Network relevance 0.30 · 4.9% (9 of 184 decks)
- Nykthos, Shrine to Nyx relevance 0.19 · 23.4% (43 of 184 decks)
- Saprazzan Skerry relevance 0.24 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Gemstone Caverns relevance 0.20 · 7.6% (14 of 184 decks)
- Ancient Tomb relevance 0.18 · 10.3% (19 of 184 decks)
- Temple of the False God relevance 0.18 · 7.1% (13 of 184 decks)
- Polluted Delta relevance 0.17 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Snow-Covered Island relevance 0.18 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Misty Rainforest relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Flooded Strand relevance 0.17 · 6.0% (11 of 184 decks)
- Scalding Tarn relevance 0.17 · 5.4% (10 of 184 decks)
- City of Traitors relevance 0.19 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Muraganda Raceway relevance 0.17 · 3.3% (6 of 184 decks)
- Crystal Vein relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Guildless Commons relevance 0.17 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Seat of the Synod relevance 0.11 · 6.5% (12 of 184 decks)
- Prismatic Vista relevance 0.15 · 2.7% (5 of 184 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.14 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Command Tower relevance 0.13 · 2.2% (4 of 184 decks)
- Island relevance 0.02 · 89.1% (164 of 184 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Danny Pink, from 184 real Commander decks.