Change per day
Archetypes
100% of decks lean toward it
49% of decks lean toward it
34% of decks lean toward it
Top Picks
With signature card Hardened Scales
100% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Kami of Whispered Hopes
49% of decks lean toward it
With signature card Rishkar, Peema Renegade
34% of decks lean toward it
Measured on 77 of these decks. A deck leans toward an archetype when at least a twentieth of its makeup follows that plan, so one deck can lean toward several.
Cards like Hardened Scales
14× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
66% of decks run one or more
vs. 7% of other Abzan decks
31% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.97 per deck on average
vs. 0.10 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Kami of Whispered Hopes
16× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
29% of decks run two or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
0.94 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Gyre Sage
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.69 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Gyre Sage 35%
- Incubation Druid 34%
Cards like Carrion Feeder
9.4× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 9% of other Abzan decks
26% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.79 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Inspiring Call
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
64% of decks run one or more
vs. 6% of other Abzan decks
22% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.86 per deck on average
vs. 0.07 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Inspiring Call 62%
- Duty Beyond Death 24%
Cards like Forgotten Ancient
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
48% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
18% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.66 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Medusa, Inhuman Queen, Steelburr Champion
Cards like Village Rites
6.2× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 8% of other Abzan decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.55 per deck on average
vs. 0.12 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Village Rites 18%
- Deadly Dispute 15%
- Corrupted Conviction 12%
- Altar's Reap 2%
- Eviscerator's Insight 2%
- Reckoner's Bargain 1%
- Costly Plunder 1%
- Merciless Resolve 1%
- Nasty End 1%
Other options: Fanatical Offering
Cards like Arwen, Weaver of Hope
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
11% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.54 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Hangarback Walker
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Skyclave Shadowcat
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Skyclave Shadowcat 23%
- Shaile, Dean of Radiance // Embrose, Dean of Shadow 16%
- Meltstrider Eulogist 10%
- Tributary Instructor 2%
Other options: Promising Duskmage
Cards like Duskshell Crawler
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
38% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
10% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.50 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Drix Fatemaker, Baloth Pup, Trollbred Guardian, Hornbash Mentor
Cards like Host of the Hereafter
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
43% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
8% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.63 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Host of the Hereafter 34%
- Iron Apprentice 8%
- Servant of the Scale 6%
- Enduring Bondwarden 6%
- Star Pupil 4%
- Dockworker Drone 3%
- Parish-Blade Trainee 2%
Other options: Spiteful Squad, Sparring Construct, Graft Surgeon
Cards like Good-Fortune Unicorn
13× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
45% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Ozolith, the Shattered Spire
12× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
32% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
7% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.38 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Ashnod's Altar
3.1× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 11% of other Abzan decks
9% of decks run two or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
0.32 per deck on average
vs. 0.13 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Avacyn's Pilgrim
1.6× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
27% of decks run one or more
vs. 20% of other Abzan decks
16% of decks run two or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
0.60 per deck on average
vs. 0.37 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Avacyn's Pilgrim 23%
- Llanowar Elves 18%
- Elvish Mystic 12%
- Fyndhorn Elves 5%
- Boreal Druid 2%
Other options: Llanowar Tribe, Nantuko Elder, Bog Initiate, Llanowar Dead, Wirewood Elf, Fyndhorn Elder, Greenweaver Druid, Leaf Gilder, Woodland Mystic, Golden Hind, Rootrider Faun, Druid of the Cowl, Skyshroud Troopers, Goobbue Gardener, Steward of Valeron, Orochi Sustainer
Cards like Abzan Battle Priest
12× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
30% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
6% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.36 per deck on average
vs. 0.05 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Master Chef
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
46% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
5% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.51 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
- Master Chef 42%
- Noble Heritage 9%
Cards like Mikaeus, the Lunarch
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
36% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
4% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.40 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Other options: Capricopian, Hungering Hydra, Feral Hydra
Cards like Abzan Ascendancy
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
58% of decks run one or more
vs. 3% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.62 per deck on average
vs. 0.03 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Terrasymbiosis
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
40% of decks run one or more
vs. 4% of other Abzan decks
2% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.42 per deck on average
vs. 0.04 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Viscera Seer
2.0× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
19% of decks run one or more
vs. 10% of other Abzan decks
3% of decks run two or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
0.22 per deck on average
vs. 0.11 in other Abzan decks
Cards like Beifong's Bounty Hunters
Over 20× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
15% of decks run one or more
vs. 1% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.16 per deck on average
vs. 0.01 in other Abzan decks
Cards
Cards like Fertilid
15× as likely as other Abzan decks to run two or more
Stats
23% of decks run one or more
vs. 2% of other Abzan decks
1% of decks run two or more
vs. <1% of other Abzan decks
0.24 per deck on average
vs. 0.02 in other Abzan decks
All top picks (50)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.48 · 54.1% (79 of 146 decks)
- Basri's Lieutenant relevance 0.59 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.41 · 57.5% (84 of 146 decks)
- Skyclave Shadowcat relevance 0.57 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.47 · 41.8% (61 of 146 decks)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.36 · 62.3% (91 of 146 decks)
- Reluctant Role Model relevance 0.50 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.41 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.50 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Bloodspore Thrinax relevance 0.49 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.43 · 37.0% (54 of 146 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.39 · 43.8% (64 of 146 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.39 · 43.8% (64 of 146 decks)
- Felothar, Dawn of the Abzan relevance 0.40 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Host of the Hereafter relevance 0.42 · 33.6% (49 of 146 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.41 · 34.9% (51 of 146 decks)
- Shaile, Dean of Radiance // Embrose, Dean of Shadow relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.39 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.33 · 56.2% (82 of 146 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.42 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.34 · 50.7% (74 of 146 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Grakmaw, Skyclave Ravager relevance 0.46 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.36 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.36 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (57 of 146 decks)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.39 · 34.9% (51 of 146 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.36 · 37.0% (54 of 146 decks)
- One with the Kami relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.31 · 50.7% (74 of 146 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.36 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Nikara, Lair Scavenger relevance 0.44 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.42 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.34 · 36.3% (53 of 146 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.38 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 0.41 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.41 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.43 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.35 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Beifong's Bounty Hunters relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.39 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Boss's Chauffeur relevance 0.44 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.40 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
All creatures (50)
- Felisa, Fang of Silverquill relevance 0.48 · 54.1% (79 of 146 decks)
- Basri's Lieutenant relevance 0.59 · 30.1% (44 of 146 decks)
- Skyclave Shadowcat relevance 0.57 · 22.6% (33 of 146 decks)
- Reluctant Role Model relevance 0.50 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Forgotten Ancient relevance 0.41 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Hangarback Walker relevance 0.50 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Bloodspore Thrinax relevance 0.49 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Hamza, Guardian of Arashin relevance 0.43 · 37.0% (54 of 146 decks)
- Evolution Witness relevance 0.39 · 43.8% (64 of 146 decks)
- Conclave Mentor relevance 0.39 · 43.8% (64 of 146 decks)
- Felothar, Dawn of the Abzan relevance 0.40 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Host of the Hereafter relevance 0.42 · 33.6% (49 of 146 decks)
- Armorcraft Judge relevance 0.46 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Gyre Sage relevance 0.41 · 34.9% (51 of 146 decks)
- Shaile, Dean of Radiance // Embrose, Dean of Shadow relevance 0.50 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Falconer relevance 0.39 · 39.7% (58 of 146 decks)
- Mikaeus, the Lunarch relevance 0.42 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Duskshell Crawler relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Rishkar, Peema Renegade relevance 0.34 · 50.7% (74 of 146 decks)
- Arwen, Weaver of Hope relevance 0.43 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Grakmaw, Skyclave Ravager relevance 0.46 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Corpsejack Menace relevance 0.36 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Good-Fortune Unicorn relevance 0.37 · 39.0% (57 of 146 decks)
- Hopeful Initiate relevance 0.45 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Warden of the Grove relevance 0.35 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Kami of Whispered Hopes relevance 0.31 · 50.7% (74 of 146 decks)
- Incubation Druid relevance 0.36 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Nikara, Lair Scavenger relevance 0.44 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Kodama of the West Tree relevance 0.38 · 25.3% (37 of 146 decks)
- Ivorytusk Fortress relevance 0.41 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Marketback Walker relevance 0.43 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Winding Constrictor relevance 0.35 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Beifong's Bounty Hunters relevance 0.41 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Battle Priest relevance 0.39 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Boss's Chauffeur relevance 0.44 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Fertilid relevance 0.40 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Loyal Guardian relevance 0.44 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Renata, Called to the Hunt relevance 0.40 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Ainok Bond-Kin relevance 0.40 · 16.4% (24 of 146 decks)
- Managorger Hydra relevance 0.38 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Champion of Lambholt relevance 0.33 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Tuskguard Captain relevance 0.39 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Rayblade Trooper relevance 0.46 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Bartolomé del Presidio relevance 0.33 · 30.8% (45 of 146 decks)
- Ghave, Guru of Spores relevance 0.38 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Safehold Elite relevance 0.40 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Dusk Legion Duelist relevance 0.38 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Carrion Feeder relevance 0.29 · 37.7% (55 of 146 decks)
- Putrid Goblin relevance 0.39 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Iron Apprentice relevance 0.43 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
All artifacts (43)
- Cauldron of Souls relevance 0.45 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- The Ozolith relevance 0.33 · 32.9% (48 of 146 decks)
- Ozolith, the Shattered Spire relevance 0.35 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- The Earth Crystal relevance 0.31 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Thunderous Velocipede relevance 0.37 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- The Ooze relevance 0.34 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- The Great Henge relevance 0.25 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Ashnod's Altar relevance 0.22 · 21.2% (31 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Banner relevance 0.28 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Cauldron of Essence relevance 0.24 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Skullclamp relevance 0.20 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Phyrexian Altar relevance 0.23 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Altar of Dementia relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Golgari Signet relevance 0.21 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Blasting Station relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- The Skullspore Nexus relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Fellwar Stone relevance 0.18 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Animation Module relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Spawning Pit relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Signet relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Agatha's Soul Cauldron relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Orzhov Signet relevance 0.17 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- The Masamune relevance 0.27 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Talisman of Hierarchy relevance 0.17 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Gilded Lotus relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Thought Vessel relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sword of Truth and Justice relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Talisman of Unity relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Marble Diamond relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Indatha Crystal relevance 0.21 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Talisman of Resilience relevance 0.15 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Charcoal Diamond relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Ghost Lantern // Bind Spirit relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Andúril, Narsil Reforged relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Commander's Sphere relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Herd Heirloom relevance 0.16 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Bow of Nylea relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Mind Stone relevance 0.16 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Swiftfoot Boots relevance 0.10 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Arcane Signet relevance 0.05 · 54.1% (79 of 146 decks)
- Lightning Greaves relevance 0.10 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Birthing Pod relevance 0.14 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Sol Ring relevance 0.03 · 61.6% (90 of 146 decks)
All enchantments (50)
- Abzan Ascendancy relevance 0.41 · 57.5% (84 of 146 decks)
- Master Chef relevance 0.47 · 41.8% (61 of 146 decks)
- Hardened Scales relevance 0.33 · 56.2% (82 of 146 decks)
- Hollowmurk Siege relevance 0.36 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Branching Evolution relevance 0.36 · 37.0% (54 of 146 decks)
- One with the Kami relevance 0.48 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Together Forever relevance 0.42 · 18.5% (27 of 146 decks)
- Terrasymbiosis relevance 0.34 · 36.3% (53 of 146 decks)
- Retribution of the Ancients relevance 0.41 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Resourceful Defense relevance 0.38 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Death's Presence relevance 0.41 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Cathars' Crusade relevance 0.32 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Barrensteppe Siege relevance 0.34 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Noble Heritage relevance 0.40 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Innkeeper's Talent relevance 0.33 · 17.1% (25 of 146 decks)
- Greater Good relevance 0.30 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Communal Brewing relevance 0.37 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Loading Zone relevance 0.34 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Field of Souls relevance 0.39 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Valkyrie's Call relevance 0.34 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Puca's Covenant relevance 0.35 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Sphere Grid relevance 0.31 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Solid Ground relevance 0.36 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Court of Garenbrig relevance 0.32 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Evolutionary Leap relevance 0.31 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Tribute to the World Tree relevance 0.28 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Stocking the Pantry relevance 0.32 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Doubling Season relevance 0.22 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Feast of the Victorious Dead relevance 0.29 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Citadel Siege relevance 0.30 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Felidar Retreat relevance 0.21 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Laid to Rest relevance 0.32 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Leader's Talent relevance 0.30 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Vampiric Rites relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Pattern of Rebirth relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Into the Pit relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Bastion of Remembrance relevance 0.23 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Earthbender Ascension relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Sigarda's Summons relevance 0.27 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Virtue of Loyalty // Ardenvale Fealty relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Revival of the Ancestors relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Sparring Regimen relevance 0.31 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Guardian Project relevance 0.19 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- New Horizons relevance 0.27 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Case of the Stashed Skeleton relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- High Score relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Golgari Germination relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Smile at Death relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Oath of Ajani relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Battle of Hoover Dam relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All instants (50)
- Inspiring Call relevance 0.36 · 62.3% (91 of 146 decks)
- Duty Beyond Death relevance 0.35 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Unbreakable Formation relevance 0.32 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Silkguard relevance 0.37 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Abzan Charm relevance 0.27 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Corrupted Conviction relevance 0.32 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Village Rites relevance 0.29 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Cauldron Haze relevance 0.34 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Makeshift Mannequin relevance 0.39 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Deadly Dispute relevance 0.26 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Pledge of Unity relevance 0.32 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Snakeskin Veil relevance 0.27 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Awakening of Vitu-Ghazi relevance 0.35 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Lethal Scheme relevance 0.26 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Wake the Dead relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Lifecrafter's Gift relevance 0.33 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Heritage Reclamation relevance 0.25 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Mythos of Nethroi relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Fatal Fissure relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Plumb the Forbidden relevance 0.24 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Return of the Wildspeaker relevance 0.23 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Feign Death relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Undying Malice relevance 0.26 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Atomize relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Dromoka's Command relevance 0.25 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Archdruid's Charm relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Parting Gust relevance 0.24 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Generous Gift relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Beast Within relevance 0.15 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Tend the Pests relevance 0.25 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Witherbloom Charm relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Lifestream's Blessing relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Assassin's Trophy relevance 0.12 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Fatal Push relevance 0.24 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Semester's End relevance 0.23 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Putrefy relevance 0.17 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Dark Ritual relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Origin of Metalbending relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Stroke of Midnight relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Emergency Eject relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Inkshield relevance 0.18 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Altar's Reap relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Eladamri's Call relevance 0.15 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Momentous Fall relevance 0.19 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Loran's Escape relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Blacksmith's Skill relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Dire Tactics relevance 0.21 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Eviscerator's Insight relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Path to Exile relevance 0.09 · 38.4% (56 of 146 decks)
- Kin-Tree Severance relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
All sorceries (50)
- Damning Verdict relevance 0.39 · 34.9% (51 of 146 decks)
- Fangs of Kalonia relevance 0.42 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Life's Legacy relevance 0.41 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Basri's Solidarity relevance 0.45 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Ceaseless Conflict relevance 0.47 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Rishkar's Expertise relevance 0.35 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Requisition Raid relevance 0.32 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Victimize relevance 0.27 · 28.8% (42 of 146 decks)
- Duneblast relevance 0.31 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Desperate Plea relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Storm of Souls relevance 0.36 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Germination Practicum relevance 0.30 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Season of Gathering relevance 0.30 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Persist relevance 0.30 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Life // Death relevance 0.29 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- March of Souls relevance 0.37 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Ascend from Avernus relevance 0.28 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Bone Shards relevance 0.29 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Collective Effort relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Courage in Crisis relevance 0.29 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Vigor Mortis relevance 0.32 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Lich-Knights' Conquest relevance 0.25 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Call a Surprise Witness relevance 0.31 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Painful Truths relevance 0.22 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Recommission relevance 0.30 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Unmarked Grave relevance 0.22 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Lively Dirge relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Rampant Growth relevance 0.15 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Eerie Ultimatum relevance 0.15 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- Rite of Consumption relevance 0.26 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Vindicate relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Unburial Rites relevance 0.20 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Damn relevance 0.17 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Rite of Oblivion relevance 0.22 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Shamanic Revelation relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Footsteps of the Goryo relevance 0.26 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Unearth relevance 0.21 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Scout for Survivors relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Aggressive Negotiations relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Eldritch Evolution relevance 0.18 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Kodama's Reach relevance 0.14 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Aberrant Return relevance 0.24 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Living Death relevance 0.17 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Map the Wastes relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Cost of Brilliance relevance 0.23 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Three Visits relevance 0.13 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Legions to Ashes relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Farewell relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Diabolic Intent relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Primal Growth relevance 0.22 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
That's every card in this section.
All planeswalkers (4)
- Jiang Yanggu, Wildcrafter relevance 0.37 · 8.2% (12 of 146 decks)
- Basri Ket relevance 0.31 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Nissa of Shadowed Boughs relevance 0.15 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Elspeth, Storm Slayer relevance 0.12 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All utility lands (50)
- Abandoned Air Temple relevance 0.35 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Gavony Township relevance 0.29 · 31.5% (46 of 146 decks)
- Opal Palace relevance 0.35 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Susur Secundi, Void Altar relevance 0.32 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Revitalizing Repast // Old-Growth Grove relevance 0.26 · 34.2% (50 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Reborn relevance 0.36 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Ba Sing Se relevance 0.32 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Disciple of Freyalise // Garden of Freyalise relevance 0.26 · 20.5% (30 of 146 decks)
- High Market relevance 0.27 · 13.7% (20 of 146 decks)
- Vastwood Fortification // Vastwood Thicket relevance 0.34 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Karn's Bastion relevance 0.24 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Oran-Rief, the Vastwood relevance 0.29 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Bala Ged Recovery // Bala Ged Sanctuary relevance 0.22 · 15.8% (23 of 146 decks)
- Malakir Rebirth // Malakir Mire relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Witch Enchanter // Witch-Blessed Meadow relevance 0.21 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Nesting Grounds relevance 0.23 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Turntimber Symbiosis // Turntimber, Serpentine Wood relevance 0.26 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Myriad Landscape relevance 0.21 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Bretagard Stronghold relevance 0.28 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Fell the Profane // Fell Mire relevance 0.20 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Bridgeworks Battle // Tanglespan Bridgeworks relevance 0.21 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Agadeem's Awakening // Agadeem, the Undercrypt relevance 0.21 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Deceptive Landscape relevance 0.15 · 23.3% (34 of 146 decks)
- Great Arashin City relevance 0.22 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Mosswort Bridge relevance 0.21 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Indatha Triome relevance 0.11 · 37.0% (54 of 146 decks)
- Glasswing Grace // Age-Graced Chapel relevance 0.20 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Forge of Heroes relevance 0.25 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Hidden Hideout relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Hagra Mauling // Hagra Broodpit relevance 0.22 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Temple of Silence relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Temple of Malady relevance 0.14 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Temple of Plenty relevance 0.14 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Boseiju, Who Endures relevance 0.13 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Path of Ancestry relevance 0.11 · 19.9% (29 of 146 decks)
- Lush Portico relevance 0.13 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Underground Mortuary relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Shadowy Backstreet relevance 0.13 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Khalni Ambush // Khalni Territory relevance 0.20 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
- Nurturing Peatland relevance 0.14 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Grim Backwoods relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Takenuma, Abandoned Mire relevance 0.13 · 4.8% (7 of 146 decks)
- Westvale Abbey // Ormendahl, Profane Prince relevance 0.17 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
- Yavimaya, Cradle of Growth relevance 0.11 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Horizon Canopy relevance 0.13 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Rogue's Passage relevance 0.12 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Reliquary Tower relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth relevance 0.12 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Bojuka Bog relevance 0.09 · 15.1% (22 of 146 decks)
- Lazotep Quarry relevance 0.17 · 2.1% (3 of 146 decks)
All lands (50)
- Blooming Marsh relevance 0.24 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Viridescent Bog relevance 0.23 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Darkbore Pathway // Slitherbore Pathway relevance 0.23 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Terramorphic Expanse relevance 0.19 · 17.8% (26 of 146 decks)
- Wastewood Verge relevance 0.19 · 11.6% (17 of 146 decks)
- Desolate Mire relevance 0.22 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Fetid Heath relevance 0.20 · 10.3% (15 of 146 decks)
- Deathcap Glade relevance 0.16 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Branchloft Pathway // Boulderloft Pathway relevance 0.20 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Phyrexian Tower relevance 0.18 · 11.0% (16 of 146 decks)
- Bountiful Promenade relevance 0.14 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Golgari Rot Farm relevance 0.17 · 13.0% (19 of 146 decks)
- Razorverge Thicket relevance 0.20 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Llanowar Wastes relevance 0.13 · 35.6% (52 of 146 decks)
- Concealed Courtyard relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Wooded Bastion relevance 0.20 · 5.5% (8 of 146 decks)
- Caves of Koilos relevance 0.13 · 32.2% (47 of 146 decks)
- Orzhov Basilica relevance 0.18 · 9.6% (14 of 146 decks)
- Sungrass Prairie relevance 0.16 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Shattered Sanctum relevance 0.16 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Tainted Wood relevance 0.18 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Vault of Champions relevance 0.14 · 21.9% (32 of 146 decks)
- Undergrowth Stadium relevance 0.13 · 28.1% (41 of 146 decks)
- Fabled Passage relevance 0.16 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Twilight Mire relevance 0.15 · 14.4% (21 of 146 decks)
- Bleachbone Verge relevance 0.17 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Hushwood Verge relevance 0.16 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Blossoming Sands relevance 0.17 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Haunted Mire relevance 0.19 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Evolving Wilds relevance 0.13 · 24.7% (36 of 146 decks)
- Brushland relevance 0.12 · 29.5% (43 of 146 decks)
- Jungle Hollow relevance 0.16 · 6.2% (9 of 146 decks)
- Selesnya Sanctuary relevance 0.15 · 7.5% (11 of 146 decks)
- Golgari Guildgate relevance 0.19 · 3.4% (5 of 146 decks)
- Marsh Flats relevance 0.12 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Murmuring Bosk relevance 0.13 · 12.3% (18 of 146 decks)
- Overgrown Farmland relevance 0.12 · 19.2% (28 of 146 decks)
- Verdant Catacombs relevance 0.11 · 24.0% (35 of 146 decks)
- Brightclimb Pathway // Grimclimb Pathway relevance 0.16 · 4.1% (6 of 146 decks)
- Windswept Heath relevance 0.11 · 26.0% (38 of 146 decks)
- Savannah relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Godless Shrine relevance 0.09 · 43.2% (63 of 146 decks)
- Bayou relevance 0.14 · 6.8% (10 of 146 decks)
- Necroblossom Snarl relevance 0.13 · 8.9% (13 of 146 decks)
- Sunpetal Grove relevance 0.09 · 40.4% (59 of 146 decks)
- Temple Garden relevance 0.08 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Overgrown Tomb relevance 0.08 · 42.5% (62 of 146 decks)
- Woodland Cemetery relevance 0.08 · 43.8% (64 of 146 decks)
- Sandsteppe Citadel relevance 0.08 · 45.2% (66 of 146 decks)
- Thriving Heath relevance 0.18 · 2.7% (4 of 146 decks)
EDH staples, signature cards, and recommendations for Reyhan, Last of the Abzan // Alharu, Solemn Ritualist, from 146 real Commander partner decks.